Copyright 2011 Sara J. Heimbecker

Copyright 2011 Sara J. Heimbecker

Copyright 2011 Sara J. Heimbecker JOHN CAGE’S HPSCHD BY SARA J. HEIMBECKER DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Musicology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Gayle Magee, Chair Professor Gabriel Solis Professor Thomas Turino Professor Emeritus Nicholas Temperley ii ABSTRACT From 1967-1969, John Cage (1912-1992) was an associate Member of the Center for Advanced Study at the University of Illinois. The appointment came about with the help of Lejaren Hiller, founder of the University of Illinois’ Experimental Music Studio and the co-composer of the first significant computer composition Illiac Suite (1957). Cage’s tenure in Urbana culminated in the production of the multimedia work HPSCHD which he produced in collaboration with Hiller, Calvin Sumsion, and Ron Nameth. Hiller oversaw much of the programming work and functioned as a sounding board for Cage’s compositional ideas. Sumsion supervised the static visual elements used in the performance and later collaborated with Cage on a series of lithographs and plexigrams called Not Wanting to Say Anything about Marcel. Nameth, a filmmaker from the Art Department, organized the motion picture films that were used for the performance. Initially, HPSCHD was a commission from the Swiss harpsichordist Antoinette Vischer who had requested from Cage “a harpsichord piece.” Vischer’s modest commission grew into a huge work that included seven harpsichords, 52 tapes of computer-produced tones, about 8,000 slides and over 40 motion picture films. HPSCHD is an unusual work among Cage’s oeuvre for many reasons. Especially noteworthy is Cage’s large scale use of technology (specifically the computer), the use of historical musical quotations, the theatrical environment of the work, and, perhaps most surprisingly, Cage’s return to earlier compositional ideas. These noteworthy aspects open many avenues of inquiry about the piece, about Cage, and about our assumptions of the composer in the late 1960s. Since the details of the computer programs and the iii history of the programming process have been thoroughly discussed1, my study will not duplicate these efforts, but will draw on available sources to inform the compositional, philosophical, visual, and contextual meanings of the work. In this study, I analyze the production of HPSCHD ethnographically, as an event. I situate the event within the context of postmodern philosophy, anarchic politics, the culture of the university campus of the late 1960s, and the countercultural “summer of love.” Through this type of contextual study, I bring some of the assumptions about Cage into question. Cage intentionally couched his compositions in a wealth of political and philosophical rhetoric. In the late 1960s Cage was highly influenced by his recent rediscovery of Henry David Thoreau and his discovery of the American social philosophy of Marshall McLuhan and Buckminster Fuller. Just as Cage used Asian philosophies to bolster his turn to chance composition in the 1950s, Cage appropriated a vocabulary from Thoreau, McLuhan, and Fuller to legitimize his new work with the computer. Cage characterized HPSCHD as political work of art which was to demonstrate the possibility of an anarchic utopia––a world which had come to terms with its own history and its technology. Using David Patterson’s analysis of Cage’s idiosyncratic use of South Asian philosophical terms2 as a methodological model, I define and clarify terms that Cage used in connection to HPSCHD such as “abundance,” “multiplicity,” “anarchy,” “chaos,” and “interpenetration.” 1 Hiller wrote detailed technical reports (SUNY Buffalo archives, 1972) and an article “Programming the I Ching Oracle,” Computer Studies in the Humanities and Verbal Behavior, 3 (1970): 130-43. William Duckworth covered the programming details in his Ph.D. dissertation Expanding Notational Parameters in the Music of John Cage, (University of Illinois, 1972). 2 David Patterson, Appraising the Catchwords, c. 1942-1959: John Cage's Asian-Derived Rhetoric and the Historical Reference of Black Mountain College (Ph. D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1996). iv For this study, I use a number of previously unpublished primary sources. Cage’s letters from this time period (housed in the John Cage Archives at Northwestern University) are an excellent source. I also draw heavily on the scores and sketches of HPSCHD that are part of the New York Public Library’s Music Collection. Peter Yates was a devoted friend to Cage and authored the liner notes to the HPSCHD recording released simultaneous to the 1969 event. The Peter Yates Papers, housed in the Mandeville Special Collections Library at the University of California, San Diego contain a wealth of information and correspondence between Yates and Cage. The