
<p><strong>SELLWOOD BRIDGE </strong></p><p><strong>MAY 8, 2018 </strong></p><p><strong>PROJECT OVERVIEW </strong></p><p><strong>PROJECT OVERVIEW </strong></p><p>• Procurement: CMGC • Owner: Multnomah County • Location: Portland, Oregon • Contract Value: $227,000,000 • Construction Timeline: </p><p>• Started: December 2011 • Completed: January 2017 </p><p><strong>PROJECT TEAM </strong></p><p>• Agencies </p><p>• Multnomah County • City of Portland • Oregon Department of <br>Transportation </p><p>• Federal Highway Administration </p><p>• Designers/Consultants </p><p>• T. Y. Lin International • CH2M Hill • David Evans and Associates </p><p>• General Contractor </p><p>• Slayden/Sundt Joint Venture </p><p><strong>HISTORY </strong></p><p>• Originally a Ferry Crossing • Original Sellwood Bridge - Opened 1925 • In depth inspections - mid 1980’s & 2003 </p><p>• Further “Band aids” were installed • Loads Restrictions enforced in 2004 </p><p>• In-depth inspection/evaluation 2005 </p><p>• Structural rating - 2 out of 100 </p><p>Local RR Tracks <br>OR 43 to Portland </p><p>Cemetery </p><p>Willamette River </p><p>Sellwood </p><p>Landslide <br>Riverpark and Sellwood Harbor <br>Condos <br>OR 43 to </p><p>Lake Oswego </p><p><strong>CMGC PROCUREMENT </strong></p><p><strong>CMGC </strong></p><p><strong>CONSTRUCTION MANAGER/GENERAL CONTRACTOR </strong></p><p>•••</p><p>Collaboration between Owner, Designer, and Contractor Up to Date Market Pricing </p><p>Owner </p><p>Design development </p><p>••</p><p>Constructability Reviews Value Engineering </p><p>••••</p><p>ROW/TCE acquisition & Phasing Schedule Development Risk Management </p><p>Collaboration </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">A/E </li><li style="flex:1">GC </li></ul><p></p><p>Other Owner Drivers: </p><p>•••</p><p>Sustainability Public involvement Minority Goals </p><p><strong>PRECONSTRUCTION </strong></p><p>• 7 Amendments (Design Packages) </p><p>• Able to release packages early to start work </p><p>••••</p><p>Shoofly Landslide Condo Demo/Reconstruct Main Bridge - GMP </p><p>• 60%, 90%, and 100% cost estimates • After each pricing exercise adjustments are made to validate the design aligns with the owners budget </p><p>• Design Modifications • Value Engineering • Material Selections • Means and Methods Evaluated </p><p><strong>CONTRACTING PLAN </strong></p><p>• DMWESB Goal - 20% • Created a Contracting <br>Plan with the Owner: </p><p>• 4 Categories </p><p>• Project Final DMWESB: </p><p>• 20.41% </p><p>• <strong>$45,491,206 </strong></p><p><strong>SMALL GC PACKAGES </strong></p><p>• 4 scopes of work separated into <br>GC-type packages </p><p>• Subcontractor solicitation, best value scoring, and scope management for the entire scope. </p><p>• Condo Demolition and Reconstruct - <br>$3.7M </p><p>• Macadam Bay Neighborhood – <br>$2.7M </p><p>• Powers Marine Park – <br>$300,000 </p><p>• Miles Place & Butterfly Park – <br>$300,000 </p><p><strong>BEST VALUE SCORING </strong></p><p><strong>Maximum Available Points </strong><br><strong>Selection Criteria </strong></p><p>Multi-Use Bridge, Surveying, QC Testing </p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Marine Package </li><li style="flex:1">All Other Open Bid </li></ul><p>Packages <br>Structural Steel Package </p><p><strong>Cost </strong></p><p>65 <br>5<br>40 20 <br>40 <br>5<br>40 15 </p><p><strong>DMWESB Participation Safety Record </strong></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">15 </li><li style="flex:1">10 </li></ul><p>15 <br>10 15 <br>15 15 </p><p><strong>Key Personnel Relative Experience </strong></p><p>10 <br>5<br>10 <br>5</p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">10 </li><li style="flex:1">10 </li></ul><p>5</p><p><strong>Sustainability Work Plan </strong></p><p>5<br>15 </p><p><strong>Total Points </strong></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">100 </li><li style="flex:1">100 </li><li style="flex:1">100 </li><li style="flex:1">100 </li></ul><p></p><p><strong>CRAFT DEVELOPMENT </strong></p><p>• Apprenticeship Program </p><p>• Required 20% Apprentice per trade per subcontract for all contracts over $100,000 </p><p>• Craft Diversity for Total Project </p><p>• 14% <br>Women </p><p>Minority <br>• 20% </p><p><strong>CONSTRUCTION CHALLENGES </strong></p><p><strong>MAINTAINING VEHICLES/PEDESTRIANS </strong></p><p>• 30,000 Vehicles/Day • Heavily use by <br>Pedestrians/Bicyclists </p><p>Issue to be solved by proposers: </p><p>• Build bridge on exact footprint • No more than 30 days full closure </p><p><strong>ORIGINAL PLAN </strong></p><p>• Multnomah County intended to build the new bridge in halves. </p><p>• Maintain the existing structure while building the south half • Demolish the existing bridge • Build the North half </p><p>• Downfalls </p><p>• Environmental impacts due to additional cofferdams • Public/Worker safety • Redundant Structural Features • Schedule • Cost </p><p><strong>THE SHOOFLY </strong></p><p>• Use the existing Steel Truss for the Temporary Detour </p><p>• Install Temporary Piers in the River </p><p>• Construct new temporary approaches </p><p>• Translate the steel truss onto the Temporary Piers </p><p>• Use Shoofly while the new <br>Bridge was constructed <br>Approach to shoofly <br>Pile driving for temporary bents </p><p><strong>THE TASK </strong></p><p>• Truss </p><p>• 6.8 million pounds (3,400 tons) • 1,095 feet long </p><p>• Translate </p><p>• 66 feet North at West End • 33 feet North at East End • 7:30am to 9:30pm (14 hours) </p><p>• Jacks </p><p>• Horizontal – 5 pairs of 165,000lb capacity/jack <br>• Lifting – 40 (8 per pier) of 330,000 lb capacity/jack </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>JANUARY 19</strong><sup style="top: -0.6em;"><strong>TH</strong></sup><strong>, 2013 “THE MOVE” </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>SHOOFLY COMPLETE </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>SHOOFLY BENEFITS </strong></li></ul><p></p><p>• Cost Savings - $5,000,000 • Cut 1 year off the schedule • Reduced the Environmental Impacts • Simplified the Phasing • Design Redundancy was eliminated – Sleeker Structure • Safety – Separated Public from Workers • Less the 20 days of bridge closures for the entire project </p><p><strong>LANDSLIDE STABILIZATION </strong></p><p><strong>LANDSLIDE </strong></p><p>• Entire West Approach constructed on an ancient landslide </p><p>• Original Bridge moved 3’ • Stabilization Shear Piles and Ground Anchors </p><p>• Landslide Monitored throughout construction to establish final design requirements </p><p><strong>LANDSLIDE STABILIZATION </strong></p><p>72” Diameter Shafts - 2,800 LF Ground Anchors – 92 EA </p><p><strong>LANDSLIDE STABILIZATION </strong></p><p>Ground Anchors were restressed to final design after the Bridge was completed </p><p><strong>PERCHED BOX CAISSONS </strong></p><p><strong>TRADITIONAL IN-WATER PIERS </strong></p><p>• 90-foot sheet piles driven into cobbles & boulders </p><p>• In-water-work Restrictions & <br>Schedule Impacts </p><p>• Large Concrete Seal & Footing • Full Height Piers • Scour would be up to 65 feet • Costly </p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages45 Page
-
File Size-