Plasma concept for generating circularly polarized electromagnetic waves with relativistic amplitude Takayoshi Sano,1, ∗ Yusuke Tatsumi,1 Masayasu Hata,1 and Yasuhiko Sentoku1 1Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan (Dated: Nov 6, 2020; accepted for publication in Physical Review E) Propagation features of circularly polarized (CP) electromagnetic waves in magnetized plasmas are determined by the plasma density and the magnetic field strength. This property can be applied to design a unique plasma photonic device for intense short-pulse lasers. We have demonstrated by numerical simulations that a thin plasma foil under an external magnetic field works as a polarizing plate to separate a linearly polarized laser into two CP waves traveling in the opposite direction. This plasma photonic device has an advantage for generating intense CP waves even with a relativistic amplitude. For various research purposes, intense CP lights are strongly required to create high energy density plasmas in the laboratory. I. INTRODUCTION Our plasma device has a quite simple design, but it can be applied to intense lasers exceeding the relativistic am- Ultra-intense lasers are a unique tool to investigate plitude. extreme plasma conditions, which brings new insight The achievement of quasi-static strong magnetic fields for various research fields such as quantum beam sci- generated in laser experiments shed light on the impor- ence, laser fusion, and laboratory laser astrophysics. The tance of the interactions between laser lights and magne- essence of these applications is to control intense lasers to tized plasmas [17, 18]. Electromagnetic waves propagate produce desired situations of the electromagnetic waves in plasmas as whistler waves when the strength of an and plasmas for each purpose. Plasma photonic device external magnetic field is sufficiently large. The critical emerges as an attractive medium for light manipulation strength Bc for the whistler wave is given by a condi- at high intensities many orders of magnitude beyond the tion that the wave frequency ω0 equals to the electron breaking point of traditional optics [1]. For example, cyclotron frequency, i.e., Bc = meω0/e, where me is the plasma mirror works as an ultrafast optical shutter that electron mass and e is the elementary charge. Since there enhances the pulse contrast [2]. Plasma grating is rou- is no cutoff density for the whistler wave, it can propa- tinely used to deflect the flux of laser energy [3, 4]. Fruit- gate in plasmas at any density [19–21]. This essential ful laser-plasma interactions open up the possibilities for feature stimulates magnetized plasma devices to manage various plasma devices such as pulse amplification [5, 6] the transmission of CP waves [22] and generate CP waves and higher harmonic production [7]. by the Faraday effect [23]. In this paper, we consider a plasma device to convert a We consider a plasma photonic device based on the linearly polarized (LP) laser to circularly polarized (CP) unique characteristics of the whistler wave. The out- lights. CP lasers with relativistic amplitude are thought line of this paper is as follows. The design strategy for to be an ideal means for laser-driven ion acceleration by the generation of CP waves with relativistic amplitude is radiation pressure [8] or collisionless shocks [9] and ef- explained in Sec. II. Our interest is in CP waves trans- fective ion heating by standing whistler waves [10, 11]. mitted after the interaction between a plasma foil and However, it is difficult to increase the intensity of CP an LP laser along an external magnetic field. Numeri- lasers using traditional optics due to the fluence thresh- cal setup and method of two-dimensional (2D) Particle- old with typically a few J/cm2. in-Cell (PIC) simulations are described in Sec. III. In There are several ideas of plasma devices for CP-wave Sec. IV, a systematic survey of the simulations is per- generation utilizing laser-plasma interactions, although formed for functional evaluation of the plasma device as there is a severe limit on the laser intensity. Michel et al. a CP-wave filter. The dependences of the transmittance arXiv:2011.03805v1 [physics.plasm-ph] 7 Nov 2020 [12, 13] propose a novel photonic device as plasma wave- and reflectivity on the magnetic field strength and the plate by the use of optical two-wave mixing. Lehmann laser intensity are elucidated in detail. We examine the and Spatschek [14, 15] demonstrate numerically that effects of the angle between the laser and magnetic field transient