
CHAPTER FIVE: Constitutional Convention As a result of the problems experienced under the Articles of and Ratification Confederation, a meeting of representatives of all thirteen states was 5.1 The Constitutional called in 1786. Only five states showed Convention (Summer, 1787) up. Congress and each state were asked, 5.2 The Fight for Ratification – then, to send representatives to a meeting that was to be held in The Federalist Papers (1787- 1789) Philadelphia in 1787. The purpose was to 5.3 The Anti-Federalists change the Articles of Confederation and to strengthen the national government. Opposition Congress gave the state delegates 5.4 The Ratification of the only the authority to develop a plan to Constitution improve the Articles of Confederation. The report would then be sent back to KEY CONCEPTS AND VOCABULARY Congress. Fifty-five delegates attended the framers (no, NOT farmers!) • meeting which later became known as the • delegates Philadelphia Convention. From his • Federalist Papers Ambassador position in Paris, Thomas • ratification Jefferson wrote to John Adams that the • Federalist convention “really is an assembly of • Anti-Federalist demigods.” We now call these 55 men the • Virginia Plan framers of the Constitution. Jefferson did • bicameral legislature not take part in the drafting of the • executive branch Constitution. The average age (excluding Ben • judicial branch Franklin, who at 81 skewed the average) • federalism was forty-two, relatively young for such New Jersey Plan • an important assembly. One delegate was • amendment only twenty-six. Franklin, the oldest, and • Connecticut Compromise most respected American throughout the • three-fifths compromise world, was carried to his post on the • enumerated powers convention floor by four local prisoners. • necessary and proper clause Most of the fifty-five delegates had • clause considerable political experience; many • supremacy clause had attended the Second Continental • ex post facto laws Congress that created the Declaration of • advise and consent Independence. Although none of the framers were poor, and some of them • appropriation power quite rich, they were all said by a French override • diplomat to be “in easy circumstances.” • veto All were white and male. There were six • electoral college large plantation owners, eight important • judicial activism businessmen, three doctors. About half • status quo were college graduates – quite high for • factions that time. Seven were former governors • majority / super majority of their states; thirty-three were lawyers. • agrarian George Washington was the • Bill of Rights acknowledged leader, even though he did not want to attend, but gave in when he was convinced any change would not 5.1 THE CONSTITUTIONAL occur without his presence. He was CONVENTION (Summer, 1787) elected to preside over the convention. in Philadelphia,” refused in principal to He seldom spoke in debates. attend. Young (36 years old) James Madison’s notes are considered the The First Steps and the Virginia Plan: “official” notes of the proceedings. They were not published until 1836 – after his The Convention had a quorum – death. At only 36, he was a driving force enough people present to do business – at the convention, bringing the “Virginia on May 25, 1787. Almost immediately the Plan” that set the tone for the debates framers agreed on a few things: that followed. For his work he is often referred to as “The Father of the • They decided that the Articles were Constitution.” so defective that they should start The long, hot summer, the hall with from scratch and work on a new closed shutters (for secrecy), the Constitution. political intrigue and pressures – all of • They adopted a rule of secrecy, to these weighed heavily on those encourage free discussion, a attending the assembly. Even among minimum of public turmoil, and to this “assembly of demigods” some of the enhance its likelihood of passage. leaders stand apart. • They also decided that each state, It was Madison, along with Alexander regardless of delegation size, Hamilton and John Jay who wrote the should receive one vote when letters to newspapers called The voting on different aspects of the Federalist Papers. The letters helped creation of this new Constitution. to explain the arguments in favor of creating a new constitution. Madison, Hamilton and Jay used their extensive PROBLEM 5.1A knowledge of ancient governments and Evaluate the pros and cons of the two political theory to lead the debates in crucial decisions made at the beginning of both the convention and in their letters the convention: abolishing the Articles, to the newspapers. and the rule of secrecy. If a new Hamilton supported a strong national convention were called today, would government. (If he had had his way, we these same rules be adopted? Why or would have a President who serves for why not? life with absolute power over every act of the Congress.) He left the convention The creation of a new Constitution in a huff, but returned to sign the final began with a first session at which only document and argued brilliantly for its seven of the thirteen states had delegates passage. present. By the end of the convention Other major political figures were not every state except Rhode Island was as supportive of a strong central represented. However, it was not easy: government. George Mason, who remember, for many years these separate authored the Virginia Bill of Rights, was ex-colonies-now states thought of a strong supporter of the people’s rights themselves as separate entities, separate and of states’ rights. He opposed any countries. To come together now, to document that did not have a strong perhaps give some of their power up statement of these rights and he fought (especially a small state like Rhode against the ratification, or passage of Island) to an unknown entity, the national the Constitution. government, was a scary prospect to say Along with Jefferson, other prominent the least. figures from the fight for independence Madison took the initiative early in the were not in attendance. Thomas Paine convention and had Virginia Governor was in France; John Adams in England; Edmund Randolph bring forth the so- Patrick Henry, who said he “smelled a rat called Virginia Plan. The plan, contained in fifteen resolutions, proposed a truly that each state, no matter how many national government. people lived in it, would have the same Under this plan, there would be a number of representatives and votes. bicameral national legislature (two- Thus, at least in the Senate no state branch, or two-house legislature). The would have more power than any other voters would choose the representatives state. to one (lower) house directly. The other For more than two weeks the Virginia (upper) house would be itself chosen by Plan was debated. Finally, delegates from the lower house from nominations from New Jersey, a small state, came up with the state legislatures. Representation what is called the New Jersey Plan. would be proportional to population (thus, favoring the larger states…such as The New Jersey Plan: Virginia), and it could void any state law. In addition to the legislature, there William Patterson, of New Jersey, on would be two other branches of June 15, proposed what amounted to an government under this plan. The amendment (a change that is added on) executive branch (a president) would to the Articles of Confederation. Under be elected by the legislative branch. The this plan, there would be, as with the judicial branch (judges, court system) Articles, a one-house legislature; each would be selected by the legislature. state would get equal representation and There would be divided authority – votes in that house, and it would have what we call today federalism – in that increased authority. Congress (this one- a citizen of the United States would also house legislature) could pass laws be a citizen of their specific state. This affecting more than one state and other “dual citizenship” concept survives countries. Its taxing powers were today. increased, its laws and treaties would be The new national government would considered the supreme law of the have the power to collect its own taxes, country, and no state could make laws to make laws, and to enforce them in its that were contrary to Congress’ laws. own courts. With the Articles of Confederation, remember, the central PROBLEM 5.1B government could only request money, Can you name any laws, or types of laws, for example, and only states had the that are different from state to state? authority to raise that money by placing How about any laws that are different taxes upon their citizens. This would no between state and federal government? longer be a problem under the Virginia What might these differences mean? Plan. There was considerable debate In addition, the executive branch among the framers over the Virginia would be a group of several people, Plan. Most agreed that representation in selected by Congress to carry out national the House of Representatives (what the laws and appoint other necessary office lower house in the Virginia Plan was holders. Further, the members of this new called) should be based on population. executive branch would appoint a The main disagreement was about how supreme court to handle conflicts about many representatives each state could treaties, inter-state or international trade, have in the Senate (the upper house). and how taxes were to be dealt with. The bigger and more populous states Debate continued for another month. wanted the Senate also to be based on There were still major issues that proportional representation. Larger underlay the debate between the two states would have more votes, and plans. Without resolving these hence, more power, than less populated fundamental issues, the convention would states. soon fail.
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages13 Page
-
File Size-