Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification: Rainer Forst in Dialogue

Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification: Rainer Forst in Dialogue

"Bibliography." Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification: Rainer Forst in Dialogue. Ed. Rainer Forst. : Bloomsbury Academic, 2014. 217–230. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 24 Sep. 2021. <>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 24 September 2021, 00:06 UTC. Copyright © Rainer Forst and contributors, 2014. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. Bibliography Abizadeh, A. (2008), ‘Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control your Own Borders’, Political Theory 36(1): 37–65. —(2010), ‘Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller’, Political Theory 38(1): 121–30. Allen, A. (1999), The Power of Feminist Theory: Domination, Resistance, Solidarity. Boulder: Westview. —(2008), The Politics of Our Selves: Power, Autonomy, and Gender in Contemporary Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press. —(2013), ‘The Unforced Force of the Better Argument: Reason and Power in Habermas’ Political Theory’, Constellations 19(3): 353–68, September 2012. Allen, A., R. Forst, and M. Haugaard (forthcoming), ‘Power, Reason, Justice, Domination: A Dialogue between Amy Allen, Rainer Forst and Mark Haugaard’, Journal of Power. Allen, D. (2004), Talking to Strangers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Anderson, E. (1999), ‘What Is the Point of Equality?’, Ethics 109(2): 287–337. Aniskiewicz, A. S. (1979), ‘Autonomic Components of Vicarious Conditioning and Psychopathy’, Journal of Clinical Psychology 35: 60–7. Archibugi, D. (1998), ‘Principles of Cosmopolitan Democracy’, in D. Archibugi, D. Held and M. Köhler (eds), Re-imagining Political Community: Studies in Cosmopolitan Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press. Arneson, R. (2001), ‘Luck and Equality’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society supp. vol: 73–90. —(2004), ‘Luck Egalitarianism: An Interpretation and Defense’, Philosophical Topics 32(1/2): 1–20. —(2011), ‘Luck Egalitarianism – A Primer’, in C. l. Knight and Z. Stemplowska (eds), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Arrhenius, G. (2005), ‘The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory’, in F. Tersman (ed.), Democracy Unbound. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press. Avant, D. D., M. Finnemore, and S. K. Sell (eds) (2010), Who Governs the Globe?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 218 Bibliography Ayers, A. J. (1952), Language, Truth, and Logic, 2nd edition. New York: Dover. Azmanova, A. (2012), The Scandal of Reason: Toward a Critical Theory of Political Judgment. New York: Columbia University Press. Bagnoli, C. ‘Constructivism in Metaethics’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, published 27 September 2011 at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ constructivism-metaethics/, accessed 19 January 2012. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995), Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Baron-Cohen, S. and S. Wheelwright (2004), ‘The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences’, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34: 163–75. Baron-Cohen, S., A. M. Leslie, and U. Frith (1985), ‘Does the Autistic Child Have a “Theory of Mind”?’, Cognition 21: 37–46. Barry, B. (1989), Theories of Justice: A Treatise on Social Justice, Volume I. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Beckman, L. (2009), The Frontiers of Democracy: The Right to Vote and Its Limits. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. —(2012), ‘Is Residence Special? Democracy in the Age of Migration and Human Mobility’, in L. Beckman and E. Erman (eds), Territories of Citizenship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Beitz, C. (1983), ‘Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Sentiment’, Journal of Philosophy 80(10): 591–600. —(1989), Political Equality. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Benhabib, S. (1992), Situating the Self. Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge. —(1997), ‘On Reconciliation and Respect, Justice and the Good Life: Response to Herta Nagl-Docekal and Rainer Forst’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 23: 97–114. —(2004), The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bergström, L. (2007), ‘Democracy and Political Boundaries’, in F. Tersman (ed.), The Viability and Desirability of Global Democracy. Stockholm: Stockholm University. Bibliography 219 Berlin, I. (1981), Concepts and Categories. