13.1.2021 A9-0001/1 Amendment 1 Axel Voss, Emil Radev, Markus Ferber, Andrzej Halicki, Monika Hohlmeier, Peter Jahr, Ralf Seekatz, Norbert Lins, Esteban González Pons, Javier Zarzalejos, Sabine Verheyen, Sven Simon, Marlene Mortler, Asim Ademov, Andrey Novakov, Sven Schulze, Loucas Fourlas, Daniel Buda, Eva Maydell, Antonius Manders, Angelika Niebler, David McAllister, Jens Gieseke, Romana Tomc, Markus Pieper, Rainer Wieland, Jiří Pospíšil, Marion Walsmann, Christian Sagartz, Jeroen Lenaers, Christian Ehler, Lukas Mandl, Frances Fitzgerald, Daniel Caspary, Ivan Štefanec, Andrey Kovatchev, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou, Lena Düpont, Rasa Juknevičienė, Mircea-Gheorghe Hava, Stelios Kympouropoulos, Stefan Berger, Jan Olbrycht, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Christine Schneider, Vasile Blaga, Radan Kanev, Henna Virkkunen, Nuno Melo, Michaela Šojdrová, Franc Bogovič, Tomasz Frankowski, Esther de Lange, Pernille Weiss, Angel Dzhambazki, Tomáš Zdechovský, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Peter Pollák, Inese Vaidere, Christian Doleschal, Riho Terras, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Jorge Buxadé Villalba, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Michael Gahler, Aušra Maldeikienė, Hildegard Bentele, Angelika Winzig, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Alexander Bernhuber, Niclas Herbst, Alexander Yordanov, Simone Schmiedtbauer, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez, Georgios Kyrtsos Report A9-0001/2021 Gilles Lebreton on artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law in so far as the EU is affected in the areas of civil and military uses and of state authority outside the scope of criminal justice(2020/2013(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 72 Motion for a resolution Amendment 72. Notes that certain AI technologies 72. Notes that certain AI technologies enable the automation of information enable the automation of information processing and action on an unprecedented processing and action on an unprecedented scale, such as mass civil and military scale, such as mass civil and military surveillance, which poses a threat to surveillance, which poses a threat to fundamental rights, and paves the way for fundamental rights; calls for the scrutiny of unlawful intervention in state sovereignty; mass surveillance activities under calls for the scrutiny of mass surveillance international law, including as regards activities under international law, including questions of jurisdiction and enforcement; as regards questions of jurisdiction and expresses serious concerns about some enforcement; expresses serious concerns highly intrusive social scoring applications about some highly intrusive social scoring that have been developed, as they seriously applications that have been developed, as endanger the respect of fundamental rights; they seriously endanger the respect of calls for an explicit ban on the use of mass fundamental rights; calls for an explicit ban social scoring by public authorities as a on the use of mass social scoring by public way to restrict the rights of citizens; calls AM\1222234EN.docx PE662.833v01-00 EN United in diversityEN authorities as a way to restrict the rights of for the accountability of private actors citizens; calls for the accountability of under international law to be enhanced, private actors under international law to be given the decision-making hegemony and enhanced, given the decision-making control of certain private actors over the hegemony and control of certain private development of these technologies; calls, actors over the development of these in this context, on the Commission, the technologies; calls, in this context, on the Council and the Member States to pay Commission, the Council and the Member particular attention when negotiating, States to pay particular attention when concluding and ratifying international negotiating, concluding and ratifying agreements related to cross-border family international agreements related to cross- cases, and to ensure that in this context AI border family cases, such as international systems are always used under effective child abductions, and to ensure that in this human verification, and respect due context AI systems are always used under process within the EU and countries which effective human verification, and respect are signatories of these agreements; due process within the EU and countries which are signatories of these agreements; Or. en AM\1222234EN.docx PE662.833v01-00 EN United in diversityEN.