On the Schur, Positive Schur and Weak Dunford-Pettis Properties in Fr

On the Schur, Positive Schur and Weak Dunford-Pettis Properties in Fr

On the Schur, positive Schur and weak Dunford-Pettis properties in Fr´echet lattices Geraldo Botelho∗ and Jos´eLucas P. Luiz† Abstract We prove some general results on sequential convergence in Fr´echet lattices that yield, as particular instances, the following results regarding a closed ideal I of a Banach lattice E: (i) If two of the lattices E, I and E/I have the positive Schur property (the Schur property, respectively) then the third lattice has the positive Schur property (the Schur property, respectively) as well; (ii) If I and E/I have the dual positive Schur property, then E also has this property; (iii) If I has the weak Dunford-Pettis property and E/I has the positive Schur property, then E has the weak Dunford-Pettis property. Examples and applications are provided. 1 Introduction In the realm of Banach spaces, the Schur property (weakly null sequences are norm null) is a 3-space property in the weak sense that a Banach space E has the Schur property whenever a closed subspace F of E and the quotient space E/F have the Schur property (see, e.g., [8]). But it is not a 3-space property in the strong sense that, given a closed subspace F of the Banach space E, if two of the spaces E, F and E/F have the Schur property, then the third one also has this property. To see that, just remember that c0 is a quotient of ℓ1. In the setting of Banach lattices, for the quotient E/F of a Banach lattice E over a closed subspace F to be a Banach lattice, F should be an ideal of E (see, e.g., [3]). So arXiv:1909.09514v1 [math.FA] 20 Sep 2019 the natural transposition of the concept of 3-space property (in the strong sense) to the realm of Banach lattices reads as follows. Definition 1.1. A property P of Banach lattices is a 3-lattice property if the following holds: given a closed ideal I of the Banach lattice E, if two of the lattices E, I and E/I have P, the the third one has P as well. ∗Supported by CNPq Grant 304262/2018-8 and Fapemig Grant PPM-00450-17. †Supported by a CNPq scholarship 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 46A40, 46B42, 46A04. Keywords: Banach lattices, Fr´echet lattices, Schur and positive Schur properties, dual positive Schur property, weak Dunford-Pettis property. 1 A Banach lattice has the positive Schur property if weakly null sequences formed by positive vectors are norm null. A lot of research has been done on this property, for some recent contributions see, e.g., [6, 7, 13, 18, 25, 26, 27, 29]. Among other results, in this paper we prove that, contrary to the case of the Schur property for Banach spaces, the Schur and the positive Schur properties are 3-lattice properties. These results will appear as applications of general results on the Schur and the positive Schur properties in Fr´echet lattices. Definition 1.2. Given linear topologies τ1 and τ2 in a Riesz space E, we say that: • E has the (τ1, τ2)-Schur property (in short, (τ1, τ2)-SP) if τ1-null sequences in E are τ2-null. • E has the (τ1, τ2)-positive Schur property (in short, (τ1, τ2)-PSP) if τ1-null sequences in E formed by positive elements are τ2-null. Of course, the Schur property is the (weak topology, norm topology)-SP and the posi- tive Schur property is the (weak topology, norm topology)-PSP in a Banach lattice. Part (a) of the definition above is similar to the approach of Castillo and Sim˜oes to the Schur property (see [9, Definition 4, Definition 5, Remark 5]). After proving some general results on the (τ1, τ2)-SP and the (τ1, τ2)-PSP (see Theorems 2.1 and 2.3), we conclude in Corollary 2.4 that the Schur and the positive Schur properties are 3-lattices properties in the context of σ-Dedekind complete Fr´echet lattices. Applying these results for Banach lattices we get, in Theorem 2.5, that the Schur and the positive Schur properties are 3-lattice properties, and in Proposition 2.12 that a Banach lattice E has the dual positive Schur property whenever a closed ideal I and the quotient lattice E/I have this property. A few more applications to Banach lattices and an illustrative