An Analysis of Colombia's Fact-Checking

An Analysis of Colombia's Fact-Checking

Media and Communication (ISSN: 2183–2439) 2021, Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 264–275 DOI: 10.17645/mac.v9i1.3374 Article Debunking Political Disinformation through Journalists’ Perceptions: An Analysis of Colombia’s Fact-Checking News Practices Carlos Rodríguez-Pérez 1,*, Francisco J. Paniagua-Rojano 2 and Raúl Magallón-Rosa 3 1 Department of Journalism, University of Ibagué, 730002 Ibagué, Colombia; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Journalism, University of Malaga, 29071 Malaga, Spain; E-Mail: [email protected] 3 Department of Communication, Carlos III University of Madrid, 28903 Getafe, Spain; E-Mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author Submitted: 17 June 2020 | Accepted: 27 August 2020 | Published: 3 March 2021 Abstract Fact-checking alliances emerged worldwide to debunk political disinformation in electoral contexts because of social con- cerns related to information authenticity. This study, thus, included the Latin American context in fact-checking journalism studies as a journalistic practice to fight political disinformation. Through analyzing RedCheq, the first fact-checking jour- nalism alliance in an electoral regional context led by Colombiacheck, 11 in-depth interviews were conducted to identify the perceptions of regional fact-checkers regarding the usefulness of this journalistic practice, its achievements, and the key aspects for incorporating fact-checking into the regional media ecosystem. The study results revealed that RedCheq achieved the goal of fighting disinformation, and that fact-checking developed as transformational leverage for the region- al media. Regional journalists perceived fact-checking as an element that restores credibility and social trust in regional media as the epistemology of this journalistic practice neglects the power pressure and dissemination of official narratives. Finally, this study highlighted how fact-checking journalism contributes to the democratic quality and civic empowerment in silenced and polarized environments. In addition, it discussed the need to expand fact-checking journalism’s coverage to new geographical areas and improve journalists’ professional competencies and training, thereby enabling them to func- tion as using verification tools based on regional journalists’ requirements. Keywords Colombia; disinformation; elections; fact-checking; journalism; political communication; political journalism; verification Issue This article is part of the issue “Disinformation and Democracy: Media Strategies and Audience Attitudes” edited by Pere Masip (University Ramon Llull, Spain), Bella Palomo (University of Málaga, Spain) and Guillermo López (University of Valencia, Spain). © 2021 by the authors; licensee Cogitatio (Lisbon, Portugal). This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribu- tion 4.0 International License (CC BY). 1. Introduction and civil society organizations from across the country. These participants attended training workshops to be This study analyzes the fact-checking RedCheq collabo- able to verify content and information during the elec- rative project, which is the first alliance of checkers in toral campaigns; limit the collateral effects of fake and Colombia that was established to fight disinformation deceitful information related to candidates, political par- prevailing in the Colombian regional elections in 2019. ties, and processes and party platforms; and thorough- Online disinformation campaigns threaten fair elections, ly monitor and examine regionally coded electoral pub- which are core processes for achieving the democrat- lic discourses. ic good of accountable political representation (Tenove, The RedCheq collaborative initiative is based on oth- 2020). The initiative was developed in August 2019 er existing initiatives launched by First Draft, such as with the participation of journalists, media, universities, CrossCheck in France, Electionland in the US, Checkpoint Media and Communication, 2021, Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 264–275 264 in India, and Comprobado in Spain. Similar initiatives impact, to consult with the author of the phrase, to com- at the state level have already been established in pare the information and data with official and reliable Latin America in countries such as Mexico (Verificado; sources and then with alternative and expert sources, to Magallón-Rosa, 2019), Brazil (Comprova), Argentina contextualize the checking in terms of time and socioeco- (Reverso), and Uruguay (Verificado). RedCheq was head- nomic or political aspects, and to qualify the statement ed by Colombiacheck, a digital, open, and collabora- (true, slightly true, questionable, fake, or uncheckable). tive fact-checking platform signatory of the Code of