Celebrating the Centennial Anniversary of the Evangelical Lutheran Synod MAY–JUNE 2018 from the PRESIDENT

Celebrating the Centennial Anniversary of the Evangelical Lutheran Synod MAY–JUNE 2018 from the PRESIDENT

IT IS WRITTEN: “Stand ye in the ways...” Jeremiah 6:16 A PUBLICATION OF THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD Years COMMEMORATIVE EDITION: Celebrating the Centennial Anniversary of the Evangelical Lutheran Synod MAY–JUNE 2018 FROM THE PRESIDENT: The “Why” Behind 100 Years by REV. JOHN A. MOLDSTAD, President EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN SYNOD, Mankato, Minn. Dear Members and Friends of our ELS: ne hundred years ago in June, an organiza- tional meeting of what would become today’s Evangelical Lutheran Synod gathered at Lime Creek Lutheran Church, northeast of Lake Mills, Iowa. Relatively speaking, the group was Osmall. To an outside observer, the undertaking would not have seemed promising. “Why would people come out of a large church with hundreds of thousands of members and go through all the necessary hoops to make a new start?” Friends and relatives staying with the big synod considered it foolish. Wasn’t there too much to forfeit? The fathers who structured the ELS endured ridicule and derision. Even some pres- ent at Lime Creek might have wondered, “Where’s all this going?” Friends from the past no longer would be so friendly. Church families would be split. Didn’t the spirit of the times trend toward compromise for the sake of unity? In the general thrust for Americanization of religious culture, could the settling of past doctrinal controver- sies really be considered so crucial?… We can all agree that the weight of societal pressures can be unrelenting! ELS 100TH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE 2 Rightfully, the inception of the synod is known also as the But the precise reason God has given us the teaching of “reorganization” of the old Norwegian Synod (1953). Those election is that we might be fully certain of our salvation who still remained in the large synod and entered the since nothing – either from eternity or in time – depends on merger (NLCA of 1917) hurled their objections at the thirteen the disposition of our own sinful hearts, but only on God’s pastors, particularly over the name originally chosen: Nor- freely choosing us purely by his mercy. As we say in our ELS wegian Synod of the American Evangelical Lutheran Church. Catechism, “God has chosen me to be saved, not because They insisted that only the large body with its synod-owned of anything in me, but only because of His grace and mercy properties was entitled to use the “Norwegian Synod” label. in Christ” (2001 edition, #230). By faith in our Savior Jesus Christ, God wants us to know without a doubt that we are of Writing almost a decade later, the Rev. Christian Anderson the elect and will enjoy life eternal with Him. fittingly addressed this unfounded objection. In his 1927 presidential address to the reorganized synod, he observed: It is terribly unfortunate that the error, which had crept into “But the essential things in a Christian church body are really the old Norwegian Synod and was presumed dealt with by not its outward organization, its educational or charitable the exodus of a third of the church body in 1887, popped institutions, or its buildings of wood and stone. Much rather up again in 1910 and the years following. A 1912 document must it be its confession of faith, the principles which are known as Opgjor (“Settlement”) had been prepared in an at- followed in doctrine and practice, and the spirit in which tempt to bring together all sides on the old election debate. it works and builds. In these respects we claim to be the The purpose of this was the formation of one large church logical heirs of the old Norwegian Synod” (translation by J. among all Norwegian Lutherans. This came to fruition in 1917 H. Larson). under the name of “Norwegian Lutheran Church of America.” Here we have the answer to the Why question. It was a The pastors who formed today’s ELS correctly saw how matter of doctrine. It was a matter of staying with the true the election error from the 1880s had not been put to rest. confession of faith, which, by God’s grace, was the very Instead, the compromising document placed both views of foundation of the old Norwegian Synod under leaders such predestination on the same plane without any reservation: as Revs. H. A. Preus, J. A. Ottensen, and U.V. Koren. The rea- on the one hand, election by grace alone; on the other, elec- son for organizing, the reason for sacrificing friendships, the tion “in view of faith.” The ambiguous document also spoke reason for stomaching the ridicule, the reason for investing of a “feeling of responsibility” by natural man (i.e., man who their own precious time and limited financial resources went is sinful from birth and therefore opposed to God) to accept much deeper than a love for synodical