CASE STUDY 2-1 IMPLEMENTING ADAPTATION MEASURES Community-based Adaptation to Climate Change through Coastal Aff orestation in Bangladesh Project site in August, 2016. Photo courtesy of ICCCAD Lessons Learned and Policy Recommendations ● Circumstances of individual participants needs to be taken into account in community-based adapta- tion (CbA) development and management. ● Appropriate and sedulous capacity-building gives communities individual confi dence and enhanced resilience. ● Communication among stakeholders and dissemination of information about project achievements are eff ective for enhancing CbA activities in the long term. Outline ● Background climate hazards is determined by their exposure, and is in- Climate change poses signifi cant risks for Bangladesh. Given creased by environmental degradation and low adaptation its geographical location, the coastal region of Bangladesh capacity. is especially vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, Th e Forest-Fish-Fruit (Triple F) model is an integral part of including cyclones, tidal surges, tidal fl ooding, land erosion, the CBACC-CF project, which is designed to make rational and sea-level rise. It is expected that climate change will use of coastal land to produce forestry, fruit, and fi sh resourc- increase the frequency and intensity of climatic disasters in es in order to diversify livelihoods, generate income and in- the coming years, putting the lives and livelihoods of coastal crease local resilience to climate change.[1] A similar concept communities at greater risk. Th e livelihoods of people living had been established in 2004 in a “Group based Resource in coastal areas depend heavily on four climate-sensitive Generation” model by Dr. Paramesh Nandy who worked for sectors: agriculture, forestry, fi sheries, and livestock. Th e Bangladesh Forest Research Institute (BFRI) at the time. He impacts of climate change on these sectors will reduce the made a proposal of the Triple-F model in collaboration with adaptive capacity of coastal communities. In Bangladesh, the Government of Bangladesh aft er joining UNDP. coastal aff orestation is considered to increase the resilience and reduce the vulnerability of protective ecosystems and ● Geographical characteristics adjacent coastal communities. Th e government promotes Th e project sites, the most aff ected areas of the four coastal coastal aff orestation to contribute to global mitigation in the districts in Bangladesh, were chosen through extensive decades ahead. stakeholder consultations with government agencies and com- munity members. Th e areas are as follows (See Figure 2-1-1): Th e Community-based Adaptation to Climate Change Borguna Sadar Upazila (“Upazila” means sub-district) in through Coastal Aff orestation in Bangladesh (CBACC-CF) Borguna District; Char fashion Upazila in Bhola District; project was undertaken based on the National Adaptation Hatia Upazila in Noakhali District; Anwara Upazila in Plan of Action of Bangladesh. It is built on the conceptual Chittagong District. framework that the vulnerability of coastal populations to Th e districts share the following features: Sub-goals Th e livelihoods of coastal communities are highly depen- Improve local and national awareness and understanding dent on climate-sensitive sectors including agriculture, of the benefi ts of preparedness for climate change risks. forestry, and fi sheries, as well as livestock. Most of the Increase the resilience of natural, social, and economic coastal people, however, depend on single fi shing activ- systems at a community level. ities and have very limited skills and knowledge of integrated ●Institutional arrangements[1] farming. Capacity building is Th e project was mainly funded by the Least Developed therefore needed to raise their Country Fund (LDCF), the United Nations Development resilience to climate risks. Noakhali Program (UNDP), Swiss Agency for Development and Coop- Chittagong Major environmental issues in eration (SDC), and Embassy of the Netherlands (EKN). It Barguna the four project sites are cyclones, is executed by the Government of Bangladesh’s Ministry of Environment and Forest (MoEF). Bhola fl oods, soil and river erosion, salinization, and siltation.