Comments on Paper by M. Arai “Aptian/Albian (Early Cretaceous

Comments on Paper by M. Arai “Aptian/Albian (Early Cretaceous

DOI: 10.1590/2317-4889201620150046A LETTER TO THE EDITOR Comments on paper by M. Arai “Aptian/Albian (Early Cretaceous) paleogeography of the South Atlantic: a paleontological perspective” Discussão do artigo "Aptian/Albian (Early Cretaceous) paleogeography of the South Atlantic: a paleontological perspective” de M. Arai Mario Luis Assine1*, Fernanda Quaglio2, Lucas Veríssimo Warren1, Marcello Guimarães Simões3 The paleogeographic reconstruction of the Brazilian sedi- to Arai’s model, “Tethyan waters could reach the basins of the mentary basins during the Albian-Aptian interval has been a Brazilian continental margin via the seaway then existing in controversial issue for over a decade. The tectonic dynamics, the present-day region of northeastern Brazil”. The proposed as well as the stratigraphy, sedimentology and paleontology paleogeographic reconstruction comprises several elongated, of those basins are closely related to the origin and evolution of shallow, branched gulf-like tongues connecting the Western the South Atlantic Ocean. The indisputable concept of north- Tethys with interior (Parnaíba, Araripe, Recôncavo, Tucano, São ward rifting propagation during the Gondwana break-up is Francisco and Parecis), marginal equatorial (Ceará and Potiguar) primarily based on the sea-floor spreading pattern of magnetic and also marginal eastern Brazilian basins (Almada, Espírito stripes, and several geodynamic reconstructions have been Santo, Campos and Santos) (see Arai 2014, Fig. 2, p. 342). proposed to explain plate rotation and accommodation of Attempts to reconstruct the Late Aptian to Early Albian the associated intracontinental deformation (e.g. Le Pichon South Atlantic Ocean paleogeography are critical to under- & Hayes 1971, Rabinowitz & LaBrecque 1979, Eagles 2007, stand the paleoenvironmental changes tied to the Gondwana Torsvik et al. 2009, Moulin et al. 2010). The opening direc- break-up. This issue is tricky, and a rich discussion on pos- tion of the South Atlantic ocean is believed to have followed sible scenarios of marine ingression in the NE Brazilian the northward rifting, and formerly evoked scenarios recon- basins is indeed very welcome. By considering this, we structed the marine ingression from the north towards the inte- suggest that several data on distinct areas of Geology (i.e., rior NE Brazil solely after the break-up reached the equatorial sedimentology, structural geology, stratigraphy and pale- Brazilian margin in the Cenomanian (Dingle 1999) or even ontology) should not be overlooked when aiming a more earlier during the Albian (Dias-Brito 2000, Azevedo 2004). precise paleogeographic scenario. Our purpose in this com- Based on paleontological data, Arai (2014) recently pro- ment is to take part of this discussion and highlight that a posed a distinct scenario in which the earliest marine ingression multidisciplinary approach must be addressed in order to in the Brazilian marginal basin would have taken place during confirm or refute the paleogeographic model proposed by the late Aptian “under the domain of waters coming from Arai (2014). In our opinion, an integrated paleogeographic north through the Tethys Sea (Central Atlantic)”. According reconstruction must be based on 1Institute of Geosciences and Exact Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista – Unesp, Rio Claro (SP), Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2Institute of Geosciences and Exact Sciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista – Unesp, Rio Claro (SP), Brazil, (Post-Doc Researcher FAPESP 2014/ 27337-8). E-mail: [email protected] 3Institute of Biosciences, Department of Zoology, Universidade Estadual Paulista – Unesp, Botucatu (SP), Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] *Corresponding author. Manuscript ID: 2015046A. 3 Brazilian Journal of Geology, 46(1): 3-7, March 2016 Comments on paper by Arai (2014) 1. the number of Tethyan versus austral fossil representati- The proposed reconstruction includes a seaway branch con- ves and their accurate stratigraphic occurrence, necting the São Francisco basin and the Western Tethys to the 2. the precise timing of the first marine ingression in the north. This assumption is based on the presence of radiolarians continent interior, and sponge spicules in thin chert levels interbedded in aeolian 3. the basin-filling pattern and stratigraphic architecture sandstones of the Três Barras Formation (Sgarbi 2000), Areado of the depositional sequences, Group (Kattah 1991, Pessagno & Dias-Brito 1996, Dias-Brito 4. paleocurrents and other paleogeographic indicators, and et al. 1999). This succession would represent a single, quite 5. the continental paleotopography and paleodrainage. unusual occurrence of a deep marine deposit