![Finger Joint Replacement by Silicone Rubber Implants and the Concept of Implant Fixation by Encapsulation A](https://data.docslib.org/img/3a60ab92a6e30910dab9bd827208bcff-1.webp)
Ann. rheum. Dis. (1969), 28, Supplement p. 47 FINGER JOINT REPLACEMENT BY SILICONE RUBBER IMPLANTS AND THE CONCEPT OF IMPLANT FIXATION BY ENCAPSULATION A. B. SWANSON Advances in surgical techniques during the past criteria for ideal joint implant replacement are: 10 years have significantly improved the possibility of restoring hand function in arthritic patients. In (1) To maintain joint space. the hands of skilled surgeons, synovial resection, (2) To allow joint motion with stability. restoration of tendon balance, arthrodesis, and re- (3) To be of simple and efficient design. section arthroplasty have been used with reasonable (4) To provide simple and durable fixation. (5) To be resistant to stress and deterioration. success (Bunnell, 1955; Clayton, 1962; Entin, 1964; (6) To be biologically and mechanically acceptable to Flatt, 1968; Riordan and Fowler, 1958; Laine, the host. Sairanen, and Vainio, 1957; Lipscomb and Hender- (7) To be easy to manufacture, sterilize, and use. son, 1961; Swanson, 1961; Vaughan-Jackson, 1962). (8) To facilitate rehabilitation. Attempts to replace joints with metal implants have met with mixed success and limited acceptance, for Joint resection arthroplasty works well in the hand in most cases the bone has not tolerated the metal. if the joint space and alignment can be maintained. Bone absorption and metal corrosion have negated This frequently requires excessive postoperative many of the early good results obtained. However, fixation with pins and external support. The fixa- the concept of prosthetic joint replacement is ex- tion, if overused, will compromise the expected range cellent, since the restoration of early joint motion of useful motion, and in a considerable number of with stability has obvious advantages over resection these cases the joints gradually stiffen and subluxate. arthroplasty or joint fusion (Flatt, 1968). Exceptional results do occur, however, and are re- 6 per cent. of the general population suffer from lated to the development of a supportive fibrous rheumatoid or osteoarthritis and many have dis- joint capsule, organized during the time when a abling hand problems. Also an increasingly large guarded range of motion is allowed. In the finger, percentage of people in our industrial society suffer the proper amount of fiexion-extension, limitation of from traumatic disabilities of the small joints of the lateral movement, and reduction of dorsopalmar hand which would benefit from reconstruction. subluxation is difficult to obtain but necessary for a The industrial development of medical-grade good result. Therefore, one of the most important materials suitable for use in synthetic replacements functions for a successful implant is to maintain has opened up new horizons in reconstructive surgery proper joint alignment internally while allowing early (Wesolowski, Martinez, and McMahon, 1966). motion as this new, functionally adapted, fibrous The physician and biological engineer utilizing capsule matures. By continuing to support the these advancements have improved the prognosis of important fibrous capsule and acting to keep the what were once considered irretrievable physical joint surfaces apart, the implant further serves its disabilities. useful purpose early in the postoperative course. Silicone Rubber Implants Criteria for Joint Implant Replacement The use of silicone rubber for implants replacing Joint replacement problems revolve around the diseased and destroyed joints was suggested by our proper biomechanical design of the implant and the previous experience in developing an intramedullary- development of the ideal implant material. The stemmed silicone rubber implant to cushion the end 47 D Supplement p. 48 ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES Fig. 36.-Silicone amputation implant in below-knee stump. Active patient uses end-bearing type prosthesis. Demonstrates soft tissue and bone tolerance to implant over a continuing period of activity. of the long bone in lower extremity amputations The implantsare madeofa heat-vulcanized medical (Fig. 36). grade silicone elastomer stock (Dow Coming Co. "Silastic") (Fig. 37). They are formed in a mould 6 years' experience in the development of proper at approximately 2500 F. and under 325 lb. implants for joint procedures, utilizing laboratory per sq. in. pressure. They are then cured for animals, laboratory fatigue testing of the materials, several hours at an elevated temperature in an air- and clinical evaluation, has shown silicone rubber circulated oven. The silicone elastomer stock from to have many of the requirement for the ideal im- which the implants are manufactured is extremely plant material (Swanson, 1966). important. The material of choice must