[2] Th e Project Board includes Department of Fisheries Figure 2-1-1 Locations of the project sites and other departments/ministries such as Agriculture, Fisheries, Livestock, Bangladesh Forest Research Institute, and Bangladesh Water Development Board and Ministry of ● Objectives [1][3] Overall goal Land. UNDP, Th e International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), NGOs, and other local implementers, Th e goal of the project is to promote climate-resilient de- were involved in the project as well. (See Figure 2-1-2) velopment in the coastal areas of Bangladesh by reducing the vulnerability of these areas. Forest-Fruit-Fish model Community Based Adaptation to Climate Change through Coastal Afforestation Local implementer Government LFCF : Least Developed Country Fund UNDP : United Nations Development Program FD Finance IUCN SDC : Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation LFCF DAE EKN : Embassy of the Kingdom of the CNRS Netherlands BFRI GoB : Government of the People's Republic UNDP MoFL of Bangladesh PMID Targeted area lUCN : International Union for the Conservation of Nature Barguna Bhola BWDB SDC CNRS : Center for Natural Resource studies BCAS Noakhali Chittagong MoL PMID : Participatory Management Initiative for Development EKN BCAS : Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies GoB FD : Department of Fisheries Technical & Administrative Support Executing Agency DAE : Department of Agricultural Extension BFRI : Bangladesh Forest Research Institute UNDP MoEF MoFL : Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock BWDB : Bangladesh Water Development Board MoL : Ministry of Land MoEF : Ministry of Environment and Forest Figure 2-1-2 Institutional Arrangements Eff ectiveness of the Forest-Fish-Fruit (Triple F) Model[1][3] The Triple F Model, a key component of the CBACC-CF project, 3) Increased protection of communities from the impacts of uses barren coastal land to produce forest, fruit, and fi sh re- climate change (help secure food and income security (pro- sources, in order to diversify livelihoods and enhance commu- vides two to threefold added income)) nity resilience to climate change. Benefi ts of this model include: 4) Empowered landless communities to withstand the impacts 1) Eff ective protection and preservation of ecosystems of climate change by providing them with land ownership 2) Innovative and rational use of land (of great importance, es- rights over government land pecially for a highly land scarce country such as Bangladesh) ● Activities Vulnerability assessment with local communities[2] doubtful about the potential benefi ts of the project. Participatory rural appraisals (PRAs) and vulnerability To inform local people and benefi ciaries about the im- assessments were conducted to recognize and assess local pacts of climate change on their communities, currently adaptation needs. Prior to PRAs and vulnerability assess- available adaptation measures for coastal aff orestation, ments, local people were unaware of the impacts of climate existing livelihood options related to agriculture, fi sheries, change on their communities due to the government’s and forestry, and local preparedness systems for extreme active promotion of aff orestation, and lack of interest and events were documented with the active participation of motivation to participate in the program. Th ey were also local communities. CASE STUDY 2-1 Community-based Adaptation to Climate Change through Coastal Aff orestation in Bangladesh Capacity-building of local and government stakeholders Provide benefi ciaries with increased income from Triple-F model Th e capacity of government staff was strengthened Sales and surplus vegetables from the Triple-F model through the development and implementation of several increased family incomes by about BDT. 20,000/year. communication materials, three training modules, and Short- to mid-term interventions through the introduc- eight technical training modules. Some district offi cials tion of duck cum fi sh technology bring additional income have visited the project sites.[4] from selling fi sh and eggs. Besides, it is estimated that quick-growing and early yielding fruit varieties and forest Th e capacities of local communities were also strength- trees, which will provide long-term timber and mid-term ened. Training in mangrove nursery production and fuel wood from branch pruning, and food products bring plantation, aquaculture, and livestock livelihoods were further income.[5] provided to about 12,000 people. In addition, more than 1,000 people received instruction on improved agricul- In total, the benefi ciaries have increased their incomes tural technologies. more than 330% compared to their baseline income.[5] A Local CoManagement Committee (CMC) was founded Monitoring and Evaluation (M & E) at each project site. CMC facilitates implementation of project activities, manages confl ict resolution, and pro- Th e project was monitored through various means, in- vides policy and legal support as needed by the project, cluding meetings, workshops, and site visits. thus serving as the local executing council of the project. Th e terminal evaluation assessed from project formula- Th e committee includes representatives of all implement- tion, project implementation, including monitoring and ing departments, elected local Union Parishad