Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment

Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment

Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment May 2017 Cat. No.: En14-317/2018E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-24940-7 Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: • Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; • Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and • Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the author. For more information, please contact Environment and Climate Change Canada’s Inquiry Centre at 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only) or 819-997-2800 or email to [email protected]. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change, 2016. Aussi disponible en français Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment Page 2 of 98 Summary The New Substances Notification Regulations (Organisms) (the regulations) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA) are organized according to organism type (micro- organisms and organisms other than micro-organisms) and by activity. The Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment (MIFRA) provides guidance on the required information for identifying micro-organisms. This document is intended for those who deal with the technical aspects of information elements or information requirements of the regulations that pertain to identification of a notified micro-organism. It is intended to help notifiers with the choice of methodology and the analysis of scientific data required for adequate microbial identification. The document is technical in nature and relies heavily on concepts of microbiology, microbial taxonomy and methods of microbial identification. Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment Page 3 of 98 Table of contents Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Who should use the MIFRA? ............................................................................................. 6 2. The importance of microbial identification for the purpose of risk assessment ........... 7 3. Acceptable taxonomic level of identification ................................................................... 7 4. General approach to microbial identification .................................................................. 9 Polyphasic tiered approach for identification of a micro-organism ........................ 10 Recognized methods for identification of a micro-organism ................................... 16 5. Case studies for identification of different micro-organisms ........................................ 16 6. Updates to the MIFRA ..................................................................................................... 18 Appendices .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Appendix A – Glossary .......................................................................................................... 19 Terms ........................................................................................................................... 19 Appendix B – Recognized methods for identification of micro-organisms ....................... 21 Phenotypic methods ................................................................................................... 21 Genotypic methods .................................................................................................... 28 Other methods useful for microbial identification ................................................... 36 Appendix C – Template ........................................................................................................ 39 Appendix D – Microbial identification: Case studies .......................................................... 40 Case study Arcobacter sp. .......................................................................................... 40 Case study Aspergillus niger ....................................................................................... 45 Case study Aurantiochytrium limacinum ................................................................... 48 Case study Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ....................................................................... 51 Case study Candida tropicalis..................................................................................... 56 Case study Deinococcus proteolyticus ....................................................................... 58 Case study Influenza virus .......................................................................................... 61 Case study Komagataella phaffii................................................................................ 63 Case study Listeria monocytogenes ........................................................................... 65 Case study Rhodococcus aetherivorans ..................................................................... 70 Case study Saccharomyces cerevisiae ....................................................................... 77 Case study Shewanella indica..................................................................................... 81 Case study Trichoderma reesei .................................................................................. 85 Appendix E – References ...................................................................................................... 88 Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment Page 4 of 98 Introduction The New Substances Notification Regulations (Organisms) (the regulations) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA) are organized according to organism type (micro- organisms and organisms other than micro-organisms) and activity. A common information element of the micro-organism schedules is information substantiating the identification of the notified micro-organism1. The Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment (MIFRA) provides guidance on this information element. The MIFRA aims to set a common frame of reference to be used in microbial identification for the purposes of risk assessment related to a New Substance Notification (NSN). This frame of reference should help in the choice of methodology and the analysis of data required for adequate microbial identification. It describes specific methodology used in microbial identification and incorporates 13 case studies demonstrating the application of this framework, as well as a suggested template for their presentation. Methods for identifying and characterizing micro-organisms are constantly evolving and new methods with improved specificity and reliability are continuously being developed; therefore, the New Substances Program (NSP) will update this document periodically and as required. Genetic modifications made to a notified micro-organism are not within the scope of this document as these are addressed under specific information elements in the regulations. The MIFRA should be used in conjunction with the Guidance for the Notification and Testing of New Substances: Organisms which contains guidance on completing all other information elements of the regulations. In addition, the scope of this document does not extend to synthetic micro- organisms that have been constructed with significant genomic content from potentially unrelated species (for example, the experimental micro-organism Mycoplasma laboratorium). Such artificial micro-organisms may not have relevant taxonomic relationships with natural species, and are to be considered a special case in the context of identification for a use that falls under the scope of CEPA. A pre-notification consultation (PNC) should be requested with the NSP to discuss the notification of a synthetic micro-organism. 1 Information in respect of the micro-organism: its identification and the information substantiating its identification (paragraph 1(a) of Schedules 1, 2, 3, 4 of the regulations (http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/regulations/SOR-2005- 248/index.html) Microbial Identification Framework for Risk Assessment Page 5 of 98 Pre-Notification Consultation (PNC) A PNC is an option for notifiers who wish to consult with the NSP during the planning or preparation of their NSN package to discuss any questions or concerns they have about the required prescribed information. To request a PNC, please contact the NSP: Substances Management Information Line Telephone: 1-800-567-1999 (Toll Free in Canada) or 1-819-938-3232 (Outside of Canada) Facsimile: 1-819-938-5212 E-mail: [email protected] This document has been prepared to assist notifiers responsible for complying with the New Substances Notification Regulations (Organisms) of CEPA. Any obligations under these regulations are independent of any obligations that notifiers may have under

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    98 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us