
AGORA ISSUE #3 LIVING UP TO HOW DEMOCRATIC AN INTERVIEW WITH TO COPY OR NOT TO ROMULUS AND WAS THE ROMAN DR. ADAM HART- COPY, THAT IS THE AUGUSTUS REPUBLIC? DAVIS QUESTION PAGE 2 PAGE 3 PAGES 4-5 PAGES 8-9 AGORA Professor Michael Scott delivering another unforgettable presidential lecture in January! Spring 2019 With a new programme of lectures to be seen this year, from Roman democracy to lectures for the year, there is with the few already having the influence of the Ancient no better time to showcase taken place proving to be as World on Shakespeare. the talents and interests of wonderful as ever. the members of the LSA CA On behalf of the team, enjoy! This newsletter covers some in the third issue of Agora. Alex Melling, Editor There are plenty of amazing equally wonderful topics, !1 AGORA ISSUE #3 Living Up To Romulus and Augustus SAM HOLDEN Romulus Augustus went by many names, for Hun, then after Attila died he joined the instance Momyllus and Romulus Augustulus, Western Roman Empire. Whilst serving under but today he is known as the last emperor of emperor Nepos, he was made ‘Master of the Western Roman Empire. You’d expect that Soldiers’ in 474 AD which meant he had the world’s most famous empire, with support of the troops. In 475 AD, (the year celebrated victories such as the Battle of after he was given his prestigious title!), he led Alesia and the Battle of the Catalaunian a coup d’état against Nepos. They clearly did Plains, would have gone out with a bang, or at not have much honour back then! After Nepos least some sort of heroic last stand. Instead, fled, Orestes had complete power over Italy the Germanic king, Odoacer gave him an but bizarrely he did not make himself annual pension of 6000 solidi and exiled him emperor. Instead he made his fourteen year to Campania where Romulus had family. old son, Romulus, emperor. This was very Slightly anti-climactic I know. pragmatic and calculating because his wife was Roman, meaning Romulus had more Romulus Augustus is perhaps quite a fitting Roman blood than he did, so he hoped the name for the last emperor of the Western public would accept him. Sadly, Roman blood Roman Empire, as Romulus was the first king did not help Momyllus. Maybe Orestes wanted of Rome and Augustus was the first emperor to hold the power without being in the of Rome. It’s almost like having your life flash limelight, so that if anything went wrong he before your eyes prior to your death but could easily get out. Much good that did him, instead it’s with an empire, and the flash is a as only ten months later a mutiny was led ten month period of a century of Roman against Romulus. Romulus gained power history. Despite the name being rather apt, it through his father and lost it because of him. did result in Romulus being belittled about it. Orestes had promised the German soldiers For example, Romulus was often swapped for that if they helped him to depose Nepos they Momyllus, meaning Little Disgrace, and would gain estates in Italy, but somehow sometimes Augustus was changed to Orestes had forgotten about this. The man Augustulus, which means Little Augustus. who led this mutiny, Odoacer, besieged Most historians still refer to him as Romulus Ticinum, took Orestes to Placentia and had Augustulus which shows how little his him executed in 476 AD and his brother was subjects respected him, which has continued killed in the fighting outside of Ravenna. After to this day, a century and a half later. Ravenna was captured, Romulus was forced to abdicate and was exiled to Castel dell’Ovo in Campania with an annual pension of 6000 solidi on the 4th September 476. After his abdication, very little was recorded of Romulus. We don’t even know when he died, or anything he did whilst he was there. He was only sixteen so presumably lived for quite a while after. The historian Cassiodorus suggests that he survived into the early 6th century AD. But apart from that nothing is known about him. He may have had children - Romulus Augustus deposed by Odoacer he may not. I doubt he tried to reclaim his throne, as I would assume that if he had attempted, it would have been recorded Even though today we regard him as the last somewhere. Romulus Augustus hardly lived Western Roman Emperor, the Eastern Roman up to his name sakes, but the collapse of the Emperor, Flavius Zeno, would not even Western Roman Empire was inevitable and he acknowledge Romulus as emperor. He still was simply the unlucky one to be the last recognised his predecessor, Julius Nepos, as Roman Emperor. Perhaps it was fate that emperor who was in exile in Dalmatia. This is somebody with a name like