Nathan Seiberg

Nathan Seiberg

QED3 Nathan Seiberg IAS Analyzing a Lagrangian QFT Semiclassical physics, mostly in the UV (reliable, straightforward, but can be subtle) • Global symmetry and its ‘t Hooft anomalies • Weakly coupled limits: flat directions, small parameters, … Quantum physics in the IR (mostly conjectural) • Consistency with the global symmetry (including ‘t Hooft anomalies) and the various semiclassical limits • Approximate methods: lattice, bootstrap, , 1/ , … • Integrability • String constructions 2 QED3 [Many references using various methods] Simple, characteristic example, demonstrating surprising phenomena. Many applications. • (1) gauge field • fermions with charges and masses • A bare Chern-Simons term. – Label the theory as 1 with a parameter . – When all the fermions are massive, at low energies a TQFT 1 with = + sign . 1 2 Since , 1 2 ∑ + . ∈ ℤ 2 2 3 � ∈ ℤ Global symmetries • Charge-conjugation : (with appropriate action on the fermions) → − • 1 , = 0 time-reversal : ( , ) , ( , ) , 0 0 0 (with appropriate action on the fermions )→ − → − − • Standard algebra on all the fundamental fields = = 1 2 = 1 • For equal charges and masses2 − more symmetries, e.g. − . 4 Global magnetic (topological) symmetry • 1 symmetry: = . 1 • The charged operators are monopole operators (like 2 a disorder operator). – Remove a point from spacetime and specify boundary conditions around it. • Massless fermions have zero modes, which can lead to “funny” quantum numbers. 5 Global magnetic (topological) symmetry In many applications, the magnetic symmetry is approximate or absent • In lattice constructions • When the gauge (1) is embedded at higher energies in a non-Abelian gauge group • When the gauge 1 is emergent • In the generalization of the gauge 1 2 to ( ) with higher (only a magnetic symmetry). ≅ ℤ2 It is natural to break 1 explicitly by adding a monopole operator to the Lagrangian. 6 Example: 1 , = 1 with = 1 1 + 2 • Since cannot vanish, ∈ isℤ violated (parity anomaly). • All gauge invariant polynomials in the fundamental fields are bosons. • All gauge invariant monopole operators are bosons. – 1 simplest monopole operator has spin 0 1 – 1 2 simplest monopole operator has spin 1 3 2 7 Example: 1 , = 2 with = 1 [Cordova, Hsin, NS] 0 • All gauge invariant polynomials in the fundamental fields are bosons with integer flavor (isospin) (2). • All gauge invariant monopole operators are bosons with flavor (2) isospin = mod 1. • On a single monopole = 1. More generally, 2 = 2 = 1 rather than the standard2 2−= = 1 = +1. − Related, but distinct statements2 in [Wang,2 T. Senthil; Metlitski, Fidkowski, Chen, Vishwanath; Witten] and− see also Hsin’s poster. 8 Examples: 1 , = 1 with = 2 [Cordova, Hsin, NS] 0 • All gauge invariant polynomials in the fundamental fields are bosons. • All gauge invariant monopole operators have spin = mod 1, i.e. 1 = 1 2 – In the previous example “fractional” isospin. Here “fractional” spin.− − • Standard -symmetry = 1 2 9 − Break the magnetic (1) symmetry [Cordova, Hsin, NS; Gomis, Komargodski, NS] • Add to the Lagrangian a charge 2 monopole operator. – Cannot add a charge 1 monopole – it is a fermion. • It breaks the – magnetic symmetry 1 : 1 – -symmetry → 2 − • But it preserves another time-reversal symmetry (a subgroup of the original symmetry) = ′ 2 10 Break the magnetic (1) symmetry [Cordova, Hsin, NS; Gomis, Komargodski, NS] = ′ 2 • Its algebra is non-standard = ( 1) ’ ′ = 1 ′ = 1 2’ =1 − 1 − − and do not commute.2 ≠ − is not a conventional time-reversal symmetry, but 풯 is. 풯 11 풯 What is the long distance behavior? • What are the phases? – Gapped? Topological? – Symmetry breaking? • What happens at the phase transitions? First or second order? – And if second order, free or interacting? • It is clear for large 1 1 − + ? < 0 > 0 12 CONJECTURES AHEAD 13 Vary at large | | or at large • Large . Essentially free fermions with a modified Gauss law constraint • Large . Second-order transition as a function of the fermion mass [Appelquist, Nash, Wijewardhana] • Conjecture that this is the case for all , , and . (1) (1) 1 2 1 2 − + < 0 2 >20 Second order transition at = 0 14 1 , = 1 with charge one ( = 1) 1 / flows to the (2) Wilson-Fisher fixed point [Chen, Fisher, Wu; Barkeshli, McGreevy; NS, T. Senthil, Wang, Witten;1 Karch2 , Tong] • The spin-zero monopole operator of the gauge theory is the order parameter of the (2) model. • Emergent -symmetry in the IR 1 flows to a fixed point with (3) symmetry / [Aharony, Benini, Hsin, NS; Benini, Hsin, NS] 3 2 • The spin-one monopole operator of the gauge theory becomes a conserved current in O 2 (3). • Several dual bosonic and fermionic descriptions → 15 1 , = 2 with = 1 [Xu, You; Karch, Tong; Hsin, NS; Benini, Hsin, NS; Wang, Nahum,0 Metlitski, Xu, T. Senthil] • Microscopically: global (2), (they do not commute), and -symmetry – and have a non-standard algebra = = 1 • Conjectured IR2 behavior:2 fixed point with enhanced − global (4) symmetry • Dual fermionic description: 1 with = 2 – Its (2) flavor symmetry includes the original 0 1 , and vice versa. 16 1 , = 2 with = 1 [Benini, Hsin, NS; Komargodski, NS] 0 Break the magnetic symmetry by adding to the Lagrangian a double monopole operator • This explicitly breaks the flavor 2 1 and the magnetic 1 . → • For some range of the2 remaining flavor 1 symmetry is spontaneously→ ℤ broken. – The UV theory is massive, but the IR theory is gapless! Goldstone boson < 0 > 0 (2) Wilson-Fisher fixed points 17 1 , = 1 with = 2 [Cordova, Hsin, NS] 0 • Flows to a free Dirac fermion and a decoupled 1 TQFT – Similar, but not identical to [Son; Wang, T. Senthil; 2 Metlitski, Vishwanath; NS, T. Senthil, Wang, Witten]. • The monopole operator in the UV becomes the free fermion in the IR. • The Wilson line with charge 1 in the UV is described as the Wilson line of 1 (semion). 2 18 Break the magnetic (1) symmetry [Cordova, Hsin, NS; Gomis, Komargodski, NS] Add to the Lagrangian a charge 2 monopole operator. = • It preserves with a nonstandard algebra ′ 2 • In the IR it splits the fixed point with a massless Dirac fermion to two points with massless Majorana fermions 1 1 1 2 2 2 < 0 > 0 Massless Majorana fermions 19 Summary QED3: 1 gauge theory with charged fermions. • Subtle global symmetry, especially in the action on monopoles – Fractional (global symmetry) charges and spins – Unusual algebras involving and • Conjectures about the IR behavior of these systems – Enhanced global symmetry – Dual descriptions This is a tiny part of a long story about the dynamics of 2+1 dimensional QFT. Most of it is still unknown… 20.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us