NewsNet News of the Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies March 2019 v. 59, n. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS The Magnitsky Act - Behind the 3 Scenes: An interview with the film director, Andrei Nekrasov Losing Pravda, An Interview with 8 Natalia Roudakova Recent Preservation Projects 12 from the Slavic and East European Materials Project The Prozhito Web Archive of 14 Diaries: A Resource for Digital Humanists 17 Affiliate Group News 18 Publications ASEEES Prizes Call for 23 Submissions 28 In Memoriam 29 Personages 30 Institutional Member News Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies (ASEEES) 203C Bellefield Hall, 315 S. Bellefield Ave Pittsburgh, PA 15260-6424 tel.: 412-648-9911 • fax: 412-648-9815 www.aseees.org ASEEES Staff Executive Director: Lynda Park 412-648-9788, [email protected] Communications Coordinator: Mary Arnstein 412-648-9809, [email protected] NewsNet Editor & Program Coordinator: Trevor Erlacher 412-648-7403, [email protected] Membership Coordinator: Sean Caulfield 412-648-9911, [email protected] Financial Support: Roxana Palomino 412-648-4049, [email protected] Convention Manager: Margaret Manges 412-648-4049, [email protected] 2019 ASEEES SUMMER CONVENTION 14-16 June 2019 Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb Zagreb, Croatia The 2019 ASEEES Summer Convention theme is “Culture Wars” with a focus on the ways in which individuals or collectives create or construct diametrically opposed ways of understanding their societies and their place in the world. As culture wars intensify across the globe, we invite participants to scrutinize present or past narratives of difference or conflict, and/or negotiating practices within divided societies or across national boundaries. Keynote Speaker Wendy Bracewell (University College London) will explore “Culture Wars in the 18th-c Republic of Letters: Southeastern Europe on the Map of Civilization.” CONVENTION REGISTRATION All participants must register for the convention and pay registration fees. Registration info can be found HERE. Early registration ends on April 19. FUTURE OF THE FIELD CAMPAIGN DISSERTATION RESEARCH FUND Yana Skorobogatov Thanks to the nearly 200 members who have already 2016 Dissertation Research Grant Recipient committed to supporting the Future of the Field. It’s not History, Williams College • PhD, History, UC Berkeley too late to make a difference. Make your gift or pledge by June 30th to be counted. Announcing a New Dissertation Research Grant Thanks to ASEEES’s Dissertation Research Thanks to generous individual support ASEEES is able Grant, I was able to travel to Moscow to expand the number of Dissertation Research Grants to complete crucial research needed as available to students. I began writing my dissertation. I am grateful to those who funded this “We are both firm believers in the importance of Russian opportunity, without which, I may studies in American universities and American public life. not have been able to conduct the The only way to sustain a thoughtful analysis of Russia’s past, present, and future is to support future scholars and their necessary research and complete my work. This way the work begun by several generations of dissertation in a timely way. I am happy Russianists will continue for many years to come.” to say that my dissertation is now a book -- Joseph Bradley & Christine Ruane manuscript. Join Joseph and Christine to create more opportunities for student research YES - I want to make more Dissertation Research possible EEE AS S F U D T L U I E R F E TO LEARN MORE ABOUT HOW YOU CAN SUPPORT THE FUTURE OF THE FIELD O F T H E WWW.ASEEES.ORG/FUTURE NEWSNET March 2019 2 From studio shoot in Kiev. © Piraya Film AS. Photo: Anna Marchuk. The Magnitsky Act - Behind the Scenes An interview with the film director, Andrei Nekrasov CHOI CHATTERJEE, CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, LOS ANGELES In 2016, Andrei Lvovich Nekrasov, a well-known Russian film-maker, playwright, theater director, and actor, released a docudrama entitled, The Magnitsky Act—Behind the Scenes.1 Although the film won many artistic accolades, including a special commendation from the Prix Europa Award for a Television Documentary, public screenings were abruptly canceled in both Europe and the United States. Political pressure from various constituents and the threat of lawsuits from William Browder, the American-British billionaire and human-rights activist, ensured the limitation of the film to a single website. To the knowledge of this author, there has been only one public screening of The Magnitsky Act—Behind the Scenes in the United States. In June 2016, Seymour Hersch, a renowned investigative journalist, presided over a showing of the film at the Newseum in Washington, DC, that generated much controversy. The American press has not been kind to either the film or the director, Andrei Nekrasov. The