54Th HIGHWAY GEOLOGY SYMPOSIUM BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SEPTEMBER 24-26, 2003

54Th HIGHWAY GEOLOGY SYMPOSIUM BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SEPTEMBER 24-26, 2003

54th HIGHWAY GEOLOGY SYMPOSIUM BURLINGTON, VERMONT, SEPTEMBER 24-26, 2003 PROCEEDINGS SPONSORED BY: VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VERMONT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT NORWICH UNIVERSITY TABLE OF CONTENTS 54th HGS Introductory Letter……………………………………………………………………… I History, Organization and Function……………………………………………………………….II Local Organizing Committee Members……………………………………………………...…....V Steering Committee Officers………………………………………………………………………VI Steering Committee Members……………………………………………………………............VII Emeritus Members………………………………………………………………………………....XI Medallion Aware Winners………………………………………………………………………..XII Sponsors……………………………………………………………………………………..........XIII Exhibitors…………………………………………………………………………………………XVI Future Symposium Schedule……………………………………………………………….........XIX Symposium Information and Agenda……………………………………………………............XX Proceedings Papers Geotechnical Explorations – Great River Bridge……………………………………...……1 John F. Szturo Economic Benefits of Seismic Refraction Investigations for Road-cut Design Studies……………………………………………………………….......18 Paul Fisk, Kitty Breskin PE Rock bolting, Perspectives from a State DOT…………………………………………..…25 Marc Fish, PG Seven S’s Of Geotechnical Doom………………….………………………………………36 G. Michael Hager Recent Sinkhole Occurrences Along Highways in East Tennessee, A Historical Perspective……………………………….…………………………………...46 Harry L. Moore Living with Landslides on the Big Sur Coast: The Challenges of Maintaining Highway 1…………….…………………………………56 John D. Duffy, Aileen Loe, Morgan Gaudioso Earthquake Ground Motion for Design of the Hoover Dam Bypass Bridge (US Highway 93)……………………………………………..………………………….…71 Jeffrey R. Keaton The Industrial Parkway – So You Want to Build a Road in Mine Spoils…………...……88 Scott L. Murray, PE Leveraging Existing Infrastructure: Using What Is Already in the Ground………….….99 Ed Kase, Tim Ross, Jozef Descour, and Don Green Rock Slope Scaling and Aesthetic Stabilization of two Historically Sensitive Palisades Sill Slopes in Weehawken, New Jersey……………………………………......109 Daniel Journeaux, Pierre Rousseau, Mark McNeilly, Jay Smerekanicz and Peter Ingraham Using GPR Reflection Patterns And NP Measurements To Predict Sinkhole Risk In Central Florida………………………………………………………...118 Angela L. Adams, Wanfang Zhou, Jie Wang and Barry F. Beck GPR and FWD subsurface investigation techniques used to detect voids in variable subgrade soils on I-40 Near Topock Arizona……………………….....128 Nick M. Priznar, Kenneth M. Euge, R.G. Geologic Characterization for Bridge Foundations, Colorado River Bridge, Hoover Dam Bypass Project…………………………………....145 Scott Anderson, David E. Peterson, Robert D. Turton A Risk-Consequence Hazard Rating System for Missouri Highway Rock Cuts…….…175 Norbert H. Maerz, Ahmed Youssef Calibration and Accuracy of Rock Fall Simulation Programs……………….…….…...196 Robert J. Watters and Kurt Katzenstein Rock Slope Failures: A Legal Case History…………………………………………..….208 Joseph A. Fischer and James G. McWhorter Selected Case Histories of Rock Slope Stabilization in New Hampshire……………......218 Dick Lane Rock Slope Failure Case History Yanacachi, Bolivia, S.A……………………………...236 Ted von Rosenvenge Digital Mappping Assistant And Logger: Two Palm Applications For Digital Collection Of Geologic Data Using a PDA And a GPS Receiver And a Geotechnical Borehole Logging Application………………………………………….....259 Randy L. Kath, Deana Sneyd, and Katie Tyrrell A Large Volume Trim Blast for Slope Stabilization, US 97A near Wenatchee, Washington………………………………………………………...…..270 Tom Badger Design of Passive Dowel Systems and Controlled Blasting Measures for Stabilization of Excavated Rock Slopes……………………………….………………….276 Danny J. Van Roosendaal, Nicholas H. Strater and Andrew F. McKown Evaluation of Adverse Bedding Orientation on the Clifford Hollow Bridge Foundations……………………………………………………………………….288 Robert L. Dodson, James M. Sheahan Dispersive Clay Embankment Erosion……………………………………………......…306 Jeff Dean A Case Study of Methods used to Study a Sinkhole on Interstate 40, Pender County, NC……………………………………………………………………......321 Thomas J. Douglas, Brad Worley, and Colin Mellor Statistical Analysis of Unconfined Compressive Strength of Rock Types Found in Oklahoma…………………………………………………………………...….331 Vincent G. Reidenbach, Jim Nevels, Curt Hayes Maryland’s Experience with Large Scale Grouting for Roadway Stabilization in Karst Terrain of I-70………………………………………………….....346 Larry R. Bolt, James L. Stuby, Peter H. Li, David Martin Slope Design for Improvements to New Mexico State Highway 48, near Ruidoso, New Mexico………………………………………………………….…....364 Nancy C. Dessenberger, Robert A. Meyers, Francis E. Harrison Case Histories of Tieback And Soil Nail Walls For Roadways……………………….....385 Harry W. Schnabel Effective Interpretation of Borehole Inclinometer Profiles: What is Really Slope Movement and What is Probably Something Else………………………………….