Ethnic Tourism and the Renegotiation of Tradition in Tana Toraja (Sulawesi, Indonesia)

Ethnic Tourism and the Renegotiation of Tradition in Tana Toraja (Sulawesi, Indonesia)

Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Anthropology: Faculty Publications and Other Works Faculty Publications Fall 1997 Ethnic Tourism and the Renegotiation of Tradition in Tana Toraja (Sulawesi, Indonesia) Kathleen M. Adams Loyola University Chicago, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/anthropology_facpubs Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Adams, K. (1997). "Ethnic Tourism and the Renegotiation of Tradition in Tana Toraja (Sulawesi, Indonesia)." Ethnology, 36(4), p. 309-320. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology: Faculty Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. © University of Pittsburgh, Department of Anthropology, 1997. ETIC TOURISMAND THE RENEGOTIATION OF TRADITIONIN TANATORAJA i (SULAWESI,INDONESIA) t \ KathleenM. Adams : I / 5 LoyolaUniversity of Chicago This article examines some of the political and symbolic issues inherent in the touristic renegotiation of Torajan ritual and history, chronicling the strategies whereby Torajans attempt to refashion outsider imagery to enhance their own personal standing and position in the Indonesian ethnic hierarchy. The author suggests that the Toraja case challenges the popular assumption that tourism promotion brings a complete loss of agency to indigenous peoples: Torajans not only engage in ingenious political strategies to enhance their group's image, but vigorously contest perceived threats to their identity and power. The author argues that such processes of self-conscious cultural reformulation do not necessarily imply a collapse in meanxng or emotive power; rather, the Toraja case lends support to recent calls to rethink the discourse of "authenticity" and "staged authenticity." (Toraja, tourism, Indonesia, ethnic imagery, invention of tradition) In Januaryof 1987?tourists descending from jets at the UjungPandang airport in SouthSulawesi, Indonesia, were greetedwith a mimeographedannouncement of an elaborate,pageantry-filled funeral ceremony to be held in the Torajahighlands for the late Ne' Ke'te'.2Using a smatteringof anthropologicalterminology, the pamphlet outlinedthe culturalfunctions of Torajanfuneral rituals, made reference to a Torajan origin myth, and presenteda schedule of events for the ten-day funeral ritual. Hoteliersand travel agents boasted that this was the first Torajanfuneral ceremony that would adhereto a definite time schedule;this time no tourists would be disappointedwith the last-minutepostponements so typical of Torajan rituals. Television newscastersdeclared that this promisedto be a atmly uniqueTorajan event: the largest, most elaborate,and impressivefilneral in several decades. As exceptionalas thls barrageof publicitywas, the funeral(which was for my former Torajanmentor) proved to be momentous,but for very differentreasons than those heraldedin the media. Since the early 1970s, tourists have been visiting the Toraja highlandsin ever-increasingnumbers. In 1994 alone, approximately53S700 foreign tourists and 205,000 domestictourists3 journeyed to the Torajahomeland, lured by guidebook accountsof Torajans'pageantry-Ellled funeral rituals, haunting burial cliffs, elaborate architecture,and breathtaking scenery. Touristic celebrity has precipitateda number of new issuesfor the Toraja,certain aspects of whichhave been discussedelsewhere (Adams 1984, 1993a, 1993b, 1995; Crystal 1977, 1994; Volkman 1987, 1990; Yamashita1994). This articleconcerns the ways in whichTorajan history and custom are being reshapedas a resultof tourismdevelopment. Over the past two decades, anthropologistsand historians have become increasingly concerned with processesof culturalconstruction and invention (cf. Wagner1981 [1975];Keesing and Tonkinson 309 ETHNOLOGYvol. 36 no. 4, Fall 1997, pp. 309-20. ETHNOLOGY, c/o Depaltmentof Anthropology,The University of Pittsburgh,Pittsburgh PA 15260 USA Copyrightt 1997 The University of Pittsburgh.All rights reserved. This content downloaded from 147.126.10.40 on Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:07:13 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 3 10 ETHNOLOGY 1982; Hobsbawm and Ranger 1983; Linnekin 1983, 1992; Handler and Linnekin 1984; Clifford 1988; Jackson 1989; Hanson 1989; Keesing 1989; White and Lindstrom 1993). As many have stressed, in order to advance our understandingof the construction of tradition, our questions must go beyond examinations of which aspects of culture are authentic and which are invented (White 1991:3). Closer attention must be paid to the processes whereby traditions are invented and the conditions under which custom