heritage. It involved grace for salvation. Here we note how also the teaching of the heritage of God’s Word. It meant seeing the overriding conversion was being perverted. We sinners cannot by our need to stress God’s grace alone in every aspect of a sin- own reason or strength or “feeling of responsibility” bring ner’s salvation. It meant abiding strictly with what Scripture ourselves to faith in Christ. Only the Holy Spirit can do this as teaches, as expounded also in the Lutheran Confessions, he works in our hearts through His Means of Grace (cf. the without reliance on human reason or questionable com- Third Article of the Apostle’s Creed). ments by certain earlier church fathers. Anybody not willing to examine carefully the issue(s) in- For a minority of pastors and the men and women of their volved would have questioned the sanity of the ELS orig- parishes who gathered at Lime Creek, a biblical issue resur- inators at Lime Creek. At the time of the merger in 1917, faced that imperiled sound teaching and the consolation of the large Norwegian Synod had 986 congregations with souls. In the late 1800s, a doctrinal controversy had shaken 150,550 souls served by 351 pastors. The reorganized mi- the Norwegian Synod. It centered on the doctrine of election nority, while gaining a number of pastors and congregations or predestination, but also impacted other teachings, such in the years following, counted in the year of 1920 a total of as conversion and justification. 30 pastors and 20 congregations. But it is not the numbers that tell the story. Profound love for the truth of God’s holy The Bible teaches clearly that only God’s grace in Christ and Word does. And sincere concern for the souls under that nothing within any of us sinners contributes toward influenc- Word does. ing God to choose us for salvation (Ephesians 1:4-6; John 15:16). Yet some theologians held to the position that God The Why question was forcefully answered at that minority elected certain ones for salvation “in view of faith” (intuitu meeting near the Iowa-Minnesota border. The first issue of fidei); that is, they taught that God from eternity foresaw a Luthersk Tidende, dated a year earlier (July 16, 1917), con- persevering quality of faith in people as the reason he chose tained this simple announcement, shared here with em- them to have eternal salvation. A false understanding of a phasis: “Pastors and member congregations who desire to phrase in Romans 8:29 (“…those whom he foreknew”) was continue in the old doctrine and practice of the Norwegian used to imply that more than God’s grace alone was behind Synod will, God willing, hold their annual meeting in the Lime his eternal election decree. Creek Congregation, Pastor Henry Ingebritson’s charge, June 14 [1918] and following days.” Lord, keep us steadfast in Thy Word. 3 MAY–JUNE 2018 THE LUTHERAN SENTINEL IN THIS ISSUE: THE LUTHERAN SENTINEL 6 Pivotal Points & 16 The Lutheran Sentinel: 28 Tending the Tender Pivotal Persons Origin, History, Future REV. BERNT TWEIT REV. CRAIG A. FERKENSTAD REV. THEODORE G. GULLIXSON YOUNG BRANCHES: 8 “An Absolute Necessity” 18 The U.S. Map of the ELS 30 Questioning History PROF. ERLING TEIGEN REV. CRAIG A. FERKENSTAD Q&A with: MRS. REBECCA DeGARMEAUX 10 Preparing New 20 The Gospel for the Shepherds for Old Paths Eunuch Next Door 32 Excercising a Heritage REV. GAYLIN R. SCHMELING REV. LARRY WENTZLAFF Handoff REV. PETER FAUGSTAD 12 The ELS and its Place on 22 To the Ends of the Earth the American Lutheran REV. WAYNE HALVORSON 34 Looking Back into Our Landscape Future REV. DAVID JAY WEBBER 24 Looming Large: REV. KYLE MADSON The Pivotal Place of Laity 14 A Worldwide Confession MR. NORMAN WERNER BIOGRAPHY BRIEFS REV. GAYLIN R. SCHMELING 36 The ELS of 1918: 26 O Rejoice, Ye Christians, Harstad, Hansen, Loudly Ingebritsen REV. THEODORE G. GULLIXSON DEPARTMENTS: 2 From the President 5 Pastor, I Have a Question Evangelical THE LUTHERAN SENTINEL / MAY-JUNE 2018 / VOLUME 101 / NUMBER 3 / ISSN OO24-7510 Lutheran Synod PUBLISHED BY: The Lutheran Sentinel is the official publication of theEvangelical Lutheran Synod and is The Evangelical Lutheran Synod 6 Browns Court published six times per year. The subscription price is $12.00 per year with reduced rates Mankato, MN 56001 available for blanket subscriptions at $10.00 through a member congregation. ADDRESS EDITORIAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: Rev. Paul Fries 6 Browns Court STAFF: Mankato, MN 56001 ADDRESS CIRCULATION CORRESPONDENCE Rev. Kyle Madson Editor and ADDRESS CORRECTIONS TO: Rev. Paul Fries ELS Communication Director Lutheran Sentinel Rev. Charles Keeler Contributing Editor 6 Browns Court Mankato, MN 56001 Denise Luehmann Subscription Manager Jessie Fries Proofreader PERIODICAL POSTPAID AT MANKATO, MN 56001 Ryan Madson Layout & Design and ADDITIONAL OFFICES.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    36 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us