Phylogenetic Patterns in the Trochilidae

Phylogenetic Patterns in the Trochilidae

The Auk 115(1):105-118, 1998 PHYLOGENETIC PATTERNS IN THE TROCHILIDAE JOHN A. GERWIN•'2 AND ROBERTM. ZINK L3 •Museumof NaturalScience and Department of Zoologyand Physiology, LouisianaState University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA ABSTRACT.--Althoughmany aspectsof hummingbirdbiology have been studied, few re- centanalyses of higher-levelsystematic relationships exist. Based on morphology, it hasbeen hypothesizedthat the Trochilidaeincludes six majorclades. We used starch-gel electropho- resisto constructand testphylogenetic hypotheses for representativesof the six clades,us- ing two speciesof swifts(Apodidae) as outgroups. Of 45 loci scored,38 werepolymorphic. The averageNei's geneticdistance (D) among14 hummingbirdtaxa was 0.625;D averaged 1.61between the swiftsand hummingbirds.These distances are large,and are consistent with othernonpasserine groups, suggesting that hummingbird taxa are relativelyold. Phy- logeneticanalyses generally were consistentwith the hypothesisthat hermitsare a sister groupto all othertrochilines. Within the Trochilinae, two broad groups are recognized, here calledtrochiline-A and B, whichcorrespond to the morphologicallydetermined "primitive" and"advanced" trochiline groups of Zusiand Bentz (1982). Androdon aequatorialis is genet- ically distinctbut generallyaligns with the trochiline-Agroup. Within the trochiline-B group,four radiationshypothesized by Zusi (pers.comm.), here called Bee, Amazilia ("Em- eralds"),Andean, and High Andean,were corroboratedby our analyses.Our distanceanal- ysissuggests a phylogeneticpattern consistent with that derivedfrom Sibley and Ahlquists' (1990)and Bleiweisset al.'s(1997) DNA-DNA hybridizationstudies. Received 31 October1996, accepted20 June1997. THE HUMMINGBIRDS(TROCHILIDAE) form one DNA-DNA hybridization(Sibley and Ahlquist of thelargest bird families, with approximately 1990;Bleiweiss et al. 1994,1997). Most of these 325 species.Although many aspectsof hum- studieswere not comprehensiveat the levelof mingbirdbiology have been studied, few high- the family.However, the studyby Bleiweisset er-levelstudies of systematicrelationships ex- al. (1997),which involved 26 species,provided ist. Early taxonomists(Gould 1861, Boucard a molecularphylogenetic hypothesis for the 1895, Simon 1921, Peters 1945, Zimmer 1950- majorclades in the family.We report an allo- 1953) providedspecies descriptions and gen- zymic surveyof major groupsof humming- eraldetails of geographicvariation in mostspe- birdsdesigned to testphylogenetic hypotheses cies,but they did not explicitlyidentify system- derived from previous morphologicaland aticrelationships. Recently, several approaches DNA-DNA hybridizationanalyses. havebeen used to identifyphylogenetic pat- Our study was based in part on Zusi and ternswithin parts of this family: comparative Bentz's (1982) hypothesis of higher-level analysisof vocalizationsand matingbehavior groupsin the Trochilidae.They identified four (Schuchmannunpubl. data), external morphol- major groupings:hermits (Phaethorninae), ogy and ecology (Graves 1980, 1986; Stiles "primitive"trochilines, and two groupsof "ad- 1983, 1996; Hinklemann 1989), comparative vanced" trochilines.The terms primitive and myology (Zusi and Bentz 1982), protein elec- advanced are reserved for discussion of char- trophoresis(Gerwin and Zink 1989, Gill and actersand are misleadingwithout an in-depth Gerwin 1989), mitochondrialDNA sequences phylogeneticanalysis; we refer to the two (Hernandez-Banoset al. unpubl. data), and groupsas trochiline-A (Zusi and Bentz's [1982] primitive group) and trochiline-B(their ad- 2 Present address: North Carolina State Museum of vancedgroup). The widespread notion that the NaturalSciences, P.O. Box 29555, Raleigh, North Car- hermitsrepresent the "primitive" humming- olina 27626,USA. E-mail:[email protected] birds is incorrect in one sense: if these are sister 3Address correspondence to this author.Present address:James Ford Bell Museum, University of clades,each is by definitionthe sameage. Phy- Minnesota, 100 Ecology Building, St. Paul, Minne- logeneticanalysis is requiredto showthat the sota 55108, USA. E-mail: [email protected] hermitclade retains a disproportionatenumber 105 106 GERWINAND ZINK [Auk, Vol. 115 of plesiomorphiccharacters relative to the sis- (1997)refer to the Beegroup and the hermits.Blei- ter group of hummingbirdsbefore it would be weiss et al. (1997) further referred to a Mountain "primitive" in any sense.Also, within trochi- Gemgroup, of whichwe had no representatives.For lines,if thereare onlytwo groups,neither can simplicity,we useZusi's names, except for usingEm- erald in place Amazilia, becauseconfusion results be primitive in a phylogenetictree. From his fromnaming a groupafter one of