Repaglinide Case Study

Repaglinide Case Study

High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Rapid Metabolite Characterization and Reaction Phenotyping: A Case Study with Repaglinide Joanna E. Barbara, Sylvie Kandel, Forrest Stanley and David B. Buckley A DIVISION OF XenoTech, LLC, 16825 W 116th St, Lenexa, KS, USA Introduction Tables and Figures Assessing the involvement of specific cytochrome P450 (P450) enzymes in biotransformation of a drug is an important step in evaluating overall disposition and victim potential for clinically-relevant drug-drug interactions.1 Table 1. Accurate mass metabolite profile for repaglinide (1 or 10 µM) incubated with NADPH-fortified human liver microsomes (0.1 or 0.5 mg/mL) for up to 30 min Figure 4. Effect of preincubation (30 min) of NADPH-fortified human liver microsomes (0.1 mg/mL) with the CYP3A4 inhibitor mibefradil (1 µM) and the CYP2C8 Current methods for biotransformation pathway identification (reaction phenotyping) rely on prior knowledge of inhibitor gemfibrozil glucuronide (100 µM) on formation of five established metabolites, biotransformation routes, and availability of metabolite reference standards or radioisotopically- Retention Time Experimental Mass shift from Proposed elemental Theoretical Mass error Identity Proposed biotransformation metabolites formed from repaglinide (10 µM) incubated for 30 min labeled drug. Synthesis of metabolite standards and radiolabeled compounds is time-consuming and expensive (min) m/z repaglinide composition m/z (ppm) a and the material is typically not available in early preclinical testing. Reaction phenotyping can be achieved by M0-OH 5.48 469.2693 +15.9940 C27H36N2O5 469.2702 -1.9 Hydroxylation 100 No inhibitor monitoring loss of the parent drug, but that approach suffers from a lack of specificity. Consequently, it is C1 5.94 451.2590 -2.0156 C27H34N2O4 451.2597 -0.2 Dehydrogenation preferable to monitor the formation of one or more metabolites to obtain a comprehensive biotransformation C2 6.83 441.2369 -12.0384 C25H32N2O5 441.2389 4.7 O-Deethylation + hydroxylation 90 a ) Mibefradil M4 7.50 469.2700 +15.9947 C27H36N2O5 469.2702 -0.4 Hydroxylation 80 map for the drug of interest. In general, this requires radiolabeled drug or metabolite reference standard % a ( M1 7.95 385.2112 -68.0641 C22H28N2O4 385.2127 -3.9 N,N-Didealkylation material, potentially adding several months to the drug development timeline before biotransformation pathway l a C H N O O-Deethylation o 70 Gemfibrozil M5 8.26 425.2436 -28.0317 25 32 2 4 425.2440 -4.5 r assignments can be made. t glucuronide Repaglinide 8.98 453.2738 -0.0015 C27H36N2O4 453.2753 -3.3 Not applicable n 60 o c C3 10.09 471.2848 +18.0095 C27H38N2O5 471.2859 -0.9 Hydroxylation + reduction f 50 High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) is a powerful tool for a priori metabolite profiling and characteriza- a o M2 10.30 485.2642 +31.9889 C27H36N2O6 485.2652 -5.1 N-Dealkylation + oxidation to the carboxylic acid e tion because complex data sets comprising information on all of the components in a sample, within a specified C4 16.09 451.2583 -2.0170 C27H34N2O4 451.2597 -3.1 Dehydrogenation g 40 2 a mass range, are acquired. HRMS data can be employed for relative quantitation of all detected components C5 17.23 451.2591 -2.0162 C27H34N2O4 451.2597 -1.3 Dehydrogenation t n 30 and have potential for derivation of earlier stage reaction phenotyping information without the need for C H N O Dehydrogenation e C6 17.52 451.2599 -2.0154 27 34 2 4 451.2597 0.4 c a r 20 metabolite reference standards. In the present study, the prandial glucose regulator repaglinide was incubated Corresponds to a metabolite previously established in the literature e with various in vitro reaction phenotyping test systems, and the samples were analyzed by HRMS metabolite P 10 profiling approaches to characterize all of the repaglinide metabolites formed. Relative amounts of each 0 individual metabolite detected in different incubation test systems were compared to establish relationships M0-OH M1 M2 M4 M5 between specific P450 enzymes and repaglinide metabolites. In the absence of metabolite reference standards, Table 2. Comparison of cytochrome P450 enzymes identified with full scan accurate mass spectrometry and relative quantitation CYP2C8 CYP3A4 Unclea r CYP2C8 CYP3A4 the abundance values were not compared across different metabolites since ionization efficiency for each as contributing to repaglinide biotransformation with enzyme involvement established with traditional methods metabolite is unknown. The approach was assessed for its suitability for rapid determination of specific biotransformation pathways for a drug in development without the