is renegotiated. This article explores some of the microprocesses involved in the contemporaryrenegotiation of Toraja history and ritual practice. Whereas the majority of studies of the zinvention of traditionX concern the artificial creation of ritual traditions by colonial governments or indigenous elites, the focus here is on a different sort of context in which tradition is negotiated: that of ethnic tourism. As the Toraja case suggests, encounters with foreign tourists (and a national government interestedin further stimulatingtourism revenues) are prompting new challenges to local forms of meaning, power, and identity. In short, ethnic tourism creates a fertile context for the reinterpretationof history and custom. SpeciE1cally,this essay explores the contemporary Torajan engagement with touristic imagery and chronicles the strategies whereby Torajans attempt to refashion this outsider imagery in order to enhance their position in the Indonesian hlerarchy of ethnic groups (as well as their own local standing). Various writers have suggested that ethnic tourism engenders zstaged authentici- ty" and zmuseumification''(cf. MacCannell 1973, 1976, 1992; Cohen 1988, 1989). That is, as a tourist-hostingsociety undergoeseconomic and culturalchanges through its intensifying contact with outsiders, efforts are made to stage the traditional cultural rituals and activities that are becoming increasingly rare and increasingly divorced from their original cultural significance. While the explosion of traditional Torajanarchitectural embellishments and family-runmuseums in tandemwith tourism development certainly resonates with this notion of staged authentlcity?the cases discussed in the following pages underscore the fact that self-conscious staging of rituals does not entail a loss of meaning for local people. Despite the fact that large- scale Torajanfunerals are increasinglysculpted to addressthe needs and expectations of visiting tourist dignitaries, these ritualevents continueto carrytremendous cultural significance for Torajan participants. As Crick (1989:336) so cogently asks in reflecting on the problematic concept of authenticity, zWhat in a culture is not staged? What does cultural authenticityconsist of?" Data here are drawn from fleldwork in the Toraja highlands in 1984-1985 and subsequent visits ln 19879 199l, 1992* and 1995. Central to the analysis are two events: the highly publicized funeral ritual referredto at the beginning of this article and a Local Guide Training Workshop in the Toraja highlands that sparked a reverberating emotional debate among Torajans. In different ways, both cases illustrate the issues central to Torajan efforts at ethnic imagery enhancement and address ongoing anthropological discussions about cultural authenticity and the invention of tradition. This content downloaded from 147.126.10.40 on Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:07:13 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE RENEGOTIATIONOF TRADITION IN TANA TORAJA 311 THE SA'DAN TORAJA:ETHNOGRAPHIC BACKGROUND The Sa'danToraja homeland is in TanaToraja Regency, a mountainousinterior regionof SouthSulawesi, Indonesia. Traditionally, most Torajans have been wet rice cultivators,although in recentyears many farmers have also plantedcash crops such as coffee andcloves. TodayTorajans can also be foundin a varietyof occupations, workingas teachers,bureaucrats, mining workers, servants, and tour guides in cities throughoutIndonesia. In a nationof over 185 million peopleSthe Sa'danToraja constitutea small minority,numbering approximately 350,000. The Torajapeople are marginalizedby geography,religion, and a diffusepower structure.Their closest neighborsare the IslamicizedBuginese and Makassarese peoples,the dominantethnic groups of SouthSulawesi. In contrastto the extensive kingdomsestablished by these neighboringBuginese and Makassarese,the Toraja neverunited into a centralizedpolitical unit. Traditionallys Torajans lived in scattered mountaintophouseholds, maintaining social ties throughan elaboratesystem of ritual exchanges(Nooy-Palm 1979, 1986). It was not until the arrivalof Dutch colonial forcesin 1906that the Torajawere formallybrought together under a single political authority. A few yearsafter the Dutchannexed the highlandsSmissionaries from the Dutch ReformedChurch began proselytizing among the Toraja.4Although conversion was initiallyslow, it gatheredmomentum in the 1950sand 1960s. Scholarsattribute the largenumber of conversionsduring this periodto two primaryfactors: inroads made by mission schools, and the newly independentIndonesian government's policy of actlvely encouragingpractitioners of indigenousreligions to convert to world religions

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us