Herbivory Across Vascular Plants Macroecological And

Herbivory Across Vascular Plants Macroecological And

Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on May 30, 2014 Macroecological and macroevolutionary patterns of leaf herbivory across vascular plants Martin M. Turcotte, T. Jonathan Davies, Christina J. M. Thomsen and Marc T. J. Johnson Proc. R. Soc. B 2014 281, 20140555, published 28 May 2014 Supplementary data "Data Supplement" http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/suppl/2014/05/27/rspb.2014.0555.DC1.h tml References This article cites 51 articles, 18 of which can be accessed free http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/281/1787/20140555.full.html#ref-list-1 Subject collections Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections ecology (1660 articles) evolution (1777 articles) Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top Email alerting service right-hand corner of the article or click here To subscribe to Proc. R. Soc. B go to: http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on May 30, 2014 Macroecological and macroevolutionary patterns of leaf herbivory across vascular plants 1 2 1,3 rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Martin M. Turcotte , T. Jonathan Davies , Christina J. M. Thomsen and Marc T. J. Johnson1 1Department of Biology, University of Toronto-Mississauga, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 1C6 2Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1B1 3 Research Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5 The consumption of plants by animals underlies important evolutionary and Cite this article: Turcotte MM, Davies TJ, ecological processes in nature. Arthropod herbivory evolved approximately Thomsen CJM, Johnson MTJ. 2014 415 Ma and the ensuing coevolution between plants and herbivores is cred- Macroecological and macroevolutionary ited with generating much of the macroscopic diversity on the Earth. In patterns of leaf herbivory across contemporary ecosystems, herbivory provides the major conduit of energy vascular plants. Proc. R. Soc. B 281: 20140555. from primary producers to consumers. Here, we show that when averaged across all major lineages of vascular plants, herbivores consume 5.3% of the http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0555 leaf tissue produced annually by plants, whereas previous estimates are up to 3.8 higher. This result suggests that for many plant species, leaf herbiv- Â ory may play a smaller role in energy and nutrient flow than currently thought. Comparative analyses of a diverse global sample of 1058 species Received: 6 March 2014 across 2085 populations reveal that models of stabilizing selection best Accepted: 1 May 2014 describe rates of leaf consumption, and that rates vary substantially within and among major plant lineages. A key determinant of this variation is plant growth form, where woody plant species experience 64% higher leaf herbivory than non-woody plants. Higher leaf herbivory in woody species Subject Areas: supports a key prediction of the plant apparency theory. Our study provides insight into how a long history of coevolution has shaped the ecological and ecology, evolution evolutionary relationships between plants and herbivores. Keywords: grazing, plant defence evolution, plant–herbivore interactions, 1. Introduction primary consumption, Ornstein–Uhlenbeck, Plant–herbivore interactions underlie some of the most important evolutionary trophic interactions and ecological processes in nature [1–3]. Arthropod herbivores have been con- suming plants for over 415 Myr [4]. This long history of interaction, coupled with negative effects of herbivores on plant fitness [5], are credited with pro- Author for correspondence: moting the macroevolutionary diversification of defensive traits and elevating speciation rates in plants [3,6]. In turn, diversification of plant defences and Martin M. Turcotte species has promoted the diversification and specialization of herbivores e-mail: [email protected] [7,8]. Thus, plant–insect coevolution is thought to have given rise to much of the macroscopic diversity of life on the Earth [3,9,10]. Contemporary herbivore communities continue to have large ecological impacts on plant productivity, population dynamics, community composition, energy flow and nutrient cycling [2,11–15]. Despite the importance of plant–herbivore interactions for ecological and ecosystem processes, we lack robust estimates of rates of herbivory and how herbivory varies between major plant lineages, as well as among plants that differ in life-history traits. Previous estimates of the mean annual rate of leaf herbivory across plants range between 10 and 20% [1,13,16,17]. These estimates Electronic supplementary material is available are limited by the number and taxonomic breadth of species examined. Here, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0555 or we compile and compare variation in rates of leaf herbivory across a wide taxo- nomic breadth of vascular plant species. The mean per cent damage via http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org. experienced across plant species provides important ecological insights into how much plant primary production is lost to higher macroscopic herbivores & 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved. Downloaded from rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org on May 30, 2014 or decomposed by detritivores in terrestrial ecosystems. methods. Specifically, we asked: (i) What is the average 2 Species-specific data can be used to analyse patterns of her- amount of leaf herbivore damage received annually by vascu- rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org bivory in a phylogenetic context and explore whether lar plants? (ii) What macroevolutionary processes best explain macroevolutionary history predicts contemporary patterns variation in leaf herbivory among plant lineages? (iii) How do of herbivory. A better understanding of the importance of plant life history and plant growth form influence natural evolutionary history for rates of leaf herbivory can thus rates of damage? The answers to these questions provide help to explain variation in nutrient and energy fluxes critical insights into the macroevolutionary processes that among ecosystems that differ in species composition [18], as have shaped macroecological patterns of plant–herbivore well as the traits that might cause such variation. interactions across vascular plants. Comparing rates of damage across species can help resolve one of the most important unanswered questions in the study of plant–herbivore interactions: why do species Proc. R. Soc. B vary so dramatically in their susceptibility to herbivores 2. Material and methods [1,19–21]? With the realization that plant secondary metab- (a) Leaf herbivory data acquisition olites play the dominant role in plant defence [22,23], it was A major challenge in estimating rates of consumption is that her- initially believed that plants evolve to minimize damage bivores attack every part of the plant, yet not all tissues are easily 281 and that variation among lineages was due to the presence observed. For example, damage to leaves is relatively easy to : 20140555 of different secondary metabolites and insect counter- quantify, while herbivory on flowers and fruits is complicated adaptations [9,24,25]. It was soon realized, however, that by their ephemeral production, and quantifying root herbivory this view was too simplistic and did not account for the on many species is virtually impossible [31–33]. Similarly, wide diversity of plant traits and life-history characteristics arthropods exhibit diverse feeding habits, from chewing entire that also affect a plant’s susceptibility and evolution of tissues, to mining, to extracting out the contents of cells, plant defences against herbivores. One of the first attempts phloem and xylem. Here, we focused on estimates of per cent leaf herbivory. This approach was based on three considerations: to create a predictive framework that accounted for such (i) leaf herbivory is important for fitness and ecosystem pro- complexity was the plant apparency theory (PAT) [26,27]. ductivity [5,14,34,35]; (ii) it is a robust estimate of herbivory PAT predicts that woody species and other long-lived from a critically important feeding guild and (iii) it is the tissue plants are more ‘apparent’ to herbivores and thus suffer from which herbivory is most commonly measured across more persistent attack than ‘unapparent plants’ [28], which species (see the electronic supplementary material). subsequently causes selection for different types of defence On 28 October 2011, we searched titles, abstracts and key- [26]. Subsequent empirical research has not found strong sup- words in the SciVerse Scopus database (www.scopus.com) for port for the prediction that variation in apparency leads to studies using a series of related combinations of terms for herbiv- the evolution of different types of defences [1,19]. However, ory (see the electronic supplementary material for details). Of the tests of the prediction that apparent plants receive more 3371 studies identified, we focused on those from the 50 most fre- damage than unapparent plants remain rare. The few studies quent journals (electronic supplementary material, table S6), as well as studies that measured underrepresented lineages (e.g. that have tested this prediction failed to support the theory gymnosperms). This narrowed the search to 1700 studies. We [28,29]. However, these studies focused mostly on a single then determined whether these studies met our data selection growth

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    43 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us