Post-Contemporary Armen Avanessian and Suhail Malik, eds 5 107 The Speculative What is at Stake Time Complex in the Future? —Armen Avanessian —Alex Williams and Suhail Malik and Nick Srnicek illustrations by 115 Andreas Töpfer Fractured Mediations 57 —Victoria Ivanova On Speculative Design 135 —Benjamin H. Bratton The Construction of 89 Unpredictability —Elena Esposito Strategies for Future We’s 145 —Laboria Cuboniks in conversation Situating Global Forms —Aihwa Ong in conversation 159 Letters from the Ocean Terminus —David Roden Armen Avanessian frequently teaches at art academies in Europe and the US. He is founder of the bilingual research platform [www.spekulative-poetik.de] and editor in chief at Merve Verlag Berlin. Recent English publications include Speculative Drawing (together with Andreas Töpfer, 2014), as co-editor #Accelerate: The Accelerationist Reader (2014) and Genealogies of Speculation (2016). Avanessian’s Overwrite – Ethics of Knowledge. Poetics of Existence is forthcoming with Sternberg Press. Suhail Malik is Co-Director of the MFA Fine Art, Goldsmiths, London, where he holds a Readership in Critical Studies, and was 2012-15 Visiting Faculty at CCS Bard, New York. Recent and forthcoming publications include, as author, On the Necessity of Art’s Exit From Contemporary Art (2016) and “The Ontology of Finance” in Collapse 8: Casino Real (2015), and, as co-editor, Realism Materialism Art (2015), and Genealogies of Speculation (2016). Post-Contemporary Armen Avanessian and Suhail Malik, eds The Speculative Time Complex —Armen Avanessian and Suhail Malik illustrations by Andreas Töpfer Victoria Ivanova Fractured Mediations 5 Armen Avanessian The basic thesis of post-contemporary is that time is changing. We are not just living in a new time or accelerated time, but time itself—the direction of time—has changed. We no longer have a linear time, in the sense of the past being followed by the present and then the future. It’s rather the other way around: the future happens before the present, time arrives from the future. If people have the impression that time is out of joint, or that time doesn’t make sense anymore, or it isn’t as it used to be, then the reason is, I think, that they have—or we all have—problems getting used to living in such a speculative time or within a speculative temporality. Armen Avanessian and Suhail Malik Suhail Malik Yes, and the main reason for the speculative reorganization of time is the complexity and scale of social organization today. If the leading conditions of complex societies are systems, infrastructures and networks rather than individual human agents, human experience loses its primacy, as do the semantics and politics based on it. Correspondingly, the present as the primary category of human experience—in its biological sentience at least—which has been the basis for both the understanding of time and of what time is (or, at least, what it is presumed to be), also loses its priority in favor of what we could Time Complex The Speculative call a time-complex.¹ One theoretical ramification of the deprioritization of the present we can mention straightaway, but will need to return to 7 later, is that it is no longer necessary to explain the movement of the past and the future on the ¹ The time-complex 2104). But the is specific to the speculative time- structures of complex is distinct integrated socio- to Stiegler’s thesis in technical and psychic that (i) it comprises mnemic systems a speculative of individuation constitution of proposed by Bernard time rather than Stiegler. See for memory and human example Technics temporalization, and and Time Volume (ii) the speculative 2: Disorientation, time-complex trans. Stephen is here affirmed Barker (Stanford, against Stiegler’s CA: Stanford appeal to rescuing University Press, an aesthetically- Armen Avanessian and Suhail Malik 2008) and Symbolic constituted present, and the future enter into an economy Misery Volume 1: experience of where maybe none of these modes is primary, or The Hyperindustrial individuation despite where the future replaces the present as the lead Epoch, trans. complexifying structuring aspect of time. This is not absolutely Barnaby Norman sociotechnical new, of course: for a long time political economy (Oxford: Polity, configurations. and social processes have been practically dealing with the subordination of the human to the social basis of the present. We are instead in a situation and technical organization of complex societies. where human experience is only a part of—or Equally, under the heading of Speculative even subordinated to—more complex formations Realism, philosophy too has recently been trying constructed historically and with a view to what to reset the notion of speculation as the task of can be obtained in the future. The past and the finding more-than-human forms of knowledge future are