TITLE PAGE the Politics of Education and the Misrecognition of Wales

TITLE PAGE the Politics of Education and the Misrecognition of Wales

TITLE PAGE The politics of education and the misrecognition of Wales Sally Power, WISERD, Cardiff University, Wales This paper examines the positioning of the Welsh education system within contemporary policy debate and analysis. It begins by outlining some of the ways in which education policy and provision in Wales differs from that of its neighbour, England, and then goes on to critique how these differences have been represented in both the media and by members of the educational research community. Indeed, the paper argues that these representations constitute a form of misrecognition. It is tempting to counter this misrecognition with assertions of the superiority of the ‘Welsh way’ – and certainly pronouncements of a ‘crisis’ in Welsh education appear to be as much politically-driven as evidence-based. However, such an approach would underplay the very real challenges that face Wales – challenges which are both like and unlike those facing England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. The paper concludes that we need a serious engagement with national divergences across the four nations of the UK – as well as elsewhere. The case of Wales highlights the need to undertake not only comparative analysis but also relational analysis if we are to enhance our understanding of the changing politics of education. Keywords: Wales, progressivism, universalism, misrecognition, policy research Biographical note: Sally Power is a Professor in the School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University. She is a co- director of WISERD (Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research Data and Method) and director of WISERDEducation which is following the progress of four cohorts of children and young people in Wales. She has undertaken extensive research on education policy and is interested in the relationship between social background, disadvantage and educational trajectories. Contact details: Professor Sally Power WISERD, Cardiff University 46 Park Place Cardiff CF10 3BB Wales Telephone number : 029 2087 4738 Email: [email protected] 1 The politics of education and the misrecognition of Wales Sally Power, WISERD, Cardiff University, Wales This paper examines the positioning of the Welsh education system within contemporary policy debate and analysis. It begins by outlining some of the ways in which education policy and provision in Wales differs from that of its neighbour, England, and then goes on to critique how these differences have been represented in both the media and by members of the educational research community. Indeed, the paper argues that these representations constitute a form of misrecognition. It is tempting to counter this misrecognition with assertions of the superiority of the ‘Welsh way’ – and certainly pronouncements of a ‘crisis’ in Welsh education appear to be as much politically-driven as evidence-based. However, such an approach would underplay the very real challenges that face Wales – challenges which are both like and unlike those facing England, Scotland and Northern Ireland. The paper concludes that we need a serious engagement with national divergences across the four nations of the UK – as well as elsewhere. The case of Wales highlights the need to undertake not only comparative analyses but also relational analyses if we are to enhance our understanding of the changing politics of education. Keywords: Wales, progressivism, universalism, misrecognition, policy research Education in Wales has long been the site of political struggle. Over the centuries, there have been ongoing confrontations, particularly around religion and language, as Wales was governed by administrations in London whose principal concerns were with England (Jones and Roderick 2003). Not only did those in Westminster take little account of the differences between England and Wales, but after the electoral victory of Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative Party in 1979, the Welsh found themselves subjected to reforms by a political party which had only ever received minority support in Wales. In 1997, the people of Wales voted in favour of political devolution. As a result, the National Assembly for Wales was established in 1999 and given responsibility for the governance of key areas of policy, including health and education. It was therefore not surprising that the newly-formed Welsh Government sought to distance itself from the neoliberal politics which had characterised successive London-based governments, not only the new right agenda of Margaret Thatcher, but also the ‘third way’ New Labourism of Tony Blair. In 2002, Rhodri 2 Morgan, the First Minister, made his now famous ‘clear red water’ speech which outlined the different approach that Wales would take: Our commitment to equality leads directly to a model of the relationship between the government and the individual which regards that individual as a citizen rather than as a consumer. Approaches which prioritise choice over equality of outcome rest, in the end, upon a market approach to public services, in which individual economic actors pursue their own best interests with little regard for wider considerations. (Morgan 2002) These wider considerations have usually involved the pursuit of greater social justice. Drakeford (2007), former advisor to Rhodri Morgan and now Assembly Member and Minister, argues that the Welsh commitment to social justice is based on a series of core principles which include a belief that ‘good government is good for you’, a commitment to progressive universalism, high rather than low trust, a strong ethic of participation and a commitment to ensuring greater equality of outcome. Table 1 outlines, albeit somewhat crudely, some of the contrasts between the dominant political discourses in Wales and England in recent decades. TABLE ONE SHOULD GO ABOUT HERE Even before parliamentary devolution, when Wales was subject to the same policy regimes and legislative measures as England, the Welsh political and cultural context gave Welsh education a distinctive complexion. Since devolution, this distinctiveness has become ever more apparent, as it evident in some of the key policies outlined in the next section.1 Good government is good for you The Welsh starting point that ‘good government is good for you’ stands in stark contrast to the ideologies underpinning England’s public sector reforms. Since the 1980s, education policies in England have been driven by an assumption that the notion of good government is oxymoronic and that, in general, government is ‘bad for you’. Successive neoliberal administrations have tried to lessen what they saw as the ‘dead hand of the state’ on schools, 1Because it is impossible to cover the range of policies that have been introduced in Wales at all phases since 1999, the analysis is based on only a selection of what might be seen as the ‘key’ policies in the compulsory phase. 3 teachers and parents and reduce the power of what were sometimes referred to as ‘local education monopolies’ (Flew 1991). In England, the capacity of local authorities to redistribute resources and target areas of need has been significantly weakened as almost all funding is now devolved directly to schools. In England, Conservative governments have sought to remove state-maintained schools from the control of their local authorities entirely through encouraging schools to operate independently of local government. Indeed, a significant number of local authorities in England have had their education services privatised. Even before devolution, local authorities in Wales were seen as integral to the governance and administration of education. The Grant-Maintained (GM) Schools policy, ushered in with the National Curriculum as part of the 1988 Education Reform Act, applied to both England and Wales. Butonly very few schools in Wales (less than 1.5 percent of the total number of GM schools)elected to ‘opt out’ of local authority control. And while schools in Wales have been given responsibility for budgets, a significant proportion of funding is still retained at local authority level to provide a range of supplementary services. In 2011, England, 90 percent of the total school budget was delegated directly to schools in England. In Wales, the figure was only 70 percent.2 Furthermore, since parliamentary devolution, Wales has not sought to weaken the principle of local authority control through either privatisation or through encouraging schools to operate independently. Even where local authorities have been assessed by Estynto be unsatisfactory, the solution is not seen to reside in reducing government control but rather instrengtheningit. 3 Progressivism Over the last few decades, English education policy has increasingly been characterised by a need to return to the past, while the Welsh Government has upheld the virtues of progressivism.The contrasting orientations to traditionalism and progressivism can be seen in the extent to which England and Wales have developed different curricular and assessment regimes. As already mentioned, the 1988 Education Reform Act which ushered in the National 2 This proportion has increased since 2011 (DfE 2014), but the subsequent diversification of school types in England makes it impossible to make direct comparisons between the two countries. 3Two reports into local governance have recently been commissioned which have raised a number of issues about the ‘viability’ of such a small country having 22 local authorities. The Williams Report and the Hills Report have recommended a number of strategies including greater use

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    23 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us