Frame Blending in Specialized Language Harmful Algal Bloom

Frame Blending in Specialized Language Harmful Algal Bloom

John Benjamins Publishing Company This is a contribution from Terminology 19:2 © 2013. John Benjamins Publishing Company This electronic file may not be altered in any way. The author(s) of this article is/are permitted to use this PDF file to generate printed copies to be used by way of offprints, for their personal use only. Permission is granted by the publishers to post this file on a closed server which is accessible to members (students and staff) only of the author’s/s’ institute, it is not permitted to post this PDF on the open internet. For any other use of this material prior written permission should be obtained from the publishers or through the Copyright Clearance Center (for USA: www.copyright.com). Please contact [email protected] or consult our website: www.benjamins.com Tables of Contents, abstracts and guidelines are available at www.benjamins.com Frame blending in specialized language Harmful algal bloom José Manuel Ureña Gómez-Moreno, Pamela Faber and Miriam Buendía Castro According to Frame-Based Terminology (Faber et al. 2005, 2006, 2007), a crucial issue in terminology management is how specialized concepts should be repre- sented within the knowledge structure of a scientific domain. This paper pro- poses a model of specialized concept representation based on conceptual frames (Faber et al. 2006, 2007; Faber 2011) and blends (Fauconnier 1999; Fauconnier and Turner 1998, 2002). Although frame-blending has been documented in general language (cf. Coulson 2005), it has not as yet been studied in specialized language. In this paper, we show how it can be applied to harmful algal bloom in the field of marine biology. Keywords: conceptual blending, metaphor, Frame-based Terminology, predicate-argument structure, Frame Semantics 1. Introduction Frame Semantics represents the meaning of words in terms of interpretive frames (Fillmore 1982, 1985; Fillmore and Atkins 1992, 1993). A frame is defined as a system of concepts that are related in such a way that one concept evokes the en- tire system. Based on this definition, Frame Semantics implicitly claims to be a theory of how concepts are organized and represented in the mind (Croft 2009: 8). The practical application of Frame Semantics is FrameNet (framenet.icsi.berkeley. edu), a lexical database that currently contains over 11,600 lexical units in more than 960 semantic frames. The aim of this resource is to document semantic and syntactic combinatorial possibilities of each word for all of its meanings. We applied the tenets of FrameNet to specialized language, and analyzed the frames and semantic roles of harmful algal bloom, based on corpus data. Our analysis of the concept harmful algal bloom (hab) situated it within a larger Terminology 19:2 (2013), 175–201. doi 10.1075/term.19.2.02gom issn 0929–9971 / e-issn 1569–9994 © John Benjamins Publishing Company 176 José Manuel Ureña Gómez-Moreno, Pamela Faber and Miriam Buendía Castro conceptual configuration as proposed by Frame-based Terminology (FBT) (Faber et al. 2005, 2006, 2007). Our analysis also accounted for the metaphorical meaning of the concept. There is a body of cognitive-linguistic studies that account for the metaphorical grounding of terminological units. For instance, Lakoff and Núñez (2000) analyze mathematical concepts on the basis of human experiences, which are metaphorical in nature. In this article, the metaphor numbers are physical segments allows us to characterize natural numbers, zero, and positive complex fractions (rational numbers) in terms of physical segments. Though insightful, studies of this type are restricted to the two-domain mappings advocated by Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff 1993). Precisely for this reason, the need for representing figurative meaning from a frame-based perspective is long overdue. Frame Semantics has not as yet in- cluded links in FrameNet that reflect the metaphorical relation between domains (Ruppenhofer et al. 2010). To fill these gaps, this paper shows that the combination of FBT conceptual frames and conceptual blends (Fauconnier 1999; Fauconnier and Turner 1998, 2002) is well-suited for integrating cross-space (concretely, many-space) processing in environmental frames. This research has been carried out within the framework of the project RECORD: Representación del Conocimiento en Redes Dinámicas [Knowledge Representation in Dynamic Networks, FFI2011–22397], funded by the Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation. 