thegenera in it. We work on comparativemyology, using the swifts includedtwo speciesof swifts (Apodidae;Reinarda (Apodidae) as the outgroup, Zusi (pers. squamata,Chaetura cinereiventris) that servedas out- comm.)suggested as a workinghypothesis: (1) groups(see Appendix 1). Althoughinferences based that the trochiline-Agroup included Androdon, on low numbersof specimenshave been criticized Schistes,Colibri, Doryfera,and close relatives; (Archieet al. 1989),in our study geneticdistances and (2) that four major cladesexist within the weresufficiently high that our patterns likely are ro- trochiline-Bgroup: Bee, High Andean,Andean, bust to small samplesizes of individuals.Most spec- and Amazilia ("Emeralds").By selectingat imens were collectedover severalyears during ex- leasttwo representativesof eachmajor group peditionsto variousregions of the Neotropics.Sam- ples of tissueswere preservedin liquid nitrogenin to reflect hummingbird diversity,our phylo- the field until transferred to the Louisiana State Uni- geneticanalysis of allozymevariation provides versity Museum of Natural Sciences(LSUMNS), a higher-levelphylogenetic hypothesis that can wherethey were storedat -70øC (seeJohnson et al. be comparedwith thosegenerated from other [1984] for details of collection and preservation data sets. methods).Voucher specimens (study skinsand tis- Most modern molecularstudies of phyloge- suesamples) are housedat the LSUMNS. ny rely on DNA sequences(Hillis et al. 1996). Samplesof pectoraland heart muscleand liver (to- However,phylogenetic hypotheses based on al- tal volumeof tissuewas approximately0.5 cc)were lozymesand mitochondrialDNA oftenare to- placedin 0.8 mL of grinding buffer consistingof 10 pologically consistent(Zink and Avise 1990, rng NADP and 100 }xLof 2-mercaptoethanolin 100 Zink and Dittmann 1991, Zink et al. 1991, Zink mL distilled water (Richardsonet al. 1986) and ground for 10 to 15 s using a Tekmar Tissuemizer. and Blackwell1996). Thus, althoughthere are Thesecrude homogenates were then centrifugedat reasonsfor preferringDNA data for phyloge- 36,000 x g for 30 min, and the supernatantwas netic inferences(Hillis et al. 1996), allozyme- storedat -70øC.Six aliquots of 20 }xLof eachsample basedphylogenetic inferences are valuablein werestored separately and usedfor the first sixgels, studies of congruenceof tree topologiesin- and the rest of the homogenatewas storedin indi- ferred from different data sets(Swofford et al. vidual vials. Electrophoreticprocedures followed 1996).In our study,we comparetree topologies Selanderet al. (1971),Harris and Hopkinson(1976), from allozymes and DNA-DNA hybridization Johnsonet al. (1984) and Richardsonet al. (1986) (Bleiweisset al. 1997).Although both are based with slight modifications(available from author). on informationfrom the nucleargenome, each Variousgel-buffer combinations were used to opti- mize the resolutionof bandingpatterns (Appendix is likely an independentestimate of phyloge- 2). netic relationships.Hence, congruence of tree Forty-five presumptivegenetic loci were scored topologiescan be used as a measureof confi- (Table1), with allelescoded in referenceto their mo- dencein the phylogenetichypothesis. bility from the origin.The most cathodal alleles were coded"a,"with subsequentlyfaster alleles coded as MATERIALS AND METHODS "b," "c," and so on. Multiple isozymesat a locus were alsocoded by mobility.The mostanodally ap- We used standardhorizontal starch-gel electro- pearingisozymes were codedas "1," with the more phoresisto investigatepatterns of geneticvariation cathodalisozymes coded as "2," "3," and so on. Ac- among 14 taxa (Zusi pers. comm.):Glaucis and Phae- ronymsfor loci follow Harris and Hopkinson(1976). thornisrepresent the hermit, or phaethornineline; We enteredindividual genotypes into the computer Androdon,Colibri, Schistes, and Doryferathe trochi- program BIOSYS-1 (Swofford and Selander 1981), line-A group; Acestruraand Selasphorusthe "Bee" which produceda table of allelic frequencies,Nei's line; Amazilia and Campylopterusthe "Amazilia" (1972, 1978) and Rogers' (1972) geneticdistances, (Emerald) group; Aglaeactisand Coeligenathe "An- Cavalli-Sforzaand Edwards' (1967) chord distance, dean" clade; and Metallura, and Oreotrochilusthe and four UPGMA phenograms(Sheath and Sokal "high Andean"clade. Bleiweiss et al. (1997)renamed 1973) derived using thesefour distancemeasures. these clades Mangoes (Trochiline-A), Emeralds Becausethere is no consensuson tree-buildingmeth- (Amazilia group), Brilliants (Andean), and Co- ods, we usedboth distanceand discrete-locusap- quettes(high Andean);both Zusi and Bleiweisset al. proachesand comparedresults. Distance-Wagner January1998] TrochilidaePhylogeny 107 TABLE1. Allelicfrequencies for variableloci. Numbers in parenthesesare frequencies

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us