Appendix 5D 2013 Summary of Representations Rep ID First Name Surname Organisation Change Section of PSLP Location of Change Changes sought Comments No. No. 303 Arron Twamley Savills / Barwood Strategic 8 Contents Page Table Heading Whilst Table 1 has been updated to take into account completions and the Land II LLP recent permission at Banbury 6 it remains unclear why further land has not been allocated for development within Banbury. Banbury is a primary regional centre and should therefore be the main focus for growth within the district up to 2031. 303 Arron Twamley Savills / Barwood Strategic 9 Contents Page Table Heading Whilst Table 1 has been updated to take into account completions and the Land II LLP recent permission at Banbury 6 it remains unclear why further land has not been allocated for development within Banbury. Banbury is a primary regional centre and should therefore be the main focus for growth within the district up to 2031. 303 Arron Twamley Savills / Barwood Strategic 10 Contents Page Table Heading Whilst Table 1 has been updated to take into account completions and the Land II LLP recent permission at Banbury 6 it remains unclear why further land has not been allocated for development within Banbury. Banbury is a primary regional centre and should therefore be the main focus for growth within the district up to 2031. 303 Arron Twamley Savills / Barwood Strategic 11 Contents Page Table Heading Whilst Table 1 has been updated to take into account completions and the Land II LLP recent permission at Banbury 6 it remains unclear why further land has not been allocated for development within Banbury. Banbury is a primary regional centre and should therefore be the main focus for growth within the district up to 2031. 207 Rob Kinchin- Banbury Civic Society 12 Executive Summary Developing a No specific comment made. Smith Sustainable Local Economy 207 Rob Kinchin- Banbury Civic Society 13 Executive Summary Developing a No specific comment made. Smith Sustainable Local Economy 207 Rob Kinchin- Banbury Civic Society 14 Executive Summary Table 1 Proposed No specific comment made. Smith Strategic Employment Allocations - Heading 207 Rob Kinchin- Banbury Civic Society 15 Executive Summary Table 1 Proposed No specific comment made. Smith Strategic Employment Allocations 207 Rob Kinchin- Banbury Civic Society 16 Executive Summary Table 2 Proposed No specific comment made. Smith Strategic Town Centre Allocations 207 Rob Kinchin- Banbury Civic Society 17 Executive Summary Building Sustainable Changes to the housing allocations noted. Concerned over the allocations at Smith Communities Banbury. 174 Theresa Goss Adderbury Parish Council 18 Executive Summary Building Sustainable The rate of housing delivery from the South East Plan has continued to be Communities used which is likely to lead to an overestimate of the need. 195 Andrew Docherty Hives Planning / Oxford 18 Executive Summary Building Sustainable The amount of housing proposed to be The Plan should not direct higher levels of housing to Bicester on grounds of Diocesan Board of Finance Communities allocated to Banbury should be under-delivery alone. An explanation for this is needed and why this departs (ODBF) and the trustees of increased. from the reasoned and sustainable position of the former RSS. The amount the Adderbury and Milton of housing proposed to be allocated to Banbury should be increased. Feoffee Charity 204 James Stevens Home Builders Federation 18 Executive Summary Building Sustainable The Council has considered the indications provided by the 2008-based Communities household projection for the district. An up to date SHMA is needed. The Council has not considered the likely impact of those planning decisions being made by its neighbours and by those other authorities in the wider housing market area. The annual housing requirement of 830 dwellings should be applied which is in line with the SHMA. Page 1 of 189 Appendix 5D 2013 Summary of Representations Rep ID First Name Surname Organisation Change Section of PSLP Location of Change Changes sought Comments No. No. 207 Rob Kinchin- Banbury Civic Society 18 Executive Summary Building Sustainable Changes to the housing allocations noted. Concerned over the allocations at Smith Communities Banbury. 236 S Brown Woolf Bond Planning LLP / 18 Executive Summary Building Sustainable The continued use of the housing requirement set in South East Plan raises Miller Strategic Land Communities concern. The Plan must be based upon objectively assessed development requirements (the SHMA). The Council will need to work with neighbouring authorities as well as producing a SHLAA to establish a realistic assumptions about the availability, suitability of land to meet the identified need for housing. There is no evidence to support the suggested windfall allowance. The production of SHMA and Duty to Cooperate are essential and must feed into the Plan. The Plan should identify Land at Warwick Road, Banbury as a housing allocation to provide for approximately 300 dwellings. The Housing Trajectory will need reviewing in particular the windfall allowance and the delivery rate at Canalside. Guidance and clarification needed on housing growth at rural villages. 