A Molecular Phylogeny of the Marine Red Algae (Rhodophyta) Based on the Nuclear Small-Subunit Rrna Gene

A Molecular Phylogeny of the Marine Red Algae (Rhodophyta) Based on the Nuclear Small-Subunit Rrna Gene

Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 7276-7280, July 1994 Plant Biology A molecular phylogeny of the marine red algae (Rhodophyta) based on the nuclear small-subunit rRNA gene Bangiophycidae/Florideophycldae/taxonomy/Kishino-Hasegawa test/Tempkton-Felsenstein test) MARK A. RAGAN*t, CAROLYN J. BIRD*t, ELLEN L. RICEO, ROBIN R. GUTELL§, COLLEEN A. MURPHY*, AND RAMA K. SINGH* *Institute for Marine Biosciences, National Research Council of Canada, 1411 Oxford Street, Halifax, NS Canada B3H 3Z1; tBiological Sciences Branch, Scotia-Fundy Region, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, P. 0. Box 550, Halifax, NS Canada B3J 2S7; and §Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, Campus Box 347, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 Communicated by Richard C. Starr, March 24, 1994 ABSTRACT A phylogeny of marine Rhodophyta has been other problematic groups (14-16). In a general survey of inferred by a number of methods from nucleotide sequences of molecular relationships among marine Rhodophyta, we have nuclear genes encoding small subunit rRNA from 39 species in determined the nucleotide sequence of SSU rDNAs1 from 52 15 orders. Sequence divergences are relatively large, especially representatives in 15 orders and now present inferences on among bangiophytes and even among congeners in this group. phylogenetic relationships within the Rhodophyta. Subclass Bangiophycidae appears polyphyletic, encompassing at least three lineages, with Porphyridiales distributed between MATERIALS AND METHODS two of these. Subclass Florideophycidae is monophyletic, with Hlldenbrandiales, Corallinales, Ahnfeltiales, and a close asso- Plant Materials. At least one species (see Appendix) was ciation ofNemaliales, Acrochaetiales, and Palmariales forming selected from each order except Rhodochaetales (monotypic the four deepest branches. Ceramiales may represent a con- and obscure), Batrachospermales (exclusively freshwater), vergence of vegetative and reproductive morphologies, as and Rhodogorgonales (based on newly discovered genera and family Ceramiaceae is at best weakly related to the rest of the too recently described for inclusion). When possible, orders order, and one ofits members appears to be allied to Gelidiales. were represented by a member of their type genus. To Except for Gigartinales, for which more data are required, the estimate intraordinal variability, several genera or species other florideophyte orders appear distinct and taxonomically were examined in Palmariales, Ceramiales, Gigartinales, justified. A good correlation was observed with taxonomy Gracilariales, and all three bangiophyte orders. Fresh, frozen based on pit-plug ultrastructure. Tests under maximum- (-80oC) and freeze-dried material was used (17). Voucher likelihood and parsimony of alternative phylogenies based on specimens of macroalgae were deposited in the herbarium of structure and chemistry refuted suggestions that Acrochaet- the Institute for Marine Biosciences [NRCC (National Re- iales is the most primitive florideophyte order and that Gelid- search Council of Canada)]. iales and Hildenbrandiales are sister groups. DNA Methods. DNA was extracted (18), and SSU rDNAs were amplified by using eukaryote-specific primers (19) as The Rhodophyta is a large, morphologically diverse assem- described (20). Amplification products were cloned into pUC blage of eukaryotes, with 2500-6000 species in about 680 and sequenced fully on both strands (17). Problematic regions genera (1). Although the division as a whole is well delimited were resolved by use of custom primers, nucleotide ana- (1, 2), its taxonomy at the levels of subclass and order has logues, and/or direct sequencing. been unstable. Traditionally, two subclasses have been rec- Sequence Analysis. Sequences were initially aligned for ognized, Bangiophycidae and Florideophycidae, with four maximum primary- and secondary-structural similarity by and 14 orders, respectively. Recently, the former has been manual iteration against an extensive data base of aligned adjudged untenable (3-5) because it is not distinguished by eukaryote rDNAs (21, 22). Trees were inferred based on this synapomorphic characters. Alternatively, three new sub- initial alignment; the red algal rDNA sequences were reor- classes have been proposed to replace the Bangiophycidae dered in accordance with the most stable features of these and Florideophycidae on the basis of the degree of cellular trees, and the alignment was further adjusted to maximize transformation into spores (6). At the ordinal level (7), six similarities. The new orders have been described since 1978 (8-12), and the alignment