plasma photonic crystal can transform LP laser directions in Sec. V. The possibility of the L wave ex- light into circular polarization. It is known that rela- traction is also discussed. Finally, our conclusions are tivistic transparency by anisotropic electron distributions summarized in Sec. VI. drastically alters the laser polarization [16]. Compared with these methods, the key difference of a scheme pro- posed here is in the use of an external magnetic field. II. UNDERLYING CONCEPT We consider a possible way to extract CP waves from ∗ [email protected] an LP laser by controlling laser-plasma interactions un- 2 der a uniform magnetic field. When an external magnetic the field strength as nL = Bext +1, the parameter range field is applied to a plasma target along the direction of of the region (I) is given by laser propagation, electromagnetic waves can travel in e e plasma as either the R wave or the L wave. The R (L) wave is a right-hand (left-hand) CP light with respect to 1 < Bext < ne − 1 . (5) the magnetic field direction. The propagation features of e e these CP waves depend on the electron density ne of the The transmittance of the R and L wave at the vacuum- plasma and the magnetic field strength Bext. Assuming plasma boundary is evaluated by the refractive indexes the laser frequency is ω0, the refractive indexes for the R according to the Fresnel formula [19]. The energy frac- and L waves are given by tion of the transmitted wave relative to the injected en- 2 ergy of each CP wave is derived as T∗ =4N∗/(1 + N∗) , 2 ne NR =1 − , (1) where the subscript ∗ denotes R or L. The reflectivity is 1 − B 2 2 e ext then R∗ = (1 − N∗) /(1 + N∗) . 2 ne NL =1 − e , (2) Figure 1(b) shows the transmittance TR and TL for a 1+ Bext e plasma density with ne = 10. The region (I) corresponds 2 2 that 1 < Bext < 9 for this case, which is highlighted where ne = ωpe/ω0 = ne/nc is thee electron density nor- by light-gray in the figure.e The most ideal situation for malized by the critical density n , and B = ω /ω = c ext ce 0 the R-wavee generation is T = 1 and T = 0. In the B /Be is the ratio of the external magnetic field to the R L ext c region (I), the L wave is perfectly reflected, whereas the critical value B . Here, ω and ω aree the electron c pe ce transmittance for the R wave increases with the magnetic plasma frequency and cyclotron frequency, respectively. field strength. Then the highest transmittance for the We focus on the transmittance of the R and L waves whistler wave will be realized at just below the L-cutoff, at the interface between the vacuum and a plasma tar- that is B ∼ n − 1. This magnetic field strength is get. Since the electromagnetic waves can propagate in ext e the optimized condition by which the plasma foil target plasmas only when N 2 is positive in the linear amplitude will worke as an R-wavee filter most efficiently. The higher limit. Figure 1 indicates the propagation features along transmittance could be realized for much denser targets a magnetic field summarized in the density and magnetic as well, although the optimal strength of the magnetic field diagram (n vs. B ), which is the so-called CMA e ext field becomes larger B ∼ n ≫ 1. (Clemmow-Mullaly-Allis) diagram [24]. Here, the cold ext e e e By contrast, only the L wave is allowed to propagate plasma approximation is adopted, and the ion mass is as- e e sumed to be much higher than the electron mass. The pa- in the region (II) of Fig. 1(a). The parameter range of rameter space is divided into several regions by the cutoff the region (II) can be expressed as conditions for the R and L waves (ωR = ω0 and ωL = ω0) and the cyclotron resonance condition (ωce = ω0), where the cutoff frequency for each wave is written as |ne − 1| < Bext < 1 . (6) 1/2 e e ωR 1 2 = Bext + Bext +4ne , (3) The required strength of the magnetic field is much ω0 2 smaller compared to that of the region (I), which could e e 1/2 ωL 1 2 e be an advantage in terms of practical application. The = −Bext + Bext +4ne . (4) ω0 2 transmittance for the case of ne = 1 is depicted in e e e Fig. 1(c). The region (II) for this case is the range of This diversity in the propagation features is quite differ- e Bext < 1. The transmittance of the L wave increases ent from the normal cutoff condition (ωpe = ω0 or ne = 1) with Bext, whereas the R wave starts to enter the plasma without the external magnetic field. e when B > 1. Then the best performance as an L-wave The forbidden regions for the R and L wave aree dif- e ext filter (T = 0 and T ∼ 1) will be achieved at just be- ferent.