Washington Post, The New York Times, The New Yorker, and The Daily Beast all seem to agree that the film is an overt work of Russian propaganda that aims to introduce confusion about the circumstances leading to the death of tax accountant, Sergei Magnitsky, in the minds of the viewers.2 The Putin administration, which has been the prime target of both the 2012 Sergei Magnitsky NEWSNET March 2019 3 Rule of Accountability Act and the with a real-life experience in the Andrei Nekrasov: I felt that the story 2016 Global Magnitsky Human Rights practice of critical thinking.3 The film of Magnitsky, in its accepted version, Accountability Act, has good reason also allows us to revive a discussion was very powerful and important. I to promote a film that questions of Hayden White’s penetrating thought that Sergei Magnitsky was the circumstances surrounding analysis of the ways in which the a hero, and I wanted to tell the story Magnitsky’s untimely death in structure of the form necessarily of the modern hero, my compatriot. Moscow’s Butyrka Prison in 2009. influences the content of any artistic His case seemed very special because 4 Despite a flood of persuasive or historical narrative. The vehicle of Magnitsky, a tax lawyer (in reality, articles and editorials by well-known the docudrama that Nekrasov uses in an accountant) had come from the journalists suggesting that this his film, and the competing narratives world of capitalism, to symbolize all inconvenient film deserves no more about the circumstances leading that is good and moral in modern than a quick burial, I was drawn to to Magnitsky’s death, merit literary Russia. I believed that Magnitsky reconsider both the film and the and intellectual analysis, along with did not surrender under torture and political controversy that it continues geopolitical commentary. sacrificed his life fighting corruption. to create for two main reasons. First, Second, I am concerned by the 2) Who has funded the making of as the collapse of the Soviet Union fact that both critics and supporters5 this film and what motivated them to and our own recent presidential have turned the debate about the invest in this production? campaigns show, we can never entirely film into a referendum on William prohibit the intrusion of propaganda Browder, his business dealings as well AN: The film was produced by or politically slanted content into the as his global human rights activism, Piraya Film, a Norwegian company. public sphere. Instead, as a historian and the Putin administration. In this There is a long list of funders, and and faculty member who serves at interview with Andrei Nekrasov, I turn none are from Russia. (Please visit a public university, I believe that it is the spotlight back on the film-maker, www.magnitskyact.com for further my job to teach our students how to his motivations for making the film, information). And they are all very diagnose an issue, and how to consider and on his political experiences since “mainstream.” I believe in the United the many sides that a story necessarily the release of the film. It is important States and Russia it is easier to construe involves. As an intellectual process to remember that in the past Nekrasov the specific reasons that motivate this has immense value both in and of has made several politically charged funders, who are mostly private, to itself. Source criticism is a time tested films including Disbelief (2004), and support a project. In Europe, where and reliable means through which Poisoned by Polonium: The Litvinenko more public money is available for we can make sense of an event or File (2007)—films that are extremely the arts, the state is more or less a phenomenon. Our students need critical of the Putin administration. obliged to fund the cultural process. to learn both the mechanics and the Nekrasov, a student of philosophy and So I submit an idea to a producer, and intellectual value of analyzing a source literature, is in the unique position of if they like it, they introduce it into and should be able to evaluate the having experienced censorship in the a complex system of funding that is nature of political content whether Soviet Union, Putin’s Russia, and in supposed to be politically neutral. it is embedded in a Facebook post, a the democratic countries of Western Only quality matters, in theory. In scholarly article, or a documentary. Europe and the United States. practice “quality” has political aspects, and its interpretation is open to The Magnitsky Act—Behind prejudices. the Scenes can serve as an important vehicle to introduce the contested Interview conducted by Barbara But it would be a simplification nature of historical truth, and as a Walker and Choi Chatterjee with Andrei to say the film was funded because prism, it allows us to view the multiple Nekrasov by email during January and I had set out to tell Browder’s modes through which various versions February 2019.