Value Investing on the Nordic Stock Market Does the Magic Formula Constitute a Viable Strategy for Outperforming the Market?

Value Investing on the Nordic Stock Market Does the Magic Formula Constitute a Viable Strategy for Outperforming the Market?

Department of Economics NEKH01 – Bachelor Thesis Fall 2016 Value Investing on the Nordic Stock Market Does the Magic Formula constitute a viable strategy for outperforming the market? Authors: Supervisor: Emil Håkansson Dag Rydorff Pontus Kvarnmark Abstract In this thesis we investigate if following the magic formula can yield superior investment returns in relation to the risk taken. The magic formula is a term coined by Joel Greenblatt, describing a systematic approach to successful stock investing. The strategy identifies high value companies based on return on capital that are selling at a discount to their intrinsic value based on the company’s earnings yield. In order to examine the possible relation between the magic formula and superior investment returns, we back- test the formula on the Nordic stock market between 2007 and 2016. We compare the returns of the portfolio with the benchmark OMX Nordic 40. In order to determine if the portfolio has yielded high returns in relation to each unit of risk, we apply the Capital Asset Pricing Model as well as the Fama-French three-factor model. Using the CAPM for the period 2007 to 2016 we arrive at a monthly excess return of 1.27% and an annual excess return of 17.8%. Applying the three-factor model, we yield a monthly and annual excess return of 1.29% and 14.01% respectively. Excess returns are often attributed to having taken on excess risk or merely as the result of chance. The Sharpe ratio for the period 2007 to 2016 was 0.22 for the magic formula portfolio compared to 0.027 for the OMX Nordic 40. Testing if the Sharpe ratio of the magic formula is different from the Sharpe ratio of the market, it is evident that the results are statistically significant. The years following the financial crisis of 2008 are included in the test period. It is notable that although the magic formula portfolio is significantly less diversified than the OMX Nordic 40, it performed better during the setback of 2008 and 2009, and returned to pre-crisis levels more rapidly than the market portfolio. Key words: Value Investing, Sharpe Ratio, Nordic Stock Market, Magic Formula, CAPM, Fama-French three-factor model 1 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Results ............................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Outline ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2. Theory ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 The Efficient Market Hypothesis .......................................................................................... 7 2.2 Anomalies ...................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 The January Effect .............................................................................................................. 9 2.2.2 Price Earnings Effect ......................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Value Investing ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Theoretical Models .................................................................................................................. 12 2.4.1 The Capital Asset Pricing Model ................................................................................ 12 2.4.2 Three-Factor Model ........................................................................................................ 13 2.4.3 Sharpe Ratio ...................................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Definitions .................................................................................................................................. 16 2.5.1 EBIT ...................................................................................................................................... 16 2.5.2 Return on Capital ............................................................................................................. 17 2.5.3 Enterprise Value .............................................................................................................. 17 2.5.4 Earnings Yield ................................................................................................................... 17 2.5.5 Systematic risk ................................................................................................................. 18 3. Magic Formula Theory .................................................................................................... 19 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 19 3.2 The Magic Formula .................................................................................................................. 19 3.3 Ranking ........................................................................................................................................ 20 3.4 Magic Formula Risk ................................................................................................................. 21 3.5 Prior Research (Magic Formula) ........................................................................................ 22 4. Data & Method .................................................................................................................... 24 4.1 Data ............................................................................................................................................... 24 4.2 Method ......................................................................................................................................... 25 4.3 Problems ..................................................................................................................................... 29 5. Results & Analysis ............................................................................................................. 31 5.1 Absolute Returns ..................................................................................................................... 31 5.2 Volatility ...................................................................................................................................... 32 2 5.3 Capital Asset Pricing Model ................................................................................................. 36 5.4 Three-Factor Model ................................................................................................................ 36 5.5 Sharpe Ratio ............................................................................................................................... 37 6. Conclusions ......................................................................................................................... 39 7. Further Research .............................................................................................................. 41 8. References ........................................................................................................................... 42 9. Appendix .............................................................................................................................. 44 9.1 Databases .................................................................................................................................... 44 9.2 Portfolios ..................................................................................................................................... 44 9.3 Removed Companies .............................................................................................................. 50 9.4 Performance .............................................................................................................................. 53 9.5 Datastream formulas .............................................................................................................. 55 3 1. Introduction The principal theory among academics and institutional investors in recent years has become the theory of efficient markets. Originally explained by Fama (1970), the hypothesis states that the pursuit of excess returns on the financial markets is folly, as asset prices always reflect all available information. Fama (1970) argues that excess returns over a given time period are merely the result of either chance or of taking on excess risk. This understanding of financial markets has gained criticism from a group within the investing community called value investors. Perhaps the most widely recognized advocate of value investing is Warren Buffett, who on several occasions has questioned the implications of the efficient market hypothesis (Buffett, 1989). Proponents of a value-approach to investing argue, as advocated in Buffett’s 1984 article entitled The Super Investors of Graham-and-Doddsville, that the probability of several investors, all following the same investment

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    56 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us