Appendix C- ECOTOX Bibliography A number (22) of studies identified by ECOTOX were reviewed while preparing the CRLF effects determination for methyl parathions. Studies were selected for based on: 1) data gaps in registrant-submitted guideline studies available at the time of the assessment, 2) relevant endpoints lower than those provided by registrant submitted guideline studies available at the time of the assessment, 3) endpoints for taxa important to the overall conclusions of the risk assessment, but not well represented by registrant-submitted guideline studies. In some cases, information contained in the study was not useful, and no open literature review summary was prepared. These are designated as (No Review). Studies that were reviewed are designated as QUAN (acceptable for quantitative use in the risk assessment (i.e., calculation of RQs); QUAL (acceptable for qualitative use in the risk assessment (i.e., provide lines of evidence useful in evaluating risk)), or INV (not acceptable for any use in the risk assessment). Studies may be invalidated for many reasons, but most commonly it is due to concerns regarding data quality. Studies reviewed are listed below, and open literature review summaries are included in Appendix B of this document. Studies listed as acceptable to ECOTOX and OPP, but not reviewed had endpoints higher than the ones used as assessment endpoints. Aquatic Plants E4008 (Schafer, et al, 1994) and E4335 (Schafer et. al, 1993). QUAN-data from static tests; INV-data from flow-through tests (flow through test experimental design). E17302 (Rosakutty and Kumaraguru 1994). QUAL (test on end-use product) Aquatic Invertebrates E14996 (Fernandez-Casalderrey, et al., 1995) INV (concentrations not analytically verified, reported endpoint 3-5 orders of magnitude lower than other tests with the same organism). Several related studies by the same group of authors report the same endpoint.(E4340 Fernandez-Casalderrey, et al., 1993; E5096 Fernandez-Casalderrey, et al., 1992; E6857 Fernandez-Casalderrey, et al., 1993). Additional studies were reviewed, but separate open literature review summaries were not prepared. E91481 (Dusquesne 2006) QUAN (methyl paraoxon) E64955 (Anderson and Lydy 2002). QUAL (mixture data) Fish E5401 (Benke 1974) Not useful, pesticide administered by intraperitoneal injection. No open literature review summary prepared. Frogs E1885 (Mohanty-Hejmadi and Dutta 1981). Reviewed. Did not provide useful information because specific concentration tested cannot be determined from article (double review from ECOTOX abstractors resulted in no reported endpoint in the database. C-1 E9226 (Alam and Shafi 1991). QUAL (end-use product) E9920 (Nayeemunnisa and Yasmeen 1986). Reviewed, did not provide information useful for assessment due to type of endpoint. No open literature review summary prepared. E12043 (Yasmeen and Nayeemunnisa 1985) INV-LC50 endpoint (sufficient details not provided for verification); QUAL (sub-lethal effects) E52442 (Mudgall and Patil 1987) QUAL- LC50, NOAEC and LOAEC E65895 (Sampath et. al, 2002) QUAL-LC50 and sublethal endpoints. Related publication E66399 (Kennedy and Sampath 2001). E66399 (Kennedy and Sampath 2001) QUAL-Acute LC50, extended exposure (4th Gosner stage) LC50. Related study E65895 (Sampath et. al, 2002). Terrestrial Invertebrates E70351 (Atkins and Kellum 1986) QUAL-LDx data for larvae, INV-Adult LD50 (sufficient details not provided for verification) E79198 (Fiedler, L. 1987) QUAL-Effects of ingestion of contaminated food item, INV-LD50 (sufficient details not provided for verification). E91623 (Kumar and Kumar 1994). QUAN-LD50. Birds E38447 (Rattner and Franson 1984) QUAN-LD50 E39539 (Buerger et. al., 1994) QUAN-LD50 C-2 Methyl Parathion/Methyl Paraoxon Papers that Were Accepted for ECOTOX Acceptable for ECOTOX and OPP 1. Abd-Elghafar, S. F., Dauterman, W. C., and Hodgson, E. (1989). In Vivo Penetration and Metabolism of Methyl Parathion in Larvae of the Tobacco Budworm, Heliothis virescens (F.) Fed Different Host Plants. Pestic.Biochem.Physiol. 33: 49-56. EcoReference No.: 91615 Chemical of Concern: MP; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: MOR,ACC; Rejection Code: OK TARGET(MP). 2. Abu-Qare, A. W. and Abou-Donia, M. B. (2001). Inhibition and Recovery of Maternal and Fetal Cholinesterase Enzyme Activity Following a Single Cutaneous Dose of Methyl Parathion and Diazinon, Alone and in Combination, in Pregnant Rats. J.Appl.Toxicol. 21: 307-316. EcoReference No.: 85502 Chemical of Concern: DZ,MP; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: BCM; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP),OK(DZ). 3. Agnello, A. M., Spangler, S. M., Reissig, W. H., Lawson, D. S., and Weires, R. W. (1992). Seasonal Development and Management Strategies for Comstock Mealybug (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in New York Pear Orchards. J.Econ.Entomol. 85: 212-225. EcoReference No.: 73713 Chemical of Concern: MOM,CPY,CBL,MP,AZ,ES,RSM,EFV,MVP; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: POP,MOR; Rejection Code: OK TARGET(MOM),TARGET(RSM,EFV,AZ,CBL,MP). 4. Aguayo, M. I. and Villaneueva, F. R. (1985). Susceptibility of Meterorus hyphantriae Riley to Methyl Parathion. Southwest.Entomol. 10: 107-109. EcoReference No.: 91473 Chemical of Concern: MP; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: MOR; Rejection Code: OK TARGET(MP). 