Fox News Network Response to Smartmatic

Fox News Network Response to Smartmatic

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2021 05:13 PM INDEX NO. 151136/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 683 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) Index No. 151136/2021 SMARTMATIC USA CORP., SMARTMATIC ) INTERNATIONAL HOLDING B.V., and SGO ) I.A.S. Part 58 CORPORATION LIMITED, ) ) Motion Seq. No. 001 Plaintiffs, ) ) -against- ) ) ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED FOX CORPORATION, FOX NEWS NETWORK, ) LLC, LOU DOBBS, MARIA BARTIROMO, ) JEANINE PIRRO, RUDOLPH GIULIANI, and ) SIDNEY POWELL, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF FOX DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND CPLR §§3211(a)(1), (a)(7), and (g) Paul D. Clement (pro hac vice pending) Steven G. Mintz Erin E. Murphy (pro hac vice pending) Mintz & Gold LLP K. Winn Allen, P.C. (pro hac vice pending) 600 Third Avenue KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 25th Floor 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. New York, NY 10016 Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: 212.696.4848 Telephone: 202.289.5000 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Mark R. Filip, P.C. (pro hac vice pending) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 300 North LaSalle Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: 312.862.2000 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants Fox Corporation and Fox News Network, LLC 1 of 85 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2021 05:13 PM INDEX NO. 151136/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 683 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 LEGAL STANDARD ..................................................................................................................... 2 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 3 I. The Claims Against Fox Challenge Speech Protected By The First Amendment. ............................................................................................................ 3 II. Smartmatic Failed To Allege Actual Malice. ........................................................ 12 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................. 14 ii 2 of 85 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2021 05:13 PM INDEX NO. 151136/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 683 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2021 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases 600 W. 115th St. Corp. v. Von Gutfeld, 80 NY2d 130 [1992] ..................................................................................................................2 Barry v. Time, 584 F Supp 1110 [ND Cal 1984] ...........................................................................................5, 8 Bradley v. Heath, 12 Pick. 164 [Mass. 1831] .........................................................................................................5 Brian v. Richardson, 87 NY2d 46 [1995] ....................................................................................................................7 Campo Lindo for Dogs v. N.Y. Post, 65 AD2d 650 [3d Dept 1978] ....................................................................................................7 Cox Broad. Corp. v. Cohn, 420 US 469 [1975] .....................................................................................................................5 Croce v. N.Y. Times, 930 F3d 787 [6th Cir 2019] .......................................................................................................4 Dickey v. CBS, 583 F2d 1221 [3d Cir 1978].......................................................................................................7 Edwards v. National Audubon Society, 556 F2d 113 [2d Cir 1977]............................................................................................... passim Freeze Right Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Servs. v. City of New York, 101 AD2d 175 [1st Dept 1984] ................................................................................................11 Fridman v. BuzzFeed, 172 AD3d 441 [1st Dept 2019] ................................................................................................11 Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 US 323 [1974] .................................................................................................................6, 8 Greenberg v. Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27 [2d Dept 2017] ....................................................................................................3 Harte-Hanks Commc’ns v. Connaughton, 491 US 657 [1989] ...................................................................................................................13 iii 3 of 85 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2021 05:13 PM INDEX NO. 151136/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 683 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2021 Hogan v. Herald Co., 58 NY2d 630 [1982] ..................................................................................................................6 Hogan v. Herald Co., 84 AD2d 470 [4th Dept 1982] ...................................................................................................6 Holy Spirit Ass’n for Unification of World Christianity v. N.Y. Times, 49 NY2d 63 [1979] ..................................................................................................................11 Konikoff v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 234 F3d 92 [2d Cir 2000]...........................................................................................................6 Krauss v. Champaign News Gazette, 375 NE2d 1362 [Ill App Ct 1978] .............................................................................................5 Landmark Commc’ns v. Virginia, 435 US 829 [1978] .....................................................................................................................5 Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Cent. Sch. Dist., 91 NY2d 577 [1998] ..................................................................................................................2 Mayrant v. Richardson, 10 S.C.L. 347 [S.C. Con. Ct. App. 1818] ..................................................................................5 McDougal v. Fox News Network, 489 F Supp 3d 174 [SD NY 2020] ...........................................................................................13 Medico v. Time, 643 F2d 134 [3d Cir 1981]...................................................................................................7, 11 Miami Herald Publ’g v. Tornillo, 418 US 241 [1974] ...................................................................................................................10 Miner v. Detroit Post and Tribune, 49 Mich. 358 [1882] ..................................................................................................................5 N.Y. Times v. Sullivan, 376 US 254 [1964] .....................................................................................................................2 Norton v. Glenn, 580 Pa. 212 [2004] .....................................................................................................................7 Orr v. Lynch, 60 AD2d 949 [3d Dept 1978] ....................................................................................................7 Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps, 475 US 767 [1986] .................................................................................................................5, 6 iv 4 of 85 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/2021 05:13 PM INDEX NO. 151136/2021 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 683 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2021 Price v. Viking Penguin, 881 F2d 1426 [8th Cir 1989] .....................................................................................................5 Sackler v. Am. Broad. Cos., 2021 WL 969809 [Sup Ct, New York County, Mar. 9, 2021] ..................................................3 St. Amant v. Thompson, 390 US 727 [1968] ...................................................................................................................13 State v. Burnham, 9 N.H. 34 [1837] ........................................................................................................................5 Stern v. News Corp., 2010 WL 5158635 [SD NY Oct. 14, 2010] .............................................................................12 Sunshine Sportswear & Elecs. v. WSOC Television, 738 F Supp 1499 [D SC 1989] ...................................................................................................5 Time v. Pape, 401 US 279 [1971] .....................................................................................................................5 In re United Press Int’l, 106 BR 323 [DDC 1989] ...........................................................................................................5 Ward v. News Grp. Int’l, 733 F Supp 83 [CD Cal 1990] ...................................................................................................5 Weiner v. Doubleday & Co., 74 NY2d 586 [1989] ..................................................................................................................6 Statutes Civ. Rights Law §74 ................................................................................................................10, 11 Civ. Rights Law §76-a ...............................................................................................................2, 12 Rules CPLR 3211[a][1] .............................................................................................................................3

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    85 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us