in a thick (~200 m) continental sedimentary succession. In fact, Sgarbi (2000) stated: The model proposed by Arai (2014) is mainly based on dino- “how marine fossils are present in a continental sequence in cen- cyst fossils (Arai 1999, 2011), as well as other micro and macrofossil tral Brazil? It is a surprising geologic puzzle, with many and large evidences (forams, radiolarians, molluscs, echinoids, crustaceans, paleogeographic implications, with interest for the geology of the fishes and pleurodiran turtles) from literature. A very important Gondwana and the opening of the South Atlantic Ocean”. Nearly point is that several of these macrofossils were not formally described 20 years after the first report of this occurrence, this conundrum or even properly illustrated in available scientific venues. In fact, persists, as no transitional layers that would potentially represent some of them (especially molluscs) were firstly identified more than marine transgressive deposits over the continental interior is pre- three decades ago and, thus, require a profound systematic revision. served between the radiolarian-rich chert and aeolian sandstones. Nevertheless, as pointed out by Arai (2014), the Late Aptian to Besides this controversial radiolarite occurrence, the proposed Early Albian marine ingression in the Araripe Basin is long-estab- seaway is also not feasible taking into account that the radio- lished (Beurlen 1962, Beurlen 1971a, Beurlen 1971b, Mabesoone larians are associated with Pacific austral forms, typically found & Tinoco 1973, Coimbra et al. 2002), as indicated by the pres- southerly to latitude 22°S (Dias-Brito et al. 1999). ence of echinoids (Beurlen 1966, Manso & Hessel 2012), as well The narrow seaway depicted in the paleogeographic as microfossils, such as dinoflagellates (Arai & Coimbra 1990, model that connects the northwestern coast of the South Coimbra et al. 2002). On the other hand, the Tethyan affinity America and the Parnaíba and São Francisco Basins through is undoubtedly assumed by the author based on the occurrence the Parecis Basin seems another farfetched assumption. of members of the Subtilisphaera ecozone recorded in the São The late Early Cretaceous deposits of the Parecis Basin are Luís, Ceará, Parnaíba and Araripe basins. Apart of Subtilisphaerea, exclusively continental (Bahia 2006), ruling out a possible most of fossils mentioned in Arai’s contribution typify marine marine connection through the Parecis Basin. occurrences only, meaning that they are not necessarily of exclu- The Araripe Basin is a critical area for the epicontinental sive Tethyan affinity. The total dominance of distinct species of paleogeographic seaway-model proposed by Arai (2014), because Subtilisphaera is more abundantly recorded and with higher the basin is located in the most probable central route for the species richness in Tethyan-related deposits. For this reason, the marine ingression of the Tethyan waters to the eastern-marginal genus is a paleobiogeographic proxy for Aptian deposits in the Brazilian basins placed north of the Rio Grande Rise and the model. Indeed, a northern influence in the fauna as early as in Walvis Ridge. According to the hypothetical paleogeographic the Aptian seems to us quite plausible. The main issue regard- scenario proposed by Arai (2014), the seawaters advanced ing the overall subject is the direction of the marine ingression in towards the continental interior in a complete opposite direc- all of those basins, and the presence of fossils of Tethyan affinity tion of the contemporaneous flowing rivers of the Araripe and solely is not reliable to confirm the distribution pattern of the Tucano basins. Hundreds of paleocurrent data measured from hypothesized seaway. Other data are needed in order to under- distinct outcrops in the Aptian fluvial deposits of the Barbalha stand how the marine connections had evolved. Formation, Araripe Basin (Assine 1994, Chagas et al. 2007, The paleogeographic map depicted in the proposed model Scherer et al. 2015), and in the Marizal Formation, Tucano Basin uses landmass distributions by Scotese (2001) and previous (Rolim & Mabesoone 1982, Figueiredo et al. 2015), indicate a reconstructions by Arai (2007, 2011). The branched pattern of consistent paleoflow towards south and southeast. Considering the seaway is based on modern contours of the Araripe, Jatobá, that the sea transgressions are constrained by the continental Tucano, Recôncavo, Almada, Potiguar, São Francisco and São drainage, the paleocurrents of Aptian fluvial deposits strongly Luís basins. One should note that the modern limits of those suggest that the marine transgression advanced towards the con- basins do not represent their original paleogeographic configu- tinent throughout fluvial valleys, from the Recôncavo-Tucano rations,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us