provide Silicone rubber is a unique implant material which adequate implant flexibility and have enough comes within the family of silicones (Braley, 1965; strength to maintain joint stability. Various sili- Roberts, 1967). The silicones are a combination cone elastomer stocks were evaluated in the develop- of organic and inorganic materials. By utilizing a ment of a joint replacement implant to determine the chain of silicone and oxygen atoms to which organic stock that would best satisfy the requirements of groups are attached, the chemist is able to blend the implant strength and flexibility. inertness of quartz with the ability of plastics to be fabricated. The silicone rubbers are heat-stable, do Development of a flexible, heat-moulded joint not appear to deteriorate with time, and have no replacement implant of silicone rubber for meta- adhesive characteristics. They possess good flex- carpophalangeal arthroplasties in the rheumatoid ion characteristics and force-damping properties, arthritic hand has proceeded through many changes but will tear easily if a laceration occurs in the sur- in design (Fig. 38). The intramedullary-stemmed face. Correct design of the prosthesis can greatly one-piece design has satisfactorily fulfilled the speci- improve the flexural durability of the silicone rubber fied requirements for joint replacement (Swanson, implant. Machine testing has shown that a one- 1966). It provides a degree of stability, and, piece heat-vulcanized implant has much better wear because of its intrinsic flexibility, can be used as a advantages than a hand-carved or hand-moulded flexible hinge. It is as biologically inert as any implant. The medical-grade silicones with which material known and, being softer than bone, it is not we are dealing do not produce tissue reaction when so likely to stimulate absorption phenomenon as properly sterilized and should not be confused with metal implants. 4 years of testing were involved in industrial silicones that have additives which may be the development of this final design (Fig. 39). The toxic. present implants have been machine-tested for more ARTHROPLASTIES Supplement p. 49 I ZUl 3 Fig. 37.-Silicone implants: (1) finger joints, I (2) trapezium, (3) carpal scaphoid, (4) carpal lunate, (5) radial head, (6) elbow. 4- I. SPONGE I DOUBLE CONCAVED Fig. 38.-Design stage in development of fin- RREL ger joint implant. Heat-moulded one-piece implant of strong, flexible silicone rubber stock has proved successful. MOULDED FLAT 9.LATEST MODEL 373 372 Fig. 39.-Intramedullary-stemmed finger joint implant of best test design. hm Supplement p. 50 ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES than 130 million flexions without evidence of break- with minimal, hypertrophic bone reaction at the down. The implant is relatively inexpensive, easy bone ends. If the intramedullary stem is not fixed to handle, is made in a variety of sizes, and can be by transfixion pins and if the implant is well seated sterilized by autoclaving. so that the collar section of the implant at the cut Silicone rubber causes very little reaction and bone end prevents unnecessary play of the implant, therefore minimal fibroblastic activity takes place bone will grow right up to the implant in a short around the implant itself. The potential movement time (Fig. 40). Within 3 or 4 weeks the implant is of the implant after insertion would be unrestrained well fixed by the surrounding tissues. Postopera- unless protected during the development of the sur- tive positioning and bracing therefore assume rounding fibrous capsule. Silicone rubber should greater importance because of this capsule forma- not be placed immediately beneath the skin but, tion, and an eXTort has been made to aid this in our preferably, under fat, a protective ligament, tendon, postoperative care. or fascia. Because the implant becomes so well stabilized by the encapsulation process, it is felt that no other fixation of the implant is required. In fact any other fixation of the implant is contraindicated. Concept of Fixation by Encapsulation Attempts at fixing the implant, with cross pins, The intramedullary stems of the implant help to maintain alignment and prevent its excessive move- ment. The stems have a piston action, to a very small degree, within the intramedullary canals as the digit flexes and extends. This action prolongs the flex life of the implant, which is markedly de- creased if the stems are fixed in the intramedullary canals. Stability of the joint after arthroplasty with this implant has been good and is dependent in part upon proper tendon balance and the devel- opment of a firm capsule around the arthroplasty. The development of a proper capsule is therefore extremely important in the early stages of healing. The immediate postoperative positioning and control of joint movement
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages9 Page
-
File Size-