New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles Igor G. Irastorza1,2 and Javier Redondo1,3 1Departamento de F´ısicaTe´orica,Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain 2Laboratorio Subterr´aneode Canfranc, 22880 Canfranc Estaci´on,Spain 3Max-Planck-Institut f¨urPhysik, 80805 M¨unchen, Germany May 8, 2018 Abstract Axions and other very light axion-like particles appear in many extensions of the Standard Model, and are leading candidates to compose part or all of the missing matter of the Universe. They also appear in models of inflation, dark radiation, or even dark energy, and could solve some long-standing astrophysical anomalies. The physics case of these particles has been considerably developed in recent years, and there are now useful guidelines and powerful motivations to attempt experimental detection. Admittedly, the lack of a positive signal of new physics at the high energy frontier, and in underground detectors searching for weakly interacting massive particles, is also contributing to the increase of interest in axion searches. The experimental landscape is rapidly evolving, with many novel detection concepts and new experimental proposals. An updated account of those initiatives is lacking in the literature. In this review we attempt to provide such an update. We will focus on the new experimental approaches and their complementarity, but will also review the most relevant recent results from the consolidated strategies and the prospects of new generation experiments under consideration in the field. We will also briefly review the latest developments of the theory, cosmology and astrophysics of axions and we will discuss the prospects to probe a large fraction of relevant parameter space in the coming decade. arXiv:1801.08127v2 [hep-ph] 7 May 2018 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Theoretical motivation to search for axions 7 2.1 The strong CP problem and axions . 7 2.1.1 Main axion properties . 9 2.1.2 Axion models . 10 2.1.3 Axion couplings and the generalisation to ALPs . 14 2.2 Beyond the QCD axion, ALPs and other WISPs . 16 3 Axion cosmology and astrophysics: constraints and hints 17 3.1 Axions and ALPs in cosmology . 19 3.1.1 Cold dark matter . 21 3.1.2 Hot dark matter and dark radiation . 26 3.1.3 ALPs and inflation . 29 3.2 Astrophysics . 29 3.2.1 Black holes . 30 3.2.2 Effects on photon propagation . 31 4 Sources of axions and their detection 32 4.1 Natural sources . 33 4.2 Producing ALPs in the lab . 36 4.2.1 Axions from photons (two-photon gaγ coupling) . 37 4.2.2 ALP fields from macroscopic bodies (fermionic couplings ga ; g¯a )........ 40 4.2.3 ALP forces . 41 4.3 Coherent ALP detection . 42 4.4 Overview . 43 5 Search for ALPs in the laboratory 44 5.1 Light-shining-through wall experiments . 45 5.2 Polarization experiments . 48 5.3 5th force experiments . 50 6 Detection of solar axions 53 6.1 Axion helioscopes . 53 6.2 Other techniques to search for solar axions . 58 6.2.1 Primakoff-Bragg conversion in crystalline detectors . 58 6.2.2 Modulation helioscope . 59 6.2.3 Non-Primakoff conversions . 60 6.3 Axions from supernovae . 60 7 Direct detection of dark matter axions 61 7.1 Conventional haloscopes . 63 7.1.1 Lower ma ...................................... 65 7.1.2 Higher ma ...................................... 66 7.2 Dish antenna and dielectric haloscopes . 72 7.2.1 Dish Antenna . 72 7.2.2 Dielectric haloscope . 75 7.3 Low frequency resonators with LC circuits . 77 2 7.4 NMR techniques . 79 7.4.1 Oscillating EDMs . 79 7.4.2 DM ALP \wind" . 81 7.5 Atomic transitions . 82 7.6 Non homogeneous DM phase-space distribution . 83 7.6.1 Directional detection and low dispersion streams . 83 7.6.2 A global detector network for axion miniclusters and topological defects . 84 8 Discussion 85 9 Conclusions 86 3 1 Introduction The 20th century witnessed a spectacular revolution in our understanding of the fundamental laws of nature, that culminated with the establishment of the Standard Model (SM) of particle physics, the theory that describes with accuracy (at least as far as our experimental and computational accuracy goes) the results of every experiment performed so far in particle physics. There are however many reasons to believe the SM is not an ultimate theory of nature. Some decades ago it could have been argued that the SM does not include the gravitational interactions {so successfully described at the classical level by Einstein's theory of general relativity{ and so it has to be extended or embedded in a more complete theory. Nowadays we can count on a few other striking observations. Perhaps the most pressing come from cosmology, which seems to be also extremely well described by a classical solution of Einstein's gravity equations, a homogeneously expanding Universe with some primordial inhomogeneities seeded by tiny quantum fluctuations during