5. Ahmad, M. M., Sahar, L., Nasir, F., and Minhas, R. (2000). Pesticide-Induced Changes in Secretory Activity of the Thyroid Gland in Rats. Pak.J.Zool. 32: 333-336. EcoReference No.: 77497 Chemical of Concern: FNV,PDM,MP,FPP,CYP; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: GRO,BCM; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP),OK(PDM,FPP),NO CONC(CYP,FNV). 6. Ahmed, W. (1976). The Effectiveness of Predators of Rice Field Mosquitoes in Relation to Pesticide Use in Rice Culture. Ph.D.Thesis, University of California, Davis, CA 55 p. EcoReference No.: 60691 Chemical of Concern: PRN,CPY,MLT,CuS,MCPA,EDT,DU,MP,CBF; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: MOR,POP,REP; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP,CPY),OK(ALL CHEMS). C-3 7. Ahmed, W. and Washino, R. K. (1976). Toxicity of Pesticides Used in Rice Culture in California to Gambusia affinis (Baird and Girard). In: Ph.D.Thesis, Univ.of California, Davis, CA 15-31. EcoReference No.: 17722 Chemical of Concern: PRN,CBF,CPY,MP,CuS,MCPA,EDT,DU,MLT; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: MOR; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(CBF,MP),NO CONTROL(MLT,CuS). 8. Alam, M. N. ( 1998). Toxicity of Metacid to Fingerlings of Fish Catla catla. Environ.Ecol. 16: 267-268. EcoReference No.: 19255 Chemical of Concern: MP; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: MOR; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP). 9. Alam.M.N. and Shafi, M. (1990). Toxic Responses of Loach Lepidocephalus guntea to the Pesticide Metacid. Environ.Ecol. 8(4): 1323-1324. EcoReference No.: 289 Chemical of Concern: MP; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: MOR; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP). 10. Alam, M. N. and Shafi, M. (1992). Toxicity of Metacid to Tubifex. Bangladesh J.Zool. 20: 355-357. EcoReference No.: 91443 Chemical of Concern: MP; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: MOR; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP). 11. Alam, M. N. and Shafi, M. (1991). Toxicity of Two Agricultural Chemicals Metacid 50 and Ekalux EC 25 to Tadpoles of Rana tigrina. Environ.Ecol. 9: 870-872. EcoReference No.: 9226 Chemical of Concern: MP; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: MOR; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP). 12. Albaugh, D. W. (1972). Insecticide Tolerances of Two Crayfish Populations (Procambarus acutus) in South- Central Texas. Bull.Environ.Contam.Toxicol. 8: 334-338. EcoReference No.: 2029 Chemical of Concern: MP; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: PHY; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP). 13. Anderson, T. D. and Lydy, M. J. (2002). Increased Toxicity to Invertebrates Associated with a Mixture of Atrazine and Organophosphate Insecticides. Environ.Toxicol.Chem. 21: 1507-1514. EcoReference No.: 64955 Chemical of Concern: ATZ,DZ,CPY,MP; Habitat: AT; Effect Codes: ACC,MOR,BCM; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(DZ,ATZ,CPY,MP). 14. Apperson, C. S., Elston, R., and Castle, W. (1976). Biological Effects and Persistence of Methyl Parathion in Clear Lake, California. Environ.Entomol. 5: 1116-1120. EcoReference No.: 12115 Chemical of Concern: MP; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: ACC,GRO,POP,MOR; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP). C-4 15. Apperson, C. S., Yows, D., and Madison, C. (1978). Resistance to Methyl Parathion in Chaoborus astictopus from Clear Lake, California. Entomol.Soc.Am. 71: 772-773. EcoReference No.: 91859 Chemical of Concern: MP; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: MOR,POP; Rejection Code: OK TARGET(MP). 16. Atallah, Y. H. and Ishak, M. M. (1971). Toxicity of Some Commonly Used Insecticides to the Snail Biomphalaria alexandrina, Intermediate Host of Schistosoma mansoni in Egypt. Z.Angew.Entomol. 69: 102-106. EcoReference No.: 6332 Chemical of Concern: DDT,MP,CBL; Habitat: A; Effect Codes: MOR,PHY; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP,CBL),OK(DDT). 17. Atkins, E. L. and Kellum, D. (1986). Comparative Morphogenic and Toxicity Studies on the Effect of Pesticides on Honeybee Brood. J.Apic.Res. 25: 242-255 . EcoReference No.: 70351 Chemical of Concern: AND,DZ,Naled,MVP,MLN,BMY,DS,CYT,DMT,FNV,PPG,PMR,OXD,FTT,MOM,EN,ES,CPY,ACP ,MP,CBL,Captan; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: MOR,GRO,PHY; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(Naled,MLN,DMT,MP,FNV),OK(ALL CHEMS). 18. Atkins, E. L., Kellum, D., and Atkins, K. W. (1978). Encapsulated Methyl Parathion Formulation is Highly Hazardous to Honey Bees. Am.Bee J. 483-485. EcoReference No.: 35012 Chemical of Concern: MP; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: BEH,MOR; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP). 19. Attencia, V. M., Ruvolo-Takasusuki, M. C. C., and DeToledo, V. A. A (2005). Esterase Activity in Apis mellifera After Exposure to Organophosphate Insecticides (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sociobiology 45: 587-595. EcoReference No.: 89010 Chemical of Concern: MP,MLN; Habitat: T; Effect Codes: BCM,MOR; Rejection Code: LITE EVAL CODED(MP),NO ENDPOINT(MLN). 20. Aulerich, R. J., Ringer, R. K., and Safronoff, J. (1987). Primary and Secondary Toxicity of Warfarin, Sodium Monofluoroacetate, and Methyl Parathion in Mink.