Philosophy 102 - Practical Logic http://www.westminster.edu/staff/brennie/phi102bsr.htm PRACTICAL LOGIC (Currently under construction--this webpage is NOT complete or accurate. Students should not rely on it. Bryan Rennie GENERAL NOTES ON THE CLASS EXPLANATION OF GRADES AND POINTS, ETC. SAMPLE QUIZZES(WARNING: As of August 2016 these quizzes have NOT been properly adapted to the Fall course) SCHEDULE OF CLASSES THE SIX RULES OF SYLLOGISMS (and corresponding fallacies) SYMBOLS USED IN BASIC LOGIC PHI 102 online exercises for The Art Of Reasoning GENERAL NOTES ON THIS CLASS THE SET TEXTS TAR = The Art Of Reasoning, by David Kelley (4th edition). ISBN: 978-0-393-93078-8 E-text: ISBN: 978-0-393-52157-3 1 of 23 8/23/16, 10:21 AM Philosophy 102 - Practical Logic http://www.westminster.edu/staff/brennie/phi102bsr.htm COURSE OBJECTIVES This course is an introduction to the basics of logic as an academic discipline. We will consider what logic is. It is the study of the distinction between valid and invalid reasoning. Having established our working attitude to logic we will investigate the basic terms, forms, types, and style of argument and the uses of language in argument. To that end the basic vocabulary of logic and argument must be learned. Our most extensive analysis will be of deductive logic, that is to say, arguments which produce logically necessary conclusions once their premises are accepted. The standard forms of such arguments will be analyzed, and their accompanying fallacies noted. The symbol systems used to express and analyze these forms will be practiced. The overall objective of this is two-fold: first, it will inform students of the precise and formal nature of logical proof (and its relative rarity); second, exposure to and practice with arguments and their identification as valid or invalid should greatly sharpen the students' natural skill at validating arguments and constructing their own valid arguments. This last is in many ways the final objective of this course. Our final detailed consideration will be of informal fallacies, those common errors which render arguments invalid in common language argument. Once again the difficulties of irrefutable argument and final proof will be encountered. So the course objectives can be stated to be: 1. To learn what an argument is. What components does it contain, what assumptions does it make? 2. To learn what makes a good argument. Why does a given conclusion follow from certain assumptions? 3. To learn what makes a bad argument. Why are certain conclusions not entailed by certain propositions? 2 of 23 8/23/16, 10:21 AM Philosophy 102 - Practical Logic http://www.westminster.edu/staff/brennie/phi102bsr.htm COURSE REQUIREMENTS Attendance Since discussion is required to ensure that each point is fully understood and absorbed attendance is crucial. Missed classes will be penalized. Learning good logic skills is like learning both language and manual skill--they require practice, both physical and mental. To that end all students will be required to answer questions, solve problems, and do exercises from the textbook in class. Note that these exercises are not graded. All you need to do is to demonstrate to the instructor and to the class that you have made an effort to complete them. It is your responsibility to raise questions about points which you have not understood. This is your opportunity to seek clarification on difficult passages. You are NOT automatically expected to fully understand everything you read. IF STUDENTS DO NOT MAKE AN EFFORT TO PERFORM THESE EXERCISES POINTS WILL BE SUBTRACTED FROM THEIR TOTAL. Readings The assigned reading and schedule of classes is a guideline designed to cover the entire textbook in the span of the semester. Readings and assignments may be changed according to student performance. Homework There will be a certain amount of reading homework after most classes to ensure a constant and ongoing effort to master each section before moving on to the next. This homework will not be handed in and will not be graded as such. It is for your own good rather than for the grading process. However, questions will be asked about the homework at the start of each class, and if it is apparent that you have not done it points will be subtracted. Time will be allowed in class to attempt the exercises but they must be studied beforehand as 3 of 23 8/23/16, 10:21 AM Philosophy 102 - Practical Logic http://www.westminster.edu/staff/brennie/phi102bsr.htm homework. GRADING Grading will be done on a points system up to a maximum of 400 total possible points: 1. Quizzes (7 @ 30 points) These quizzes are the most important element of the course and are meant to ensure steady effort and ongoing understanding. WARNING: Failure to score a passing grade on any quiz will result in the loss of all point for that quiz. 210 points = c.52%. 