equally important in the organization of by establishing the conditions within conceptual the system and this overshadows the present as thought of knowledge of what is beyond human Time Complex The Speculative the leading configuration of time. experience. That project is certainly attached to Complex societies—which means more- the conditions of the time-complex but is also 8 than-human societies at scales of sociotechnical distinct to it— 9 organization that surpass phenomenological determination—are those in which the past, the AA And to some concrete examples of the speculative time-complex that we know from everyday experience or from daily news. These are phenomena that usually start with the prefix “pre- ”, like preemptive strikes, preemptive policing, the preemptive personality— SM Could you outline these phenomena? we do have to learn how to deal with it in AA a productive or more pro-active manner. What has been called preemptive personality or Another thing, often criticized, is the politics personalization is how you get a certain package of preemptive strikes, which is also or information about what you might want that a new phenomenon of the 21st century. Brian you haven’t explicitly asked for from a commercial Massumi and others have written about the Armen Avanessian and Suhail Malik service.² We know a version of this from Amazon: kind of recursive truth they produce: you bomb its algorithmic somewhere and then afterwards you will find the ² Rob Horning, procedures give us enemy you expected.³ You produce a situation “Preemptive recommendations for that was initially a personalization,” books associated with ³ Brian Massumi, speculation. The logic The New Enquiry one’s actual choices “Potential Politics here is recursive and, (September 11, 2014), but the preemptive and the Primacy of to reiterate, the strike accessed on [http:// personality is one Preemption,” Theory is not made in order thenewinquiry.com/ step ahead: you get & Event 10:2, (2007). to avoid something, blogs/marginal- a product that you a deterrence before utility/preemptive- actually want. The the enemy strikes. It’s also very different to the personalization/]. company’s algorithms twentieth century logic of the balance of threats know your desires; or prevention. Rather, what happens in the they know your needs even before you become present is based on a preemption of the future, Time Complex The Speculative aware of them yourself. It doesn’t make sense and of course this is also linked to what has been to say in advance that “I’ll send it back” because called a tendency towards premediation in 11 10 it is likely that it will be something you will need. the media. I don’t think that all this is necessarily bad, but Another everyday example of this new speculative temporality discussed a lot nowadays is preemptive policing. You have it in science fiction, notably with the “PreCrime” and precog detection of Philip K. Dick’s Minority Report (and the Spielberg film based on it). Versions of this are adopted more and more in policing today. This has to be distinguished from other current surveillance strategies; for example, CCTV is more of an older idea of watching what people are doing or documenting what they have done, to reinforce exclusion mechanisms. The question today, if one puts it in chronological terms, seems to be more along the lines: what kind of policing is needed to apprehend people even before they do something, with what they will do—as if the future-position promises more power, which creates a future- paranoia? This is less a surveillance directed to Armen Avanessian and Suhail Malik the exclusion of people than one that deals with people inside the social space, with the value they produce. How can they be observed and how to extract value from their activities? There is of course a hugely important biopolitical factor in this regulation of the population, especially with regards to medicine and insurance. SM Along with “pre-”, what’s advanced by the time- complex is also a condition of the “post”, the current ubiquity of which characterizes where we are at now, and which is maybe added to with the contention of the post-contemporary. Everything Time Complex The Speculative now seems to be “post-” something else, which indexes that our understanding of what is 12 happening now has some relation to but is also 13 disconnected to historically given conditions.… While the “pre-” indexes a kind of anticipatory deduction of the future that is acting in the present—so that future is already working within the now, again indicating how the present isn’t the primary category but is understood to be organized by the future—what the “post-” marks is how what’s happening now is in relationship to what has happened but is no longer. We are the future of something else. The “post-” is also a mark of the deprioritization of the present.