Middle Temple Library Brexit bibliography Below is a bibliography of articles which have discussed the legal nature and implications of the UK’s referendum on EU membership and Brexit. This bibliography has been compiled by Middle Temple Library staff and focuses on publications within the library’s collection. March 2016 Karen Harvie and Kenny Scott, ‘EU referendum: Breaking up is hard to do. A recent Norwegian working time case shows how the UK could still be bound by employment directives even if it leaves the EU’ (March 2016) 168 Emp.L.J. 5–7. Matthew Rogers, ‘EU referendum: Lawyers gear up for Brexit battle. The legal market is wise to the impact of a break with Europe, but can it influence the debate’ (1 March 2016) 160 (8) SJ 10. Adrian Mason, ‘A referendum is not the panacea it might seem’ (8 March 2016) 160 (9) SJ 12. Thom Brooks, ‘The legal war of words over the Calais jungle. The migrants' camp across the Channel is working to everyone's advantage in the Brexit debate, and both parties are right – and wrong – in their arguments’ (29 March 2016) 160 (12) SJ 17. Matthew Rogers, ‘The Brexit lawyers: United in cause, divided in opinion. Matthew Rogers speaks to two lawyers with opposing views on the nation's best interests ahead of the EU referendum’ (29 March 2016) 160 (12) SJ 20–22. April 2016 Mark Hatcher, ‘Westminster Watch: Whether the Inners or Outers win the day, the long-standing internecine fighting over Europe will not go away [April 2016] Counsel 9–10. Jan Miller, ‘EU leaflet “not unlawful”’ (15 April 2016) 166 (7694) NLJ 5. Frances Sieber, ‘Brexit is not in the interest of the family lawyer’ (5 April 2016) 160 (13) SJ 12. Robin Tilbrook, ‘In discussion: Brexit. Robin Tilbrook argues that lawyers should vote leave in the upcoming EU referendum’ (19 April 2016) 160 (15) SJ 12. Marina Wheeler QC, ‘The case for Brexit’ (26 April 2016) 160 (16) SJ 20. Middle Temple Library May 2016 Rebecca Bailey-Harris and John Wilson QC, ‘Brexit: To Hell in a handcart – Episode 1’ (May 2016) 46 Fam Law 568–571. David Hodson OBE, ‘Brexit: England and Wales as a global family law leader or EU-emasculated?’ (May 2016) 46 Fam Law 572– 575. Mark Hatcher, ‘Westminster Watch: Is the business of government grinding to a halt as we face up to a spate of elections and the EU referendum and is legislation being pushed through without sufficient scrutiny?’ [May 2016] Counsel 10–11. Evanna Fruithof, ‘EU referendum special: A relationship study. Evanna Fruithof sets the context to the referendum debate with a retrospective and prospective analysis of the UK-EU relationship’ [May 2016] Counsel 18–20. Professor Sir Alan Dashwood QC, ‘EU referendum special: A substantial and binding reform. Professor Sir Alan Dashwood QC assesses the substance and legal character of the reform package negotiated for the UK with the EU’ [May 2016] Counsel 22–23. Martin Howe QC, ‘EU referendum special: The EU debate: in or out?’ [May 2016] Counsel 24–25. Professor Michael Ford QC, ‘Brexit and labour rights – a personal viewpoint’ (May 2016) 1045 IDS Emp. L. Brief 16–18. Tim Eicke and Kate Beaumont, ‘Brexit brainstorming: immigration analysis. How will UK-based citizen fare in the event of a full Brexit?’ (6 May 2016) 166 (7697) NLJ 15–16. Jan Miller, ‘Should all Brit ex-pats vote on Brexit? Call for all British citizens to have right to vote in the EU Referendum’ (6 May 2016) 166 (7697) NLJ 4. William Naunton and Bryan Pickup, ‘Brexit: Perspectives for commercial real estate. William Naunton and Bryan Pickup review the potential implications of a possible exit from the EU’ (May 2016) 341 P.L.J. 16–17. Andrew Holroyd, ‘In discussion: Brexit: Andrew Holroyd puts forward his reasons in favour of the UK remaining in the EU’ (10 May 2016) 160 (18) SJ 12. Middle Temple Library Jonathan Black, ‘In discussion: Brexit. The electorate is being force-fed misinformation about Europe and the HRA’ (24 May 2016) 160 (20) SJ 14. Hellen Kelly, ‘Brexit: are you in or out? It is time for the UK maritime sector to pin its colours to the mast when it comes to membership of the European Union’ [May 2016] The Intelligence 6. June 2016 J. R. Spencer, ‘What would Brexit mean for British criminal justice?’ (22 June 2016) 5 Arch. Rev. 6–9. Richard Kenyon and Olivia Baxendale, ‘EU referendum: Should we stay or should we go? Richard Kenyon and Olivia Baxendale consider how domestic employment law might change if the UK votes to leave the EU’ (June 2016) 171 Emp.L.J. 8–11. Rebecca Bailey-Harris and John Wilson QC, ‘Brexit: To Hell in a handcart – Episode 2’ (June 2016) 46 Fam Law 692–695. Gavin Smith, ‘The Brexit debate: Project fear – no fear’ (June 2016) 46 Fam Law 696–700. Jonathon Manning, ‘Brexit clauses hit the real estate market. Break clauses are likely to be enforced after the Leave vote, but most experts in the stalled market say it will thrive again in the longer run’ (27 June 2016) 30 (26) The Lawyer 8–9. Richard Machin, ‘Social security in the aftermath of the EU referendum. Richard Machin gives an overview of what might happen to social security benefits whether UK citizens vote to leave or stay in the EU’ [June 2016] Legal Action 10–11. Jan Miller, ‘Planning for Brexit’ (10 June 2016) 166 (7702) NLJ 5. Lauren Grest and Mark Surguy, ‘Brexit brainstorming: data privacy’ (10 June 2016) 166 (7702) NLJ 17–18. Cathrine Grubb, ‘Brexit brainstorming: implications for Wales’ (17 June 2016) 166 (7703) NLJ 7. Fionnuala Connolly, ‘Should we stay or should we go?’ (17 June 2016) 166 (7703) NLJ 8. Jan Miller, ‘EU referendum: the EU decides. Lawyers concerned over UK's future post-Brexit’ (24 June 2016) 166 (7704) NLJ 4. Graham Colley, ‘In discussion: Brexit. The EU's legacy of peace and prosperity should be built upon, not forgotten’ (7 June 2016) 22 SJ 12. Middle Temple Library Thom Brooks, ‘Where have Cameron's promised reforms to EU membership gone? The foundations were non-existent for the prime minister’s red card and emergency brake on benefits policies’ (7 June 2016) 22 SJ 15. Matthew Rogers, ‘Immigration lawyers see rise in UK citizenship requests. Amid uncertainty over Britain’s future, European expats fear for their residency status ahead of Brexit vote’ (14 June 2016) 160 (23) SJ 10–11. Giovanni Guglielmetti and Marco Blei, ‘IP litigation and Brexit. Giovanni Guglielmetti and Marco Blei discuss how the outcome of the referendum could affect the new EU-wide patent system’ (14 June 2016) 160 (23) SJ 12. Snigdha Nag, ‘Employment rights: An unseen iceberg in the Brexit debate. Snigdha Nag considers the employment law rights of millions of UK workers to be the number one hidden issue ahead of the EU Referendum’ (14 June 2016) 160 (23) SJ 15. Andrew Kidd, ‘In discussion: Brexit. The EU is not the panacea that Remain would have us believe’ (21 June 2016) 160 (24) SJ 12. Thom Brooks, ‘Telling the real story behind immigration figures. If we’re to solely listen to a misinformed media, then it’s easy to think Brexit is all about jobs or benefits’ (21 June 2016) 160 (24) SJ 17. Matthew Rogers, ‘Lawyers gear up for busy period as UK votes to leave EU. New Conservative government will dictate nature of any reformed relationship with the EU’ (28 June 2016) 160 (25) SJ 10–11. July 2016 Valsamis Mitsilegas, ‘The Uneasy Relationship between the UK and European Criminal Law. From Opt-Outs to Brexit’ (2016) 8 Crim.L.R. 519–538. William Long, ‘Digital departure. William Long assesses the impact of Brexit on data protection legislation in the UK’ (July/August 2016) 68 Co. L.J. 22–24. ‘Focus on Brexit: Brexit – the UK's future relationship with the EU’ (July 2016) 1049, IDS Emp. L. Brief 13–18. Dave Osler, ‘Brexit Blues. What next for shipping, after Britain's vote to leave the EU?’ [July/August 2016] The Intelligence 12–15. Catrin Griffiths, ‘What's next? Planning for the legal world after Brexit. The only certainty in the post-Referendum uncertainty is that firms need to be ready and flexible for the changes and challenges ahead’ (25 July 2016) 30 (30) The Lawyer (Brexit Briefings) 3. Middle Temple Library Lucinda Case, ‘Shaping the post-Brexit world. The UK’s final farewell to the EU may be years away but lawyers in city firms and global businesses must plan for changes now to play a vital role in the post-Brexit world’ (25 July 2016) 30 (30) The Lawyer (Brexit Briefings) 4. Daniel Greenberg, ‘Short-term legislative implications of Brexit. The UK’s statute book is about to get a lot more complicated’ (25 July 2016) 30 (30) The Lawyer (Brexit Briefings) 5. Gregg Beechey and Zac Mellor-Clark, ‘Brexit: what now for alternative fund managers? The UK’s vote to leave the EU raises the question of whether its alternative funds can retain passport rights giving them access to continental markets’ (25 July 2016) 30 (30) The Lawyer (Brexit Briefings) 6. Robert Purves and David Simpson, ‘UK firms face challenge of accessing EU after Brexit. UK financial services firms risk losing their passport to trade freely in Europe following Brexit, but UK regulation is likely to evolve in tandem with EU law’ (25 July 2016) 30 (30) The Lawyer (Brexit Briefings) 7. Tom Bridgford and Peter McCormack, ‘The impact of Brexit on contracts.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages23 Page
-
File Size-