example are also provided. In a short final section we show that the methods we use for Fr´echet lattices can also be helpful in the study of the weak Dunford-Pettis property in Banach lattices (cf. Theorem 3.2 and Corollary 3.3). For the basic theory of Banach lattices, Riesz spaces and linear topologies on Riesz spaces we refer [1, 2, 3, 17] 2 The Schur and the positive Schur properties According to [2], a Fr´echet lattice is a Riesz space endowed with a locally convex-solid (hence linear), metrizable and complete topology. We just recall that a locally convex topology on a Riesz space E is locally convex-solid if it is generated by a family of Riesz seminorms, or, equivalently, if the origin has a basis of neighborhoods formed by convex and solid sets (see [3, Section 3.3]). If F is a Riesz subspace of the Risez space E endowed with the linear topologies τ1 and τ2, we consider in F the corresponding relative topologies, still denoted by τ1 and τ2. So, if E has the (τ1, τ2)-SP ((τ1, τ2)-PSP, respectively), then F has the (τ1, τ2)-SP ((τ1, τ2)-PSP, respectively) as well. Given a subspace M of a topological vector space (X, τ), byτ ˙ we denote the quotient topology on X/M, which is the finest topology on X/M making the quotient operator π : X −→ X/M continuous. It is well known thatτ ˙ is a linear topology on X/M (see, e.g., [23, I.2.2]). 2 Given an ideal I of the Riesz space E, the order in E/I is given by:x ˙ ≤ y˙ if there are x1 ∈ x˙ and y1 ∈ y˙ such that x1 ≤ y1 (see [3, pp. 99, 100] and [2, p. 16]). τ The symbol xn −→ x means that the sequence (xn)n converges to x with respect to the topology τ. Theorem 2.1. Let τ1 and τ2 be linear topologies on the Riesz space E such that (E, τ2) is a Fr´echet lattice and E has the (τ2, τ1)-SP. Let I be a τ2-closed ideal of E such that I has the (τ1, τ2)-PSP ((τ1, τ2)-SP, respectively) and E/I has the (τ ˙1, τ˙2)-PSP ((τ ˙1, τ˙2)-SP, respectively). Then E has the (τ1, τ2)-PSP ((τ1, τ2)-SP, respectively). Proof. Let us prove first the case of the (τ1, τ2)-PSP. Let (xn)n ⊆ E be a sequence such τ1 that xn ≥ 0 for every n and xn −→ 0, and let (xnj )j be an arbitrary subsequence of (xn)n. The continuity of the quotient operator π : (E, τ1) −→ (E/I, τ˙1) gives τ˙1 x˙ nj := π(xnj ) −→ 0 in E/I, and the fact that π is a Riesz homomorphism [3, Theorem 2.22] givesx ˙ nj ≥ 0 for every τ˙2 n. Calling on the (τ ˙1, τ˙2)-PSP of E/I, we getx ˙ nj −→ 0 in E/I. Since (E, τ2) is a Fr´echet lattice, in particular τ2 is a metrizable topology, hence it is generated by an invariant metric d: E × E −→ [0, ∞) (see [1, Theorem 5.10]). Therefore, the quotient topologyτ ˙2 in E/I is metrizable as well, and, in particular, it is generated by the invariant metric d˙: E/I × E/I −→ [0, ∞) , d˙(x, ˙ z˙) := inf{d(x − z,y): y ∈ I}, τ˙2 (see [22, Theorem 1.41]). Sincex ˙ nj −→ 0 if and only if inf{d(xnj ,y): y ∈ I} −→ 0, for every m ∈ N there exists Nm ∈ N such that 1 inf{d(x ,y): y ∈ I} < for every j ≥ N . nj m m N So, for m = 1 there exists N1 ∈ and yN1 ∈ I such that d(xnN1 ,yN1 ) < 1, for m = 2 1 there exists N2 > N1 and yN2 ∈ I such that d(xnN2 ,yN2 ) < 2 , and so on. In this fashion we construct a sequence (yNm )m in I and a subsequence (xnNm )m of (xnj )j such that 1 d(x − y , 0) = d(x ,y ) < for every m ∈ N. nNm Nm nNm Nm m τ2 It follows that xnNm −yNm −→ 0 em E. As τ2 is a metrizable locally convex-solid topology on E, combining [1, Lemma 5.75] and [2, Theorem 2.25] we conclude that τ2 is generated by a sequence (ρk)k of Riesz seminorms. This gives that ρk(xnNm − yNm ) −→ 0 for every N + + k ∈ , and applying the inequality |xnNm − yNm |≤|xnNm − yNm | (see [3, p. 8]), where yNm is the positive part of yNm , we get + N ρk(xnNm − yNm ) −→ 0 for every k ∈ , from which it follows that + τ2 xnNm − yNm −→ 0 in E. 3 + τ1 The (τ2, τ1)-SP of E gives xnNm − yNm −→ 0 in E, and from the linearity of τ1 we get + + τ1 yNm = xnNm − (xnNm − yNm ) −→ 0 in E, + τ1 + which gives yNm −→ 0 em I. Since I has the (τ1, τ2)-PSP and each yNm ∈ I is positive, + τ2 + τ2 we have yNm −→ 0 em I, hence yNm −→ 0 em E. Now the linearity of τ2 gives + + τ2 xnNm =(xnNm − yNm ) − yNm −→ 0 in E.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us