additional time and cost associated with M0-OH M1 M2 M4 M5 generating radiolabeled drug or metabolite reference standards. CYP2C8, Recombinant P450 enzyme Minor contribution CYP2C8, CYP3A4 CYP3A4 CYP2C8 CYP3A4 Figure 5. Biotransformation scheme for repaglinide established with the high-resolution mass spectrometry experiment from CYP3A4 relative quantitation approach Correlation experiment with OH CYP2C8 CYP3A4 CYP3A4 CYP2C8 CYP3A4 CH O Materials and Methods human liver microsome panel 3 H3C O CH3 Chemical inhibition in human NH O CYP2C8 CYP3A4 CYP2C8, CYP3A4 CYP2C8 CYP3A4 liver microsomes N Repaglinide was purchased from Toronto Research Chemicals (Ontario, Canada). Human liver microsomes Overall conclusion CYP2C8 CYP3A4 CYP2C8, CYP3A4 CYP2C8 CYP3A4 Repaglinide (HLM; n=1 or n=200) were prepared and characterized in-house. Recombinant cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP2C8 3 CYP3A4 3,4 CYP2C8 3,4, CYP3A4 3,4 CYP2C8 3,4 co-expressed with reductase were purchased from Cypex (Dundee, Scotland). 3 Hydroxylation (CYP2C8) Literature Minor contribution Minor contribution Aldehyde Minor contribution CYP3A4 N-dealkylation (CYP3A4) O-deethylation (CYP3A4) 3 3 4 3 OH OH OH from CYP3A4 from CYP2C8 dehydrogenase from CYP3A4 OH CH3 O CH3 O CH3 O Repaglinide (1 or 10 µM) was incubated for up to 30 min (37°C; pH 7.4) with NADPH-fortified HLM (0.1 or 0.5 3 CH O Bidstrup et al (2003) 3 HO H3C O CH3 H3C O CH3 H3C OH 4 mg protein/mL; pooled or from individual donors) or recombinant enzymes, namely CYP1A2, 2B6, 2C8, 2C9, Säll et al (2012) H3C O CH3 NH O NH O NH O 2C19, 2D6, 3A4, or 2J2 (10 pmol/mL). For the inhibition experiments, pooled HLM were pre-incubated with NH O N N N mibefradil (1 µM) or gemfibrozil glucuronide (100 µM), metabolism-dependent inhibitors of CYP3A4 and NH O HO CYP2C8, respectively, for 30 min before incubation with repaglinide. Following protein precipitation with Not detected M4 M0-OH M5 acetonitrile, all samples were analyzed for metabolite profiling with reverse-phase gradient ultra-performance LC and HRMS on a Waters Synapt G2 HDMS quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometer equipped with a Waters Figure 1. Representative plots showing relative abundance changes with time for M1 formed Figure 3. Variation in formation of M0-OH (a,b), M1 (c,d), M2 (e,f), Reduction (reductases/P450) N-dealkylation (CYP3A4) OH Acquity LC (Milford, MA). An unrelated internal standard (1’-hydroxymidazolam) was employed for relative from repaglinide incubated at (a) 1 µM and (b) 10 µM and M4 formed from repaglinide M4 (g,h) and M5 (i,j) with measured CYP2C8 and OH CH O incubated at (c) 1 µM and (d) 10 µM with NADPH-fortified HLM (0.1 and 0.5 mg/mL) for CYP3A4 activity. Data correspond to repaglinide (10 µM) 3 CH3 O quantitation. H C O CH up to 30 min incubated with NADPH-fortified human liver microsomes 3 3 H3C O CH3 (0.1 mg/mL) for 20 min NH O NH O NH OH Metabolites were separated on a Waters Acquity BEH column (1.7 µm, 2.1 x 100 mm) at 50°C with 0.1% formic (a) (b) NH2 Potentially C3 M1 acid in water or acetonitrile (0.4 mL/min) using the following gradient: 10% organic held for 1 min, increased to 0.014 0.14 1.00 (a) 0.90 (b) M1 0.1 mg/mL M1 0.90 0.80 0.1 mg/mL M0-OH M0-OH Oxidation (reductases/P450) 35% at 7 min, 42% at 12 min, 73% at 20 min, and 90% at 25 min. The mass spectrometer was operated in 0.012 0.12 0.80 0.70 o o i 0.5 mg/mL i OH 0.5 mg/mL t 0.70 E t a 0.60 a r o positive, resolution elevated energy mass spectrometry (MS ) or MSMS mode with electrospray ionization. All o r 0.01 0.1 0.60 ti ti 0.50 CH3 O a E a ea 0.50 ea r r r r samples were analyzed with full scan MS . The low energy scan data were employed for quantitation. Generic a a a a 0.40 0.008 0.08 0.40 H3C O CH3 e e r r 0.30 a a 0.30 eak ionization parameters were used throughout. Fexofenadine was employed for real-time mass calibration. Data eak NH O O k k P 0.006 0.06 0.20 P a a 0.20 e processing employed MetaboLynx XS and QuanLynx subroutines of Waters MassLynx version 4.1 (Milford, MA). e 0.10 P P r = 0.967 0.10 NH OH 0.004 0.04 0.00 r = 0.569 0.00 Metabolite structural elucidation was performed manually. 0 100 200 300 400 500 M2 0.002 0.02 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 1 µM 10 µM CYP2C8 0 0 CYP3A4/5 (pmol/mg/min) (pmol/mg/min) 0 10 20 30 0 10 20 30 Time (min) Time (min) 0.08 (c) 0.09 (d) Results 0.07 M1 0.08 M1 0.07 o o 0.06 i (c) (d) i t t 0.06 a a r 0.05 r 6.00 Conclusion 0.70 0.05 ea E 0.1 mg/mL 0.04 ea r 0.1 mg/mL M4 M4 r a a 0.04 Eleven repaglinide metabolites were characterized by full scan accurate MS in the HLM incubations as 0.60 5.00 0.03 3,4 0.5 mg/mL 0.5 mg/mL 0.03 eak summarized in Table 1.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us