Exonucleolytic Proofreading of Leading and Lagging Strand DNA Replication Errors JOHN D

Exonucleolytic Proofreading of Leading and Lagging Strand DNA Replication Errors JOHN D

Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 88, pp. 3465-3469, April 1991 Genetics Exonucleolytic proofreading of leading and lagging strand DNA replication errors JOHN D. ROBERTS, DAVID C. THOMAS, AND THOMAS A. KUNKEL* Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Communicated by I. Robert Lehman, January 31, 1991 ABSTRACT We have asked whether exonucleolytic proof- the control of the adenovirus major late promoter or was reading occurs during simian virus 40 origin-dependent, bi- purchased from Molecular Biology Resources (Milwaukee, directional DNA replication in extracts ofhuman HeLa cells. In WI). addition, we have compared the fidelity of leading and lagging Replication Reactions. Standard 25-Al reaction mixtures strand DNA synthesis. In a fidelity assay that scores single-base contained 30 mM Hepes (pH 7.8), 7 mM MgCl2, 4 mM ATP, substitution errors that revert a TGA codon in the lacZa gene 200 ,M each CTP, GTP, and UTP, 100 ,M each dATP, in an M13mp vector, providing an excess of a single dNTP dGTP, dTTP, and [a-32P]dCTP (4000 cpm/pmol), 40 mM substrate over the other three dNTP substrates in a replication creatine phosphate, 100 pug ofcreatine phosphokinase per ml, reaction generates dermed, strand-specific errors. Fidelity 15 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5), 40 ng of either measurements with two vectors having the origin ofreplication M13mp2SVA89 ori right or M13mp2SVA89 ori left replica- on opposite sides ofthe opal codon demonstrate that error rates tive form DNA (123 pmol of nucleotide), -1 ,g ofT antigen, for two different AdCTP and T-dGTP mispairs increase when and -75 ,ug of protein from a HeLa cytoplasmic extract. deoxyguanosine monophosphate is added to replication reac- After incubation for 6 hr at 37°C, the reaction was stopped as tion mixtures or when the concentration of deoxynucleoside described (14), 10 IlI was removed and added to 0.5 ml of triphosphates is increased. The data suggest that exonucleolytic ice-cold 10%6 trichloroacetic acid, and the acid-insoluble proofreading occurs on both strands during bidirectional rep- products were collected on aglass fiber filter and analyzed for lication. Measurements using the two simian virus 40 origin- 32P by liquid scintillation counting. The rest of the DNA containing vectors suggest that base substitution error rates are products were collected by precipitation at -20°C in a final similar for replication of the leading and lagging strands. vol of 136 pl in the presence of 20 ,ug of tRNA/1 M ammonium acetate/50% isopropanol. The DNA pellets were The replication of eukaryotic chromosomes is a complicated dried, resuspended in 100 ,ul of TE (10 mM Tris HCI, pH process requiring high fidelity. Studies in higher eukaryotes 8.0/1 mM Na4EDTA), and further purified by extraction with with the simian virus 40 (SV40) system (1-4) suggest that the phenol (2 x 100 pl) followed by diethyl ether (2 x 500 pl). The enzymology at the replication fork is asymmetric-i.e., the DNA was then precipitated as described above (no additional leading and the lagging strands are synthesized by a different tRNA added), dried, and resuspended in TE. Restriction complement of proteins (5-7). A current model (8) suggests enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs and that the leading strand is replicated by DNA polymerase 6 used as described (9). The Dpn I-treated, replicated DNA (pol 8), an enzyme containing an associated 3' 5' exonu- was then used to transfect Escherichia coli strain NR9162, a clease activity (4), while the lagging strand is replicated by mutS form of MC1061, by electroporation with a Bio-Rad DNA polymerase a (pol a), which has generally been isolated Gene Pulser. These cells were plated within 30 min with free of exonucleolytic activity (4). We previously reported CSH50 as the 8-galactosidase a-complementation strain to the development of an assay with which one can examine the yield 2000-10,000 M13mp2SV plaques per plate. Revertant fidelity of a human cell replication complex during bidirec- (blue) plaques were scored and purified as described, and tional, semiconservative DNA synthesis on a circular DNA single-stranded DNA was prepared and sequenced as nec- molecule containing the SV40 origin of replication and the essary. lacZa gene from M13mp2 as a mutational target (9). A similar DNA Templates. The double-stranded M13mp2 DNA mol- system has been described that uses the supF gene as the ecules used as templates were M13mp2SVA89 ori left, which mutational target (10). We found that the replication appa- has been described (9), and M13mp2SVA89 ori right, which ratus is significantly more accurate than the purified pol contains the SV40 origin region (carried on an -200-base-pair a-primase complex isolated from HeLa cells (9). Given the HindIII/Sph I fragment described previously) inserted into high fidelity of the replication complex, we have now used the Bsu36I site within the lacZa gene on the right side of the this assay to examine the replication apparatus