Diammonium Phosphate As a Source of Nitrogen and Phosphorus for Beef Cattle by Gary L Cowman a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate

Diammonium Phosphate As a Source of Nitrogen and Phosphorus for Beef Cattle by Gary L Cowman a Thesis Submitted to the Graduate

Diammonium phosphate as a source of nitrogen and phosphorus for beef cattle by Gary L Cowman A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Animal Science Montana State University © Copyright by Gary L Cowman (1962) Abstract: Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the use of diammonium phosphate as a supplemental source of nitrogen and phosphorus for beef cattle. Experiment I was designed to compare diammonium phosphate with mono-ammonium phosphate, urea, and soybean oil meal, as an added nitrogen source to wintering and fattening rations fed to steers. Thirty-two Hereford steer calves were used in this study. The steers were on the wintering trial for 112 days and the fattening trial 168 days. During the wintering trial, the steers were individually fed a low protein ration once daily. All of the steers in both trials received the same basal ration, the only difference among treatments being in the added source of nitrogen in each of the eighteen percent protein supplements. Lot 1 received monoammonium phosphate; Lot 2, diammonium phosphate; Lot 3, urea; and Lot 4, soybean oil meal. The basal ration fed during the wintering period consisted of steam-rolled barley, dried molasses beet pulp, and grass hay. During the fattening trial, the high-concentrate basal ration was self-fed, (eighty percent steam-rolled barley, twenty percent dried molasses beet pulp) . In both trials, the steers received one pound of eighteen percent protein supplements furnishing the additional nitrogen. The steers remained in the same lots and on the same sources of -supplemental nitrogen throughout both feeding trials. There were no significant differences among the weight gains made by the four lots of steers, during either the wintering or fattening trial. Only small differences were noted among the four lots of steers during the wintering trial. In the fattening trial, steers fed part of the added nitrogen as soybean oil meal required 7.5 percent less feed per pound of gain and gained 0.26 pound more daily than those steers fed part of the added nitrogen as monoammonium phosphate. In experiment II, diammonium phosphate and defluorinated phosphate were compared as supplemental sources of phosphorus at three levels of percent phosphorus intake. The levels used were 0.18, 0.24, and 0.30 percent phosphorus of the total ration. The thirty-two Hereford heifer calves used as the experimental animals were divided into eight treatments of four head each. The heifers were individually fed during the 140-day wintering trial. All of the heifers received the same low-phosphorus basal ration, the only difference among treatments being in either the added source or level of phosphorus in each of the twenty percent prothin supplements. The two control lots received a 0.12 percent phosphorus ration. Differences between plasma-inorganic phosphorus levels of heifers fed the control ration and heifers fed added phosphorus rations were significant (P<.05), and highly significant (P<.01) for the heifers fed 0.30 percent phosphorus rations. The differences between the plasma phosphorus levels of heifers fed 0.18 and 0.30 percent phosphorus rations were significant (P<.05). There were no apparent differences between the heifers fed rations supplemented with diammonium phosphate or defluorinated phosphate. DIAMMONIUM PHOSPHATE. AS A SOURCE OF NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS FOR BEEF CATTLE by GARY Lo COWMAN A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree o, MASTER OF SCIENCE in Animal Science Approved; /kjL^i JL ______________ ■ Head, Major Department Chairman,,Examining Committee Dead, Gradua^y Division MONTANA STATE COLLEGE Bozeman, Montana August, 1962 -iii- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to Dr, 0, 0. Thomas for his sincere and invaluable guidance throughout my graduate program, in the organization and conduction of the experiments and his suggestions in the preparation of the manuscript, Appreciation is ex­ pressed also to Dr, L. 6. Young for his advice and suggestions in the preparations of the manuscript, . Sincere appreciation is expressed to my wife, Farrell, for her help, understanding and encouragement during my graduate work. The assistance of Lyle Myers, who aided in the collection of data, is also appreciated. Appreciation is expressed to Monsanto Chemical Company for a grant-in- aid which supported the trials. T TABLE OF CONTENTS Page VITA .................................. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............. ill INDEX TO TABLES ............ ............................ vi INDEX TO APPENDIX .............................. viii ABSTRACT .................... Ix INTRODUCTION . ....................................................... I REVIEW OF LITERATURE .;...... ................................ 2 THE BIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF P H O S P H O R U S ......... 2 PHOSPHORUS REQUIREMENTS OF BEEF CATTLE . .................. 4 FACTORS AFFECTING THE UTILIZATION OF PHOSPHORUS ................ 6 Calcium-phosphorus ratio ....... .......... ..... 6 Vitamin D ............ 7 Trace minerals .................................. 8 METHODS OF DETERMINING THE AVAILABILITY OF PHOSPHORUS FOR BEEF CATTLE ............. .......................... 8 Blood levels.............. 8 Weight gains and feed u t i l ization....................... 10 Bone studies ............. ............ .... 11 Balance studies . ........................................... 12 Laboratory methods . ............ 13 BIOLOGICAL AVAILABILITY OF DIFFERENT SOURCES OF PHOSPHORUS . 13 Defluorinated products.................... 14 Other inorganic phosphates.................... 16 -=V- Page Phytin phosphorus ..... .......................... 18 PAIATABILITY OF PHOSPHORUS SUPPLEMENTS ........... 19 UTILIZATION OF NON-PROTEIN NITROGEN BY RUMINANTS .......... 19 Urea .......................... 20 Ammoniated products . :. 23 Urea toxicity 90000000440 OOO OOOO . 24 UTILIZATION OF DIAMMONIUM PHOSPHATE IN RUMINANT RATIONS . 26 EXPERIMENT I — DIAMMONIUM PHOSPHATE AS A NITROGEN SOURCE FOR BEEF CATTLE ............................. 27 PROCEDURE . L . 9*9*090*9 . 27 Wintering trial . , . 27 Fattening trial .... „ . 30 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION » . 33 Wintering trial *00*090*00««* . 33 Fattening trial . 40 SUMMARY . 44 EXPERIMENT II — DIAMMONIUM PHOSPHATE AS A SOURCE OF PHOSPHORUS FOR WINTERING HEIFER CALVES ....................... 46 PROCEDURE ...... 46 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 00000909900. 51 SUMMARY . 58 LITERATURE CITED . 0*00**9000**0**00*. 60 APPENDIX **0* 0 *00**9* 00* ***9**000. 69 -vi- INDEX TG TABLES Table Page I. - Experimental Design and Sourbes of Supplemental Nitrogen Fed During Wintering'Trial of Experiment I, ......... 28 II. Composition of the Supplemental Pellets Containing the Different Sources of Supplemental Nitrogen Fed During the Wintering Trial of Experiment I •................ 29 III. Composition of the Protein Supplements Containing the Different Sources of Supplemental Nitrogen Fed During the Fattening Trial of Experiment I .......... ............ 32 IV. Average Weight Gains, Daily Feed Intake, and Feed Efficiency of Steers Wintered on Rations Differing in Sources of Supplemental Nitrogen. Experiment I. (December 27, 1960 to ^lp ril 18, 1961 ■■ 112 days. ** . -. ............... 33 V. Analysis of Variance of Total Weight Gains of Steers Wintered on Rations Differing in Sources of Supplemental Nitrogen ........................... 34 VI. Average Daily Gains of Steers by 28-day Periods of Steers Fed Different Sources of Supplemental Nitrogen During the Wintering Trial of Experiment I „ 35 VII, Average Daily Feed Intake by 28-day Periods of Steers Fed Different Sources of Supplemental Nitrogen During the Wintering Trial of Experiment I ............... 36 VIII. Proximate Chemical Analysis of the Feeds Fed During the Wintering Trial of Experiment I ............... 37 IX. Total Daily Protein, Phosphorus, and Calcium Intake of Steers Wintered on Rations Differing in Sources of Supplemental Nitrogen .......... i ......... 38 X. Average Daily Crude Protein Consumption During Each 28-day Period of Steers-Wintered on Rations Differing in Sources of Supplemental Nitrogen ....... ............ ..... 38 XI. Analysis of Covariance for Final (Y) and Initial (X) Plasma- Inorganic Phosphorus Levels for Steers During Wintering Trial of Experiment I..................... 39 XII, Average Plasma-Anorganic Phosphorus Levels of Steers During Wintering Trial of Experiment I .........i...... 40 -vii - Table Page XIII. Weight Gains» Feed Consumption, and Feed Costs of Steers Fattened on Rations Differing in Sources of Supplemental Nitrogen. (April 18, 1961 to October 3, 1961 -- 168 Days) . 41 XIV. Average Daily Intake of Protein, Phosphorus, and Calcium for Steers Fed Rations Differing in Sources of Supplemental Nitrogen During the Fattening Trial of Experiment I . 43 XV. Proximate Chemical Analyses of the Feeds Used During the Fattening Trial of Experiment I .............. 43 XVI. Experimental Design of Experiment II Comparing Two Sources of Supplemental Phosphorus Fed to Heifers at Various Levels. 47 XVII. Composition of the Protein Supplements Containing the Various Levels of Phosphorus From the Two Sources Fed During Experiment II ...... ........................ 49 XVIII. Average Weight Gains, Feed Consumption, and Feed Efficiency of Heifers on Experiment II Fed the Various Levels of Phosphorus from Two Sources. (January 2, 1962 to May 22, 1962 140 Days) .....................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    100 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us