was progressively optimized as large classical order Cryptonemiales has been subsumed into new sequences were added to the data base and thereafter the similarly large Gigartinales (13), creating a heterogeneous was largely stabilized by two iterations of tree inference and assemblage of families that requires further resolution. Or- realignment. dinal changes have arisen mainly from increasing apprecia- From 52 red algal rDNAs in our initial data base, we tion of the significance of life-history variations and ultra- selected 39 (Appendix) that provide a broad, balanced sam- structure (5, 7, 9). However, taxonomic instability in ple. Representatives of all 15 available orders and 21 avail- Rhodophyta has also been ascribed to a lack of association able families were included; the majority of sequences ex- with phylogenetic hypotheses, and attempts have been made cluded were of the order Gracilariales, analyzed elsewhere (4, 6, 7) to infer phylogenetic relationships from morpholog- (17). Sequences of cryptomonad nucleomorph rDNAs from ical, anatomical, ultrastructural, life history, and chemical Cryptomonas 4 (23) and Pyrenomonas salina (24) grouped characters. Molecular sequences, particularly of nuclear with bangiophycidean rDNAs and were retained; the corre- genes encoding small subunit rRNA (SSU rDNAs) have proven useful in resolving phylogenetic relationships within Abbreviations: rDNA, DNA encoding ribosomal RNA; SSU, small subunit; NAP complex, Nemaliales-Acrochaetiales-Palmariales complex. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge tTo whom reprint requests should be addressed. payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" IThe sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. GenBank data base (accession nos. given in Appendix). 7276 Downloaded by guest on September 25, 2021 Plant Biology: Ragan et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91 (1994) 7277 Table 1. Ranges of G+C% values for individual sequences in the fastDNAml (28). For all methods, consensus topologies were full, more conservative, and most conservative matrices. used as user trees for calculation of distances, tree lengths, Matrices or likelihoods. Alternative hypotheses of relationships were tested by input ofuser-specified trees with statistical analysis More Most as described by Kishino and Hasegawa (29) for maximum Full conservative conservative likelihood and by Felsenstein (30) following Templeton (31) All sequences 43.1-52.4 43.3-51.8 44.4-50.4 for parsimony. These methods compute the value and stan- All rhodophytes 44.8-52.4 45.0-51.8 45.5-50.4 dard deviation (SD) ofa measure of tree goodness for the best Bangiophytes + tree; alternative hypotheses are rejected if they require a log nucleomorphs 43.1-48.4 43.3-47.7 44.4-47.0 likelihood, or minimum number of steps, of more than 1.% Florideophytes 47.3-52.4 47.8-51.8 47.8-50.4 SD worse. sponding nuclear rDNAs were included as outgroups. Empty RESULTS columns and positions corresponding to amplification prim- ers were removed, yielding a "full" matrix of 43 sequences Complete SSU rDNA exon sequences varied from 1760 x 1787 positions. From this we deleted 18 regions where (Lomentaria baileyana) to 1844 (Porphyra acanthophora) columns were mostly empty, gaps were ambiguous (largely in nucleotides, including 46 nucleotides in amplification prim- variable loop regions), or the alignment was especially prob- ers. In all trees, the most basal rhodophyte branches repre- lematic to obtain a 43 x 1566 "more conservative" matrix. sent rDNAs ofbangiophytes. In maximum-likelihood (Fig. 1) Finally, we removed all remaining positions where secondary and some distance trees, bangiophycidean rDNAs diverge as or higher order structure was not well defined across most three branches, with Compsopogonales, some Porphyridi- eukaryote SSU rDNAs (including stably aligned regions ales, and the cryptomonad nucleomorphs forming the most among some red algae, especially Florideophycidae), yield- basal branch, Bangiales diverging thereafter, and the por- ing a 43 x 1200 "most conservative" matrix. Thereby, the phyridialean unicells Dixoniella and Rhodella diverging G+C% range among all sequences in our matrix was re- third. Parsimony trees (e.g., Fig. 2) differ only in showing and flo- further fragmentation of the most basal branch into two or duced, and the overlap between bangiophycidean three independent branches. Branching order among bangio- rideophycidean rDNAs was eliminated (Table 1). phyte lineages differs slightly in some Fitch-Margoliash Trees were inferred with PHYLIP version 3.5 (25) unless distance and neighbor-joining analyses, probably owing to otherwise indicated, with randomized orders of sequence attraction effects of the long Dixoniella and Rhodella input and global rearrangements. Distances were corrected

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us