for the ability opal codon target. The procedure for inserting the SV40 to proofread errors during replication. In addition, we have origin was the same as described for the original construction manipulated both reaction conditions and the DNA template of M13mp2SV (9). to examine the base substitution fidelity of leading and lagging strand synthesis. RESULTS Opal Codon Reversion Assay. We developed an assay with MATERIALS AND METHODS extracts of human HeLa cells (9) to examine the fidelity of Replication Extracts and Large Tumor Antigen (T Antigen). bidirectional, semiconservative DNA replication ofa circular The HeLa (S3) cell cytoplasmic extract was prepared as M13mp2 DNA molecule containing the SV40 origin of rep- described (11, 12). SV40 large T antigen either was purified lication and the lacZa gene as a mutational target. This as described (12) from HeLa cells infected with an adenovirus fidelity assay scores single-base substitution errors that re- recombinant [R284 (13)] containing the T antigen gene under vert a TGA codon to restore a-complementation of /-galac- The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge Abbreviations: SV40, simian virus 40; T antigen, large tumorantigen; payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" pol a, DNA polymerase a; pol 8, DNA polymerase 8. in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §1734 solely to indicate this fact. *To whom reprint requests should be addressed. 3465 Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 3466 Genetics: Roberts et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 (1991) tosidase activity (scored as a blue plaque phenotype). This mostly monomer circular DNA molecules, with some higher termination codon yields a colorless-plaque phenotype when molecular weight DNA present. Diagnostic restriction endo- the products of a replication reaction are introduced into nuclease digestion (9) demonstrated that the monomer circles bacterial host cells, which are then plated on indicator plates were primarily the result of a single round of replication. to monitor f-galactosidase activity. Base substitution errors The remaining reaction products were digested with Dpn I are detected as blue plaques. The reversion frequency-i.e., to eliminate unreplicated molecules (26), and the newly the proportion of blue to total plaques-reflects the base replicated DNA was used to transfect competent host cells to substitution error rate. score opal codon reversion frequencies (Table 1). Replication Providing an excess of a single dNTP substrate over the using equimolar concentrations of all four dNTPs yielded a other three dNTPs in a replication reaction generates defined, reversion frequency only slightly above the reversion fre- strand-specific errors. For example, excess dGTP leads to quency of unreplicated DNA. Even when dGTP (Exp. 1, 200 T-dGTP transition mispairs at position 89 in one strand ofthe ,uM dGTP) or dCTP (Exps. 2 and 3, 200 ,uM dCTP) was lacZa sequence at the TGA opal codon or at position 87 in the provided in 20-fold excess over the other dNTPs, the rever- opposite strand (Fig. LA). Likewise, excess dCTP results in sion frequency ofreplicated DNA was not significantly above transition mispairs ofA-dCTP at position 89 in one strand and that of unreplicated DNA. These results demonstrate that at position 87 in the other (Fig. 1A). The location ofthe error replication is highly accurate for single-base substitution in any given revertant can be determined by DNA sequence errors. analysis. A role for exonucleolytic proofreading on both Evidence for Exonudeolytic Proofreading During Replica- strands can be examined by adding deoxynucleoside mono- tion. The addition ofdGMP led to an increase in the reversion phosphates, which prevent excision of a nucleotide at the frequency for both pool bias conditions (Table 1). At 1 mM primer terminus (15, 16), or by increasing the concentration dGMP, the effect was .8.6-fold for the dGTP pool bias (Exp. of deoxynucleoside triphosphates, thus increasing the rate of 1) and .28-fold for the dCTP pool bias (Exp. 2). The effect polymerization of the next correct nucleotide onto a mis- of 2 mM dGMP with a dCTP pool bias was even greater, paired template-primer and decreasing the probability of .80-fold (Exp. 3). Since nucleoside monophosphate-induced excision (17-19). infidelity has been taken as strong evidence for exonucle- Replication reactions were performed with excess dGTP or olytic proofreading with DNA polymerases (see ref. 27 and, dCTP in order to force T-dGTP and A-dCTP mispairs (Fig. for review, ref. 28), the simplest interpretation of these data 1A). These mispairs have been shown to be effectively is that proofreading is also occurring during bidirectional proofread by purified enzymes (19-22). To examine the effect replication. Consistent with the interpretation that the dGMP of monophosphates, we chose to add dGMP to the reaction effect was due to end-product inhibition of exonucleolytic mixture, based on its ability to effectively inhibit exonucle- proofreading activity, addition of 1 mM guanosine to a olytic proofreading with purified enzymes (21, 23-25).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us