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Blair, R. (2005), ‘Responding to the Emotions of Others: Dissociating Forms of Empathy through the Study of Typical and Psychiatric Populations’, Consciousness and Cognition 14: 698–718. Blair, R., L. Jones, F. Clark, and M. Smith (1995), ‘Is the Psychopath “Morally I n s a n e” ? ’, Personality and Individual Differences 19: 741–52. —(1997), ‘The Psychopathic Individual: A Lack of Responsiveness to Distress Cues?’, Psychophysiology 34: 192–8. Boltanski, L. and L. Thévenot (2006), On Justification, trans. by C. Porter. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. —(1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. by R. Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. —(1988), Homo Academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press. —(1991a), ‘Distinction Revisited: Introduction to an East German Reading’, Poetics Today 12(4): 639–41. —(1991b), ‘Social Space and Symbolic Space: Introduction to a Japanese Reading of Distinction’, Poetics Today 12(4): 627–38. —(1991c), Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. —(1998), Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity. —(2000), Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Brandom, R. (1994), Making it Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. —(1999), ‘Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel’s Idealism’, European Journal of Philosophy 7(2): 164–89. Brighouse, H. and A. Swift (2006), ‘Equality, Priority, and Positional Goods’, Ethics 116: 471–97. Brighouse, H. and I. Robeyns (eds) (2010), Measuring Justice: Primary Goods and Capabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Caney, S. (2001), ‘Cosmopolitan Justice and Equalizing Opportunities’, Metaphilosophy 32(1/2): 113–34. —(2005), Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 220 Bibliography —(2007), ‘Global Poverty and Human Rights: The Case for Positive Duties’, in T. Pogge (ed.), Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right: Who Owes What to the Very Poor? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 275–302. —(2011), ‘Humanity, Associations and Global Justice: In Defence of Humanity- Centred Cosmopolitan Egalitarianism’, The Monist 94(4): 506–34. Carens, J. (2009), ‘Fear vs. Fairness: Migration, Citizenship and the Transformation of Political Community’, in K. Lippert-Rasmussen, N. Holtug, and S. Laegaard (eds), Nationalism and Multiculturalism in a World of Immigration. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. —(2010), ‘Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders’, in R. Bellamy and A. Palumbo (eds), Citizenship. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. Christiano, T. (2006), ‘A Democratic Theory of Territory and Some Puzzles about Global Democracy’, Journal of Social Philosophy 37(1): 81–107. —(2009), ‘Debate: Estlund on Democratic Authority’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 17(2): 228–40. Cohen, G. A. (1993), ‘Equality of What: On Welfare, Goods and Capabilities’, in M. Nussbaum and A. Sen (eds), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. —(1997), ‘Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 26(1): 3–30. —(2003), ‘Facts and Principles’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 31(3): 211–45. —(2008), Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. —(2011), On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice and Other Essays in Political Philosophy, ed. by M. Otsuka. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Cohen, J. (1989), ‘Democratic Equality’, Ethics 99(4): 727–51. Collier, P. (2007), The Bottom Billion: Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can be Done About It. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cook, C. (ed.) (1994), Constitutional Predicament. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Crisp, R. (2003), ‘Equality, Priority, and Compassion’, Ethics 113(4): 745–63. Curtis, D. E. and J. Resnik (1987), ‘Images of Justice’, Yale Law Journal 96: 1727–72. Dahl, R. (1989), Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press. Dworkin, R. (2000), Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bibliography 221 —(2003), ‘Equality, Luck and Hierarchy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 31(2): 190–8. Enoch, D. (2006), ‘Agency, Shmagency: Why Normativity Won’t Come from What Is Constitutive of Action’, The Philosophical Review 115: 169–98. Erman, E. (2005), Human Rights and Democracy: Discourse Theory and Global Rights Institutions. Aldershot: Ashgate. —(2007), ‘Conflict and Universal Moral Theory: From Reasonableness to Reason-Giving’, Political Theory 35(5): 598–623. —(2011), ‘Human Rights Do not Make Global Democracy’, Contemporary Political Theory 10(4): 463–81. —(2012), ‘ “The Right to have Rights” to the Rescue: From Human Rights to Global Democracy’, in M. Goodale (ed.), Human Rights at the Crossroads. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 72–83. —(2013), ‘In Search for Democratic Agency in Deliberative Governance’, European Journal of International Relations

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us