poet and scholar Eric Mottram Papers wrote fairly extensively about Cage and his book Silence. The Eric Mottram Papers (King’s College, London) are valuable insights into Cage’s work simultaneous to the composition of HPSCHD. Personal interviews and e-mail correspondence with a number of “informants” has also proven to be essential to this study. This document includes quite a bit of oral history about Cage, the atmosphere at the University of Illinois in the late 1960s, and the 1969 HPSCHD event. There is evidence that despite the chance operational selection of materials for the event, Cage had specific ideas about how one was to react to the work. Cage designed into the piece elements that were to cause a participatory reaction and were designed to create an atmosphere of inclusiveness for the mostly college-aged audience. Despite the traditional view and some evidence that Cage distanced himself from the countercultural movement, there is evidence that Cage panders to this population to a certain degree with the inclusion of visual elements that are iconic of the Summer of Love and the psychedelic age. As of yet, no one has studied HPSCHD as an event, with equal emphasis on the v visual, the aural, and the participatory aspects of the work. A study of the visual elements of the performance draws on published interviews, unpublished letters, Calvin Sumsion’s graduate thesis from the University of Illinois, and oral accounts from the artists and participants. A study of the slides and films, and how they were produced and selected using consistent chance compositional methods, sheds light on Cage’s conception of HPSCHD as a theater piece. vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my dissertation advisor, Gayle Magee and the rest of my doctoral committee for their continued, long-distance support. I would also like to thank the John Cage Archives in the Music Library at Northwestern University. The librarians were kind enough to open their doors during remodeling to give me access to the entire collection. I am also thankful to King’s College for providing the Eric Mottram Papers used in my study and the New York Public Library for copying the HPSCHD sketches which are part of their music collection. The monks of Saint Bede’s Abbey in Peru, Illinois are especially deserving of thanks for providing a quiet sanctuary for several weeks. In particular I would like to recognize the Guest Master at St Bede’s, Father Marian, for his hospitality and warm friendship. Finally, I would like to thank the many informants who graciously gave their time: Bill Brooks, Joel Chadabe, Stephen Drury, David Eisenman, Charles Hamm, Errol Haun, John Maryn, David Patterson, Vivian Perlis, Ron Resch, Larry Solomon, Richard Taruskin, Nicholas Temperley, Gary Viskupic, and Christian Wolff. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND ILLUSTRATIONS ................................................................ viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION: JOHN CAGE’S HPSCHD (1969) ............................ 1 CHAPTER 2: THE PAST IN THE PRESENT ............................................................. 47 CHAPTER 3: THE COMPUTER IN HPSCHD........................................................... 128 CHAPTER 4: THE PARTICIPATORY POLITICS OF HPSCHD ............................ 179 CHAPTER 5: CAGE MISE-EN-SCÈNE: THEATER THEORY AND HPSCHD..... 222 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION: AFTERLIFE OF HPSCHD ..................................... 279 APPENDIX: SELECTED HPSCHD PERFORMANCES AFTER URBANA ........... 319 BIBLIOGRAPHY: …………………………………………....................................... 328 viii LIST OF TABLES AND ILLUSTRATIONS 2.1 HPSCHD poster designed by Sumsion and illustrated by Gary Viskupic .............. 122 Table 2.1. Tempi translation chart ............................................................................... 123 2.2 Page 83 of Solo V .................................................................................................. 124 2.3. Manuscript page of the Busoni Sonatina no. 2, first movement, translated into ¾ time ................................................................................................................... 125 2.4. Timeline of composers used in HPSCHD, their birth and death dates, and list of possible replacements for Ives ................................................................ 126 2.5. “Erased de Kooning” ............................................................................................ 127 3.1. Hiller and Cage working on HPSCHD with the ILLIAC II system (1968) .......... 172 3.2. “HOW TO CUT SOMEONE IN HALF AND THEN PUT HIM BACK TOGETHER AGAIN” ............................................................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    362 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us