Granuloma Annulare; Morphea; Borrelia Burgdor Borrelia Or Chlamydiales with Morpheaisunlikely

Granuloma Annulare; Morphea; Borrelia Burgdor Borrelia Or Chlamydiales with Morpheaisunlikely

355 CLINICAL REPORT Granuloma Annulare and Morphea: Correlation with Borrelia DV burgdorferi Infections and Chlamydia-related Bacteria Lauri TOLKKI1#, Kati HOKYNAR2#, Seppo MERI3, Jaana PANELIUS1, Mirja PUOLAKKAINEN2 and Annamari RANKI1 cta 1Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereal Diseases, University of Helsinki and Center of Inflammation, Helsinki University 2 3 A Central Hospital, Department of Virology, and Department of Bacteriology and Immunology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland #These authors contributed equally to this paper. A retrospective study of 109 skin biopsies with gra- Chlamydia-related bacteria (16–19). They share the nuloma annulare (GA) or morphea histology from pa- characteristic features of the order Chlamydiales: strict tients with suspected tick bite was performed. Biop- intracellular lifestyle, biphasic developmental cycle sies were tested for cutaneous Borrelia burgdorferi and a large core-set of genes. The traditional members DNA using PCR. The same biopsies were analysed for of the order are the established human pathogens Chla- tick-borne novel agents, Chlamydia-related bacteria enereologica mydia trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae (genus (members of the Chlamydiales order), using a PCR- V Chlamydia, family Chlamydiaceae). During the last 20 based method. Borrelia DNA was detected in 7/73 (9.6%) biopsies with GA and in 1/36 (2.8 %) biopsies years, an increasing number of novel chlamydial species with morphea, while Chlamydiales DNA was found in have been described and, currently, 8 additional families 53/73 (72.6%) biopsies with GA and 25/34 (73.4%) are recognized as belonging to the Chlamydiales order. ermato- biopsies with morphea. All Borrelia DNA-positive GA These new families: Parachlamydiaceae, Waddliaceae, D samples were also positive for Chlamydiales DNA. The Simkaniaceae, Rhabdochlamydiaceae, Criblamydia- Chlamydiales sequences detected in GA were hetero- ceae, Piscichlamydiaceae, Clavichlamydiaceae and cta geneous and contained Waddliaceae and Rhabdochla- Parilichlamydiaceae are collectively called Chlamydia- A mydiaceae bacteria, which are also present in Ixodes related bacteria. They were originally detected in various ricinus ticks, while the Chlamydiales sequences detec- types of environmental samples (e.g. soil and water ted in morphea closely resembled those found in heal- from various sources), but subsequently also in animals, thy skin. In conclusion, tick-mediated infections can including arthropods, and humans. Many of them have trigger GA in some cases, while correlation of either pathogenic potential (20, 21), and their reservoirs, vectors Borrelia or Chlamydiales with morphea is unlikely. DV and transmission routes have been widely investigated, Key words: granuloma annulare; morphea; Borrelia burgdor- but have mainly remained obscure. cta feri; chlamydia-related bacteria. In this study, 109 patient skin biopsies with histologi- A Accepted Oct 31, 2017; Epub ahead of print Nov 7, 2017 cally confirmed GA and localized scleroderma (morphea) were analysed retrospectively. The samples had been stu- Acta Derm Venereol 2018; 98: 355–360. died for the presence of B. burgdorferi, either because of Corr: Lauri Tolkki, Center of Inflammation, Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereal Diseases, Helsinki University Central Hospital, a clinical suspicion of borreliosis or because of abundant PO Box 160, FIN-00029 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: [email protected] plasma cells in the biopsy. In order to determine whether certain types of Chlamydia-related bacteria could play a ranuloma annulare (GA) and morphea (localized role in the pathogenesis of these conditions, the occur- Gscleroderma) are skin reactions with unknown rence and type(s) of Chlamydiales in the biopsies was aetiology (1–5). One of the possible causative agents is examined, and the results compared with our previously Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, a spirochete transmitted published data on healthy skin and ticks (17). We recently to humans via tick bites. Although the causal connections reported the occurrence of Chlamydiales in up to 40% of between B. burgdorferi and GA and morphea have been Finnish ticks and, furthermore, in human skin biopsies. explored in several studies using various methods, inclu- Chlamydiales DNA was found in human skin samples, ding indirect serological methods and direct detection by with a prevalence of 49% in healthy skin (19/39, 49%) PCR, there is no firm evidence of a causative role (6–11). and 85% in skin samples from subjects positive for B. In addition to B. burgdorferi sensu lato, ticks are burgdorferii PCR. This suggests that ticks could indeed known to serve as vectors for a