his, harking back because Romulus usurped the throne from to the birth of Rome, would end up being a Nepos, thanks to his father, Orestes. Orestes part of its death. was at one point an assistant to Attila the !2 AGORA ISSUE #3 How Democratic was the Roman Republic? DAN HUBBARD Today democracy is taken for granted in the the most powerful and influential body in western world as the best type of government Rome’s government. system – it may not be entirely perfect, but it is nevertheless generally considered to be the Working alongside to the Senate were the best form we have. What’s interesting legislative assemblies, of which the most however is that this was not always the case, important was the Centuriate Assembly. This indeed for the Romans to whom western was the assembly which formally passed civilisation owes so much democracy was an laws and elected the magistrates who did the anathema, a dangerous experiment which the day to day running of the Republic and Athenians had attempted and which had not controlled the army. Following reforms in worked. This may seem strange to modern the 3rd century BC the Assembly worked as eyes, given the Romans in the Republican era follows: it was divided in to 373 centuries, or did elect their magistrates had loathed the groups of citizens. These centuries were not idea of hereditary kingship, however Rome equally divided, but rather by wealth with was not a democracy. the rich having more centuries with fewer people in them while the poor had fewer centuries with more people. As the centuries each had one vote with the richest voting first and a simple majority was all that was needed to win, this meant that often the poorest centuries which represented the largest section of the Roman population often did not have a voice in the Centuriate Assembly which passed laws and elected the most important magistrates. Furthermore, the poorest in Roman society could never dream of standing for the elected magistracies as these were reserved Cicero Denounces Cataline, Cesare Maccari for those who met the high property qualification. Therefore, even after plebs, (1889) - an insight into what the Roman those of non-aristocratic blood, were allowed Senate looked like to stand for election it was still confined to the economic and social elite of Rome even if Firstly, the word “Republic”, coming from the in theory the only barrier to qualification Latin “res publica” had few of the was wealth. This meant that even if the connotations with representative democracy plebeian’s vote did count in an election they that it does today, it merely meant business were still ultimately only electing members done in public, in view of the people, in of the elite who would often put their contrast to kingship or tyranny. The republic interests above that of the majority of was loosely organised around to power bases, Roman citizens. the Senate and the assemblies of the people. All this considered I think it is impossible to The Senate was an entirely elitist body, made call Rome a democracy is any modern sense up of the three hundred or so richest men in of the word. Today the word democracy Rome who could stand for election to one of carries certain connotations from which it the number of magistracies. In theory the cannot being separated, first and foremost of Senate had limited power, it was not able to them being that each person should have pass laws on its own or decide on domestic one equally important vote, and that there policy. What the Senate could do however was should be few bars to office. However, on pass advisory decrees which while lacking the these requirements Rome was far from being authority of law were often followed by the democracy, and ultimately it is important to magistrates in power due to the prestige and remember that the Romans were just as esteem of the Senatorial body. Therefore, suspicious of democracy as they were while the Senate had little de jure power, for tyranny. much of the Republic’s history it was de facto !3 AGORA ISSUE #3 An Interview with Dr Adam Hart-Davis LIV SAMPLE & KATRINA KELLY Amidst all the excitement that comes with the lumbered out – not easy to jump out of a beginning of a new year of fascinating lectures paddling pool! at the Classical Association, Ambassador Liv Sample and Chair Katrina Kelly sat down with And then there’s Empedocles who lived at the Dr Adam Hart-Davis shortly before he was to other end of Sicily, and invented the idea of deliver the first lecture of the new academic the four elements, fire, water, earth, air.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages12 Page
-
File Size-