an exponential expansion phase, so-called primordial inflation. And this excellent description requires a few ingredients that are nowhere to be found in the SM: Dark Matter (DM) {a substance that behaves under gravity as cold gas of non-baryonic weakly interacting particles, Dark Energy (DE), which gravitates as Einstein's famous cosmological constant, and at least a new field (not necessarily a fundamental field) whose potential energy drives inflation for some time and then transforms somehow into the radiation that will dominate the energy density of the Universe during Big Bang Nucleosynthesis. Amongst these three, the evidence for Cold DM is the most precious for particle physics as it is directly attributable to the existence of new species of particles, i.e. it has been convincingly proven that the majority of DM is not in the form of neutrinos or any other SM particle. But the SM itself also provides compelling reasons to seek a more fundamental theory of nature. Most of them follow the same pattern: the lack of symmetry of the SM will be alleviated as we consider physics at higher energy scales. New particles/fields are expected to appear and restore symmetries that are not altogether evident in the SM. Couplings can be all related at high energies and still lose this unified character at low energies because they run with the energy scale. Electroweak and strong interactions could be two aspects of the same Grand Unified Theory (GUT) at a very high energy scale of 1015 GeV where quarks and leptons would also be different ingredients of the same multicomponent fundamental field. Other ideas consider the unification of the fermion generations into the framework of family symmetries. Finally, theories beyond the framework of quantum field theory have to be invoked to include gravity at the same quantum footing than the rest of known interactions. The most conspicuous framework in which this appears to be possible, at least in principle, is the framework of string theories in 10 dimensions. Another avenue of speculation about possible extensions of the SM is concerned with the hierarchy problem and the concept of naturalness. A very well motivated scenario predicts the existence of a \supersymmetry" (SUSY) in nature between fermions and bosons. In addition of solving the hierarchy problem, SUSY partners contribute to the running of SM gauge couplings, providing a strong hint for GUTs. SUSY is also widely present in string theories. In addition, SUSY theories usually predict a stable weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP), typically the lightest SUSY particle (LSP). In a rather generic way, the expected relic density of LSPs thermally produced after the Big Bang falls in same ballpark as the observed DM density. This has been called the WIMP miracle, and has constituted a major motivation to invest large efforts to search for SUSY and WIMPs as DM candidates for the last few decades. Unfortunately, experiments at the Large Hadron Collider have not yet found any convincing signature of SUSY or any other new physics at the TeV scale and the many underground experiments searching for WIMP-nuclear recoils have borne any unambiguous signal either. Besides, cosmic rays from DM-DM annihilation (at the core of the WIMP miracle) above the accountable astrophysical backgrounds, have not yet been found. We have a very strong prejudice towards nature accommodating more particles/fields and more 4 symmetries at high energy scales. If this new physics is well above the electroweak scale, there is little hope to directly reach the needed energy scale at future accelerators. However, there are mechanisms by which physics associated with high energy scales have important measurable consequences at very low energy. There are well known examples of this. Gravity is associated with physics at the Planck scale and has very appreciable effects at low energies (thanks to the graviton being massless and its effects coherently summed up over a large amount of particles). Another example is the neutrino, whose properties are better studied not by producing the highest energies possible, but the highest luminosities and the most controlled environments for their experimental detection. Neutrinos offer more analogies with the topic of this review, regarding e.g. their role in astrophysics and cosmology. Let us mention that the smallness of the graviton and neutrino masses compared with the electroweak scale does not pose another hierarchy problem because quantum corrections to their mass are protected by symmetries. This inspires us to think about low mass particles associated with symmetries present at high energies and their effects in cosmology, in astrophysics, and in experiments at the high intensity, precision frontier. A discipline with its own taste sometimes called the low energy frontier of particle physics [1].