Further, this study incorporates the Latin American Principles of the International Fact-Checking Network context to fact-checking journalism studies through and Consejo de Redacción, a nonprofit organization that in-depth interviews of journalists within the network. counts among its ranks more than 100 associated jour- As academic attention is mainly focused on the English- nalists in Colombia to foster research journalism and con- speaking countries, it is imperative for new approaches tribute to the democratization of information. to be developed in order to define and compare the fact- In Colombia, the exercise of the journalist profes- checking and disinformation systems (Hallin & Mancini, sion suffered the consequences of the armed conflict. 2004). Vázquez-Herrero, Vizoso, and López-García (2019) Cartografías de la información, conducted by Fundación analyzed 135 fact-checking initiatives from across the para la Libertad de Prensa (2019), a nonprofit organi- world and concluded that most of the fact-checking plat- zation that defends press freedom and the practice of forms are European and American native digital media; journalism, presents the following alarming conclusion: they found that their regional coverage scope is only 578 out of the 994 analyzed municipalities correspond 9%. At the beginning of May 2020, it was estimated that to silenced zones, i.e., places where there is no media 237 teams devoted to fact-checking were active world- outlet to produce local journalism, and 29% of the pop- wide, with 26 teams in South America: Argentina (2), ulation resides in such places. Gentzkow, Shapiro, and Bolivia (1), Brazil (10), Chile (2), Colombia (3), Ecuador (1), Sinkinson (2011) stated that media outlets positively Peru (2), Uruguay (3), and Venezuela (2; Duke Reporters’ influence political participation, particularly when the Lab, 2020). Only 78 of these fact-checking journalistic first outlet is established. organizations were signatories of the Code of Principles A recent study on the working conditions in of the International Fact-checking Network. Colombian regional journalism (Valencia-Nieto, Pereira- González, & Rodríguez-Leuro, 2019) that was based on 1.1. Colombian Political Context 139 interviews depicts regional journalism as a poor trade where journalists are subjected to power pressures The first regional elections since the peace agreements and disseminate official narratives; therefore, regional with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia in journalism is at its critical levels of credibility because it 2016 were held on October 27th, 2019. According to the is unable to examine power thoroughly. Consequently, National Civil Registry Office’s (2019) data, Colombians its contribution to democratic quality is insignificant. elected a total of 1,101 mayors, 32 governors, 12,063 Colombia had already experienced a disinforma- city councilors, 418 representatives, and 6,814 elect- tion context during the October 2nd, 2016 referendum ed officials. To this end, 3,306 elections were held to on peace agreements. As Pablo Medina-Uribe (2018) vote for local authorities. The main participation data recalls: revealed that 60.65%, which equals 22,1 million of Colombians based on the census of 36,5 million peo- During the autumn of 2016, a prominent politician ple, exercised their right to vote in order to nominate admitted having deliberately deceived the audience their mayor. Participation in the election of the depart- before one of the most important elections in the his- mental governors was 61%, with 18,8 million of votes tory of the country. By doing so, he confirmed what being cast on the basis of a census of 30,8 million many citizens already knew: WhatsApp, a digital com- of Colombians. munication platform, which is now widely used, is a The Electoral Observation Mission (2019) witnessed fertile ground for group manipulation. the progress made in the exercise of the right to vote— thanks to the “conclusive progress in terms of safe- Further, Colombiacheck and Consejo de Redacción guar- ty related to noninterference by the armed groups in anteed the regional journalists’ training by organizing the elections…civic engagement, electoral debate, and 10 workshops in Casanare, Santander, Cesar, Tolima, the results of authorities in chasing electoral crimes.” Caldas, and Valle del Cauca, among others, which ended However, this aspect does not conceal the irregularities in a Chequeatón in Bogota (August 13th and 14th, 2019), detected during the previous months such as electoral and established RedCheq. In addition, the fact-checking transhumance or fraud committed on the election day. process was supervised, edited, and sponsored using the Colombia conducted the regional elections in a Colombiacheck methodology. political context marked by

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us