Essentials of Formal Logic Lesson 21: Chapter 6.1- 6.3 with Joelle Hodge

Essentials of Formal Logic Lesson 21: Chapter 6.1- 6.3 with Joelle Hodge

Essentials of Formal Logic Lesson 21: Chapter 6.1- 6.3 with Joelle Hodge Outline: Chapter 6, Lessons 6.1-6.3 Relationships of Equivalence Introduction to the relationships of equivalence Points to Remember (6.2) o The relationships of equivalence help us understand which propositions are identical to each other. o The relationships of equivalence can help in simplifying confusing arguments or in looking at an argument from a different angle. Points to Remember (6.3) o Every categorical proposition has an obverse relationship (A, E, I, O). o Obversion requires changing the quality of both the subject and predicate of the proposition. This is accomplished by: . Changing the quality of the subject term from affirmative to negative or from negative to affirmative. Changing the quality of the predicate term to its complement. o If a term has two “nons” in it, the “nons” cancel each other out. o Use caution in using opposite terms as complements. “Not all dogs are brown,” is equivalent to, “Some dogs are not brown.” Nate: So how do these relationships of equivalence work? Socrates: Well, it may help you to understand that better if I tell you that there are three main relationships of equivalence. They are conversion, contraposition, and obversion. Each of these propositions has specific rules that allow you to use it as a type of tool for changing propositions into equivalent propositions. It’s that concept of converting a proposition from one form into another that will be the key to understanding relationships of equivalence, which are also known as immediate inferences. Example: No pro-environmental activists are non-friends of humanity. Lesson 6.3, The Obverse Relationship o Every categorical proposition has an obverse relationship (A, E, I, O). o Obversion requires changing the quality of both the subject and predicate of the proposition. This is accomplished by: . Changing the quality of the subject term from affirmative to negative or from negative to affirmative. Changing the quality of the predicate term to its complement. o If a term has two “nons” in it, the “nons” cancel each other out. ©ClassicalU/Classical Academic Press 2020 • Lecture Outline o Use caution in using opposite terms as complements. o All men are mortals. A, Universal Affirmative o No men are non-mortals. o Some birds are flightless creatures. o Some birds are not non-flightless creatures. ©ClassicalU/Classical Academic Press 2020 • Lecture Outline .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us