……395 Nancy C. Dessenberger, Francis E. Harrison The following papers were not presented at the Symposium however they were submitted for publication in the Proceedings: Contingent Mechanisms of Stability and Collapse “Old Man of the Mountains” Human Profile, Franconia Notch, New Hampshire*..….…………………………….…405 Brian K. Fowler Stability Analysis of the Rock Ridge Dam, Below Interstate 80/94, Thornton Quarry, Chicago, Illinois*……………………………………...….………………………………422 Yunhua Lu, Terry R. West HIGHWAY GEOLOGY SYMPOSIUM 54th ANNUAL BURLINGTON, VERMONT SEPTEMBER 24th – 26th, 2003 The Vermont Agency of Transportation along with the New Hampshire Department of Transportation, Vermont Geological Survey, University of Vermont Departments of Geology and Civil Engineering, and Norwich University Department of Geology welcomes you to the 54th Annual Highway Geology Symposium. The Local State Steering Committee has strived to put together what we hope is an interesting, educational and enjoyable Symposium. Authors will be presenting some very interesting topics such as geophysical methods, laboratory studies, design considerations and case studies of geo-engineering projects. The field trip will take us across the breadth of Vermont where we will see some interesting rockfall mitigation applications and fascinating Appalachian geology. We will also visit an active granite quarrying facility and an earthen dam repair project. Again, welcome, and enjoy the Symposium amidst the beautiful fall foliage we hope to experience this fall in New England. Thomas D. Eliassen, P.G. Vermont Agency of Transportation Host State Committee Chairman 54th Highway Geology Symposium I HIGHWAY GEOLOGY SYMPOSIUM HISOTRY, ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTION Established to foster a better understanding and closer cooperation between geologists and civil engineers in the highway industry, the Highway Geology Symposium (HGS) was organized and held its first meeting on March 14, 1950, in Richmond, Virginia. Attending the inaugural meeting were representatives from state highway departments (as referred to at the time) from Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, Kentucky, West Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania. In addition, a number of federal agencies and universities were represented. A total of nine technical papers were presented. W.T. Parrott, an engineering geologist with the Virginia Department of Highways, chaired the first meeting. It was Mr. Parrott who originated the Highway Geology Symposium. It was at the 1956 meeting that future HGS leader, A.C. Dodson, began his active role in participating in the Symposium. Mr. Dodson was the Chief Geologist for the North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission, which sponsored the 7th HGS meeting. Since the initial meeting, 52 consecutive annual meetings have been held in 32 different states. Between 1950 and 1962, the meetings were held east of the Mississippi River, with Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, Maryland, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Florida and Tennessee serving as host state. In 1962, the Symposium moved west for the first time to Phoenix, Arizona where the 13th annual HGS meeting was held. Since then it has alternated, for the most part, back and forth for the east to the west. The Annual Symposium has moved to different locations as follows: List of Highway Geology Symposium Meetings No. Year HGS Location No. Year HGS Location 1st 1950 Richmond, VA 2nd 1951 Richmond, VA 3rd 1952 Lexington, VA 4th 1953 Charleston, W VA 5th 1954 Columbus, OH 6th 1955 Baltimore, MD 7th 1956 Raleigh, NC 8th 1957 State College, PA 9th 1958 Charlottesville, VA 10th 1959 Atlanta, GA 11th 1960 Tallahassee, FL 12th 1961 Knoxville, TN 13th 1962 Phoenix, AZ 14th 1963 College Station, TX 15th 1964 Rolla, MO 16th 1965 Lexington, KY 17th 1966 Ames, IA 18th 1967 Lafayette, IN 19th 1968 Morgantown, WV 20th 1969 Urbana, IL 21st 1970 Lawrence, KS 22nd 1971 Norman, OK II 23rd 1972 Old Point Comfort, VA 24th 1973 Sheridan, WY 25th 1974 Raleigh, NC 26th 1975 Coeur d’Alene, ID 27th 1976 Orlando, FL 28th 1977 Rapid City, SD 29th 1978 Annapolis, MD 30th 1979 Portland, OR 31st 1980 Austin, TX 32nd 1981 Gatlinburg, TN 33rd 1982 Vail, CO 34th 1983 Stone Mountain, GA 35th 1984 San Jose, CA 36th 1985 Clarksville, IN 37th 1986 Helena, MT 38th 1987 Pittsburgh, PA 39th 1988 Park City, UT 40th 1989 Birmingham, AL 41st 1990 Albuquerque, NM 42nd 1991 Albany, NY 43rd 1992 Fayetteville, AR 44th 1993 Tampa, FL 45th 1994 Portland, OR 46th 1995 Charleston, WV 47th 1996 Cody, WY 48th 1997 Knoxville, TN 49th 1998 Prescott, AZ 50th 1999 Roanoke, VA 51st 2000 Seattle, WA 52nd 2001 Cumberland,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    469 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us