number of other animal serve as vectors for transmission of Chlamydia-related and human pathogens, such as Babesia microti, which bacteria. causes babesiosis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, which causes human granulocytic anaplasmosis, species of the MATERIALS AND METHODS spotted fever group of Rickettsiae, and Flavivirus, which causes tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) (12–15). Patients dvances in dermatology and venereology Recently, Ixodes ricinus ticks have also been shown Data for all patients whose skin biopsies had a histology of GA A to carry another group of potential human pathogens, or morphea and were submitted to B. burgdorferi DNA analysis This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license. www.medicaljournals.se/acta doi: 10.2340/00015555-2831 Journal Compilation © 2018 Acta Dermato-Venereologica. Acta Derm Venereol 2018; 98: 355–360 356 L. Tolkki et al. at the Department of Dermatology, Helsinki University Central Table I. Characteristics of 109 patients with granuloma annulare Hospital from 2010 to 2015 were reviewed. The samples were (GA) or morphea studied for the presence of B. burgdorferi due to clinical suspicion GA Morphea of borreliosis, history of tick bites, or the dermatopathologist’s Patients, n 73 36 DV recommendation based on histological features. The study in- Male, n (%) 8 (11) 6 (17) cluded 109 skin biopsies from 73 patients with GA and 36 with Female, n (%) 65 (89) 30 (83) cta morphea. Clinical and serological data were retrieved from patient Age, years, mean (range) 59 (7–85) 55 (8–84) files retrospectively. Tick-bite recalled 17 (23) 7 (19) A Follow-up time, months, mean (range) 9 (0–55) 18 (0–55) Localized disease, n (%) 38 (52) 20 (56) Histopathology Generalized disease, n (%) 35 (48) 16 (44) Histopathological analysis was performed as routine investiga- tion in the Laboratory of Dermatopathology, Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital by an experienced and 100 ng template DNA in a total reaction volume of 20 µl. PCR dermatopathologist. Histological slides were available for re- cycling (60 cycles of 95°C 15 s, 60°C 1 min) was performed with examination by one of the authors (LT) in 71 cases of GA and 34 a LightCycler instrument (Roche). cases of morphea. GA has 2 predominant histological variants, palisading and Borrelia antibodies enereologica interstitial, both of which are characterized by mucin and dermal inflammation (2). The histopathology of morphea is indistin- Anti-borrelia IgG and IgM antibodies were determined by 2 V guishable from the skin lesion of systemic sclerosis (3). The immunoassays. If the screening test (Genzyme Virotech GmbH, histopathological findings in the samples of our patients with Russelsheim, Germany) was positive, a confirmatory chemilu- ® GA and morphea were classic and identical to the description in minescence immunoassay (Liaison ) was performed as a routine standard textbooks. procedure (Diasorin, Saluggia, Italy) by HUSLAB (23). The results ermato- were interpreted as described earlier (22). D Detection of B. burgdorferi in skin biopsies by PCR Detection of Chlamydia-related bacteria in skin biopsies by PCR B. burgdorferi sensu lato DNA detection was performed as a part cta and sequencing of amplicons of routine diagnostics by PCR amplification and hybridization with A 16S rRNA- and OspA-specific primers and probes, as described Chlamydiales DNA was detected with a pan-Chlamydiales earlier (6, 22). Real-time PCR with LightCycler® (Roche, Basel, real-time TaqMan-PCR method, as described earlier (17, 24). Switzerland) was also performed. Briefly, PCR reactions contai- Extreme precautions were taken to avoid cross-contamination, ned 10 µl 2×MasterMix of the DyNAmo Flash Probe qPCR Kit and no-template (water) controls were included in each PCR (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 1 µl 10 µM the run. The resulting DNA amplicons (approximately 200 bp of corresponding forward and reverse primers, 0.5 µl 10 µM probe, the 16S rRNA gene region) were purified by Illustra ExoProStar DV cta A Fig. 1. Clinical pictures of granuloma annulare (GA) and morphea skin lesions. (A) Localized GA typically presents with an annular lesion on the dvances in dermatology and venereology dorsum of hand. (B) Generalized GA consisting of papules coalescing into plaques in certain regions. (C) Interstitial GA may present as an erythematous A macule (upper arm). (D) Typical presentation of a wide patch of morphea. www.medicaljournals.se/acta Granuloma annulare and morphea: correlation with B. burgdorferi and Chlamydia-related bacteria 357 1-Step (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to the Table II. Summary of histological findings manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was then performed at the Plasma cells sequencing unit of the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland. BLAST analysis was

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us