2. Computer exercises. Although these exercises will not be graded for performance 100 points will be given for simply completing them. Up to one quarter of your total grade points can be lost by not doing the required exercises. 100 points = 25% 3. Final examination This will review the whole course so the start is not forgotten at the end. WARNING: Failure to pass the final is failure to pass the course. 90 points = c.23% The written quizzes will take a form similar (but not identical) to these sample quizzes. (WARNING: As of August 2016 these quizzes have not been adapted to the new Fall course.) SAMPLE QUIZ QUESTIONS These quizzes are NOT yet accurate or in the right order. 4 of 23 8/23/16, 10:21 AM Philosophy 102 - Practical Logic http://www.westminster.edu/staff/brennie/phi102bsr.htm Quiz #1 | Quiz #2 | Quiz #3 | Quiz #4 | Quiz #5 | Quiz #6 | Quiz #7 | SAMPLE QUIZ #1 (This quiz will be on TAR Chapters One through Three) 1. Explain the difference between deduction and induction. 2. Define "argument." 3. What is "inference?" 4. In the following argument mark the premises with "p," and the conclusion with a "c." Dave's car is dangerous. It has bald tires and bad brakes and bald tires and bad brakes are dangerous. 5. Is the preceding argument valid? 6. Indicate which of the following sentences (1-3) are correctly described by the following terms (a-c). 1) If I understood all this I'd be a genius. 2) What am I, a genius? 3) I'm a genius a) rhetorical question, b) hypothetical statement, c) proposition 7. Sort the following terms into conclusion indicators and premise indicators: therefore . ., for the reason that . ., as a result . ., which implies that . ., . may be deduced from, inasmuch as . ., hence, accordingly, proves that . ., for . ., so . ., I conclude that . ., because . ., since . ., follows from . 8. Which of the given passages are arguments, which are explanations? (For examples see TAR 1.4) SAMPLE QUIZ #2 (This quiz will be on TAR Chapters Four and Five) 1. Paraphrase the following argument. 5 of 23 8/23/16, 10:21 AM Philosophy 102 - Practical Logic http://www.westminster.edu/staff/brennie/phi102bsr.htm 2. Diagram the following argument. 3. Solve the following problem. 4. What are the five functions of language? 5. What functions of language do the given examples serve? (Egs. TAR pp. 66 - 71). 6. Identify the kinds of agreement or disagreement most probably exhibited by the following paired passages. 7. Exchange the expressive or ceremonial terms in the given paragraph with emotively neutral language. Be careful not to lose any informative significance. 8. Identify the disagreements of belief and the disagreements of attitude in the given examples. (Egs. TAR pp. 76 - 79) SAMPLE QUIZ #3 (This quiz will be on TAR Chapters Six and Seven) 1. Arrange the following groups of terms in order of increasing intension. (Egs. TAR 89) 2. Define the following terms by example/by genus and difference. (Egs. TAR 91. 98). 3. Name the form of the given propositions. Give both the name (eg. universal affirmative) and letter (eg. "A") identification. 4. Identify the subject and predicate terms in the following propositions. Are they distributed or undistributed. (egs.) Some television presenters are not responsible citizens. No poets are aggressive. The following material will be covered in class immediately before the quiz. 5. Draw the traditional/Aristotelian square of oppositions. 6. What immediate inferences can be made from the following propositions? (Assuming these propositions to be true.) (egs.) 6 of 23 8/23/16, 10:21 AM Philosophy 102 - Practical Logic http://www.westminster.edu/staff/brennie/phi102bsr.htm All successful business executives are intelligent people. No college professors are entertaining lecturers. 7. Define the following immediate inferences (egs.): conversion obversion contraposition 8. Given a certain proposition determine whether following propositions are its converse/obverse/contrapositive/subalternate. If the first given proposition is true, are the following propositions true? That is to say, are these valid immediate inferences? 9. Given a sequence of immediate inferences which are valid by Aristotelian logic, identify where an existential fallacy occurs. SAMPLE QUIZ #4 (TAR Chapters Eight and Nine) 1. Express the given propositions as equations (eg. SP = 0, etc.) and as Venn diagrams for propositions. 2. Rewrite the given arguments in standard form, indicating their mood and figure. No motorcycles are safe forms of transport, so, since some police vehicles are motorcycles, some safe forms of transport are not police vehicles. All proteins are organic compounds, whence all enzymes are proteins, as all enzymes are organic compounds. [The four figures are: 1st - (M-P\S-M), 2nd - (P-M |S-M), 3rd - (M-P| M-S), 4th - (P-M/M-S).