249 Paul Burrell Pegasus Group / the 18 Executive Summary Building Sustainable Concerned over the implications of a no net inward migration assumption and Dorchester Group Communities whether the Plan has robustly assessed the needs arising from other areas of Oxfordshire, and beyond, in a sufficient evidence-based manner. The concentration of development at the two principal settlements will be at the expense of wider needs and effectively results in a moratorium on development in the rest of the District. The Housing Trajectory shows that there will be no delivery from sites of 10 or more dwellings in rural areas from 2018/19. Object to Bicester being the main location for growth as it ignores wider opportunities for growth. 281 V N Smith Quantock House 18 Executive Summary Building Sustainable Recent housing completions have failed to meet the South East Plan annual Communities requirement of 670 dwellings per annum. The projected housing completions should start with the actual figures for the last three years to prove that it is unrealistic to suggest that there will be a significant increase in the rate of completions in the near future. The current housing market does not help the local authority to achieve the housing requirements set. 204 James Stevens Home Builders Federation 19 Executive Summary Building Sustainable The majority of proposed development in Banbury and Bicester raises Communities concerns. The focus at the two main settlements will be at the expense of wider needs and may militate against effective delivery if Banbury and Bicester reach a saturation point. There is over reliance on the delivery at Banbury and Bicester therefore more housing should be allocated in the rural areas. 207 Rob Kinchin- Banbury Civic Society 19 Executive Summary Building Sustainable Changes to the housing allocations noted. Concerned over the allocations at Smith Communities Banbury. Page 2 of 189 Appendix 5D 2013 Summary of Representations Rep ID First Name Surname Organisation Change Section of PSLP Location of Change Changes sought Comments No. No. 249 Paul Burrell Pegasus Group / the 19 Executive Summary Building Sustainable Concerned over the implications of a no net inward migration assumption and Dorchester Group Communities whether the Plan has robustly assessed the needs arising from other areas of Oxfordshire, and beyond, in a sufficient evidence-based manner. The concentration of development at the two principal settlements will be at the expense of wider needs and effectively results in a moratorium on development in the rest of the District. The Housing Trajectory shows that there will be no delivery from sites of 10 or more dwellings in rural areas from 2018/19. Object to Bicester being the main location for growth as it ignores wider opportunities for growth. 6 Dominic Woodfield Bioscan (UK) Ltd 20 Executive Summary Building Sustainable Removal of reference to Gavray Drive as a consented site is welcomed. This Communities recognition reflects the current position of impasse with the promoters of that site, and it is worth stressing that this situation is not of Cherwell District Councils making but due to the applicant's continued reluctance to change their proposals to comply with local and national planning policy. 204 James Stevens Home Builders Federation 20 Executive Summary Building Sustainable The majority of development to Banbury and Bicester raises concerns. The Communities focus at the two main settlements will be at the expense of wider needs and may militate against effective delivery if Banbury and Bicester reach a saturation point. There is over reliance on the delivery at Banbury and Bicester therefore more housing should be allocated in the rural areas. 207 Rob Kinchin- Banbury Civic Society 20 Executive Summary Building Sustainable Changes to the housing allocations noted. Concerned over the allocations at Smith Communities Banbury. 249 Paul Burrell Pegasus Group / the 20 Executive Summary Building Sustainable Concerned over the implications of a no net inward migration assumption and Dorchester Group Communities whether the Plan has robustly assessed the needs arising from other areas of Oxfordshire, and beyond, in a sufficient evidence-based manner. The concentration of development at the two principal settlements will