6/30/11 1 NEO Inventories Bibliography for the NEO Personality Inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3) Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R™) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3) ______________________________________________________________________ Paul T. Costa, Jr., Ph.D., and Robert R. McCrae, Ph.D. Note: Articles are listed under one heading, but may be relevant to several. Users are advised to search the entire bibliography for relevant terms. Personality Structure and Assessment................................................................. 2 Personality Correlates ................................................................................. 31 Counseling, Clinical Psychology, and Psychiatry ..................................... 62 Stress, Coping, and Well-Being .................................................................. 90 Behavioral and Molecular Genetics ........................................................... 99 Personality Development and Aging ........................................................ 107 Health Psychology, Behavioral Medicine, and Biological Psychology .. 117 Industrial/Organizational and Career Psychology ................................. 134 Reviews and Commentary ........................................................................ 148 Translations ................................................................................................ 150 6/30/11 2 Personality Structure and Assessment Ahn, C. K., & Chae, J. H. (1997). Standardization of the Korean version of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Korean Journal of Counseling & Psychotherapy, 9, 443-473. AkIn, A., Eroglu, Y., KayIs, A. R., & SatIcI, S. A. (2010). The validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the relational-interdependent self-construal scale. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 579-584. Akrami, N., Hedlund, L., & Ekehammar, B. (2007). Personality scale response latencies as self-schema indicators: The inverted-U effect revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 611-618. Allik, J., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Escapable conclusions: Toomela (2003) and the universality of trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 261-265. Allik, J., Mõttus, R., & Realo, A. (2010). Does national character reflect mean personality traits when both are measured by the same instrument? Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 62-69. Allik, J., Realo, A., Mõttus, R., & Kuppens, P. (2010). Generalizability of self-other agreement from one personality trait to another. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 128-132. Allik, J., Realo, A., Mõttus, R., Borkenau, P., Kuppens, P., & Hrebícková, M. (2010). How people see others is different from how people see themselves: a replicable pattern across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 870-882. Allik, J., Realo, A., Mõttus, R., Esko, T., Pullat, J., & Metspalu, A. (2010). Variance determines self- observer agreement on the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 421- 426. Almeida, L., Azevedo, B., Nunes, T., Vaz-da-Silva, M., & Soares-da-Silva, P. (2007). Why healthy subjects volunteer for Phase I studies and how they perceive their participation? European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 63, 1085-1094. Aluja, A., García, Ó., & García, L. F. (2002). A comparative study of Zuckerman’s three structural models for personality through the NEO-PI-R, ZKPQ-III-R, EPQ-RS and Goldberg’s 50-bipolar adjectives. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 713-726. Aluja, A., García, Ó., & García, L. F. (2003). Psychometric proterties of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman personality questionnaire (ZKPQ-III-R): A study of a shortened form. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1083-1098. Aluja, A., Garcia, O., & Garcia, L. F. (2004). Replicability of the three, four and five Zuckerman's personality super-factors: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the EPQ-RS, ZKPQ and NEO-PI-R. Personality & Individual Differences, 36, 1093-1108. Aluja, A., Garcia, O., Garcia, L. F., & Seisdedos, N. (2005). Invariance of the NEO-PI-R factor structure across exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1879-1889. Aluja, A., Garcia, O., Rossier, J., & Garcia, L. F. (2005). Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 591-604. Aluja, A., Kuhlman, M., & Zuckerman, M. (2010). Development of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ): A factor/facet version of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ). Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 416-431. Aluja, A., Rossier, J., Garcia, L. F., & Verardi, S. (2005). The 16PF5 and the NEO-PI-R in Spanish and Swiss samples: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Individual Differences, 26, 53-62. Andersen., P., & Nordvik, H. (2002). Possible Barnum effect in the Five-Factor Model: Do respondents accept random NEO Personality Inventory-Revised scores as their actual trait profile? Psychological Reports, 90, 539-545. Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1994). Temperament and the Big Five factors of personality. In C. F. Halverson, Jr., G. A. Kohnstamm, & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 69-90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 6/30/11 3 Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Spinath, F. M. (2004). Investigating the ZKPQ-III-R: Psychometric properties, relations to the Five-Factor Model, and genetic and environmental Influences on its scales and facets. In R. M. Stelmack, (Ed), On the psychobiology of personality: Essays in honor of Marvin Zuckerman. (89-105). New York: Elsevier Science. Ansell, E. B., & Pincus, A. L. (2004). Interpersonal perceptions of the Five-Factor Model of personality: An examination using the structural summary method for circumplex data. Multivariate Behavior Research, 39, 167-201. Asendorpf, J. B., Borkenau, P., Ostendorf, F., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2001). Carving personality description at its joints: Confirmation of three replicable personality prototypes for both children and adults. European Journal of Personality, 15, 169-198. Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., & Egan, V. (2006). Individual differences in response scale use: Mixed Rasch modelling of responses to NEO-FFI items. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1235-1245. Austin, E. J., Deary, I. J., Gibson, G. J., McGregor, M. J., & Schouten, E. (1998). Individual response spread in self-report scales: Personality correlations and consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 421-438. Avdeyeva, T. V. (2005). Testing the cross-cultural generalizability of personality types: A Philippine study. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 66(1-B), 198. Averill, J. R. (1999). Individual differences in emotional creativity: Structure and correlates. Journal of Personality, 67, 331-371. Avia, M. D., Sanz, J., Sanchez, M., & Silva, F.(1993, July). The Five-Factor Model in Spain: Relations of the NEO-PI with other variables. In M. D. Avia (Chair), The Five-Factor Model in Europe: Recent developments. Symposium presented at the Sixth Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences, Baltimore, MD. Avia, M. D., Sanz, J., Sánchez-Bernardos, Martínez-Arias, Silva, R., & Graña, J. L. (1995). The Five- Factor Model--II. Relations of the NEO-PI with other personality variables. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 81-97. Aziz, S. & Jackson, C. J. (2001). A comparison between three- and Five-Factor Models of Pakistani personality data. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1311-1319. Bäccman, C., & Carlstedt, B. (2010). A construct validation of a Profession-Focused Personality Questionnaire (PQ) Versus the FFPI and the SIMP. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 136-142. Backenstrass, M., Joest, K., Gehrig, N., Pfeiffer, N., Mearns, J., & Catanzaro, S. J. (2010). The German version of the Generalized Expectancies for Negative Mood Regulation Scale: A construct validity study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 26, 28-38. Bäckström, M., Björklund, F., & Larsson, M. R. (2009). Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 335-344. Baeckstroem, M., & Holmes, B. M. (2001). Measuring adult attachment: A construct validation of two self-report instruments. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,42, 79-86. Baer, R. A. (Chair). (2000, August). Validity scales for the NEO-PI-R. Symposium presented at the 108th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. Bagby, R. M., & Marshall, M. B. (2003). Positive impression management and its influence on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: A comparison of analog and differential prevalence group designs. Psychological Assessment, 2002, 15, 333-339. Ballenger, J. F.. Detecting positive impression management on the NEO-PI-R in a clinical population. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61(7), 3829B. Balluerka, N., Gorostiaga, A., Alonso-Arbiol, I., & Haranburu, M. (2007). Test adaptation to other cultures: A practical approach. Psicothema, 19, 124-133. Barbaranelli, C. (1993). Il modello dei Cinque Fattori: Analisi congiunta delle Comrey Personality Scales, del Questionario dei Cinque Fattori e del NEO Personality Inventory