2. Frames in terminology Frames are applicable to specialized language as well as general language. A good example is BioFrameNet, which extends the Berkeley FrameNet lexical database to the domain of molecular biology. Dolbey (2009: iii) examines the syntactic and se- mantic combinatorial possibilities of the lexical items used in this domain to better understand the grammatical properties of specialized language. He also mentions that BioFrameNet could be used in natural language processing tasks, such as au- tomatic semantic role labeling. Frame-Based Terminology (FBT) uses frames as well to model the concep- tual event structure of the environmental domain (Faber et al. 2005, 2006, 2007; Faber 2011). However, unlike BioFrameNet, FBT frames are more conceptual than semantic in nature, as shall be seen in this research study. The practical applica- tion of FBT is EcoLexicon, a multimodal terminological knowledge base (http:// ecolexicon.ugr.es), in which environmental concepts are integrated in category templates. Each frame is composed of generic categories (e.g. process, agent, © 2013. John Benjamins Publishing Company All rights reserved Frame blending in specialized language 177 Environmental event Agent Process / state Patient / result Location template template template template located at Natural agent Natural process Patient Geographical area becomes water (movement geographical feature of water, waves, movement (coastine, river, coastine tids, currents) causes seabed, island) Result accretion river modified greo- athmosferic water mass graphical area (wind, storms, etc.) loss seabed material geological affects material island fauna / flora Artifical process affects located at Human agent construction does makes Result addition hard construction (part of, takes place in substraction management of) Instrument movement affects uses Result makes effect attributes of measurement of disciplines for instruments for procedures of representation of simulation of prediction of speed, height time, space study of description of description of Description template Figure 1. The environmental event frame patient, result, instrument, discipline, etc.), which are interrelated within an event (see Figure 1). In this resource, the semantic structure of environmental concepts is based on information extracted from meaning definitions as well from a corpus of specialized texts (Faber et al. 2007: 41). This semantic analysis gener- ates concept hierarchies and configures concepts in frames based on inheritance1 and subframe relations. The Environmental Event (Figure 1) is thus conceived as a dynamic process initiated by a natural or human agent, which affects a patient and produces a result. The notion of dynamic conceptualization is central to Terminology theory (Faber 2011). However, this dynamicity is rarely reflected in the representation of specialized knowledge units, which are more closely related to general knowledge than previously assumed. For example, L’Homme and Polguère (2008: 27) identify seven types of relationships between terms and general language units, and make suggestions as to how to take these specific cases into account in general language dictionaries and databases. Pimentel et al. (2011) also address the problem of how to enrich lexical resources with meanings that belong to specialized knowledge domains. The fact is that both general and specialized knowledge units can be studied with the same semantic approach since in both cases meanings are the result of a dynamic process of meaning construction, which can be explained by using frame © 2013. John Benjamins Publishing Company All rights reserved 178 José Manuel Ureña Gómez-Moreno, Pamela Faber and Miriam Buendía Castro semantics and conceptual blending. As a matter of fact, this paper shows that dy- namic conceptualization is an important aspect of the blended frames that gener- ate the specialized knowledge concept of harmful algal bloom. It also reflects the relevance of figurative language and analogical thought for specialized concept description and comprehension. 3. Frames, mental spaces and blends In Cognitive Linguistics, mental spaces are a proposal for conceptual description. According to Fauconnier (1994, 1997), counter-connections are established be- tween mental spaces by means of projections of conceptual materials. These con- nections help to construct meaning through analogy, metaphor, and concept com- bination. Lakoff and Sweetser (in Fauconnier 1994: x–xi) argue that mental spaces, idealized cognitive models (ICMs), and frames can be integrated into a whole. In fact, frames and ICMs provide relational structure linking semantic roles in men- tal spaces. This paper explains how such roles can bring mental spaces and frames together, as exemplified in harmful algal bloom (hab). The relationship between frames and mental spaces is also reflected in re- search on Blending Theory (Fauconnier 1999; Fauconnier and Turner 1998, 2002; Coulson 2005; Coulson and Oakley 2006; Coulson and Pascual 2006). Inspired by Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    28 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us