Women in China: Detained, Victimized but Mobilized TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION1 1. WOMEN DETAINED2 A. Religious Repression..............................................................2 A.1 Tibetan Buddhists....................................................3 A.2 Roman Catholics......................................................4 A.3 Protestants................................................................6 A.4 Banned Religious Groups........................................ 6 B. State Secrets Cases................................................................. 8 C. Forgotten Prisoners and Victims.............................................11 2. OTHER VICTIMS: THE CONSEQUENCES OF SPEAKING OUT12 3. 1989 VICTIMS’ RELATIVES CAMPAIGN16 4. TORTURE AND ILL-TREATMENT17 A. Torture and Ill-treatment During Interrogation.......................18 B. Torture and Ill-treatment in Penal Institutions.........................19 C. Prohibition and Prosecution of Torture...................................21 D. Death in Custody....................................................................23 5. UPDATE ON THE ENFORCED BIRTH CONTROL POLICY26 6. THE DEATH PENALTY28 7. RECOMMENDATIONS33 8. APPENDICES35 CHINA Women in China: Detained, Victimized but Mobilized INTRODUCTION This report updates a document Amnesty International published in June 1995 cataloguing wide-ranging concerns about violations of the human rights of women in China. From 28 August to 8 September 1995 women in their thousands from across the world gathered in Beijing and Huairou for the Fourth UN World Conference on Women (WCW) and Non-governmental Organization (NGO) Forum. Under a banner of “equality, peace, justice, inclusiveness and the full participation of all”, women discussed their experiences and achievements and planned for future action. They lobbied governments who, through the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action adopted by the conference, reaffirmed the universality of human rights and “women’s rights are human rights”. Included in the documents were government commitments to: “the empowerment and advancement of women, including the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion and belief”; to the protection of “women engaged in the defence of human rights”; and to taking responsibility and acting against violence against women when the violence is perpetrated or condoned by the State. Many people from China who would have contributed to the diversity of opinion were prevented from attending the Forum by the authorities. Others at the Forum operated under strict and obtrusive surveillance by security personnel. Whilst the language of commitments was being finalized in Beijing, many Chinese dissidents and their relatives were detained, taken away from their home cities, or placed under heavy surveillance for the duration of the Forum and Conference, to prevent contact with foreign participants and the media. Women from all walks of life in China continue to suffer serious human rights violations. Women are sentenced to prison terms or periods of administrative detention for the peaceful exercise of their fundamental rights. Women have been detained as a result of the continued repression of un-registered religious activity; the stifling of political dissent; and the use of new state secrets legislation to stem the flow of politically sensitive information reaching the foreign media. Women and children also carry the often devastating consequences of the imprisonment of their male relatives. Women who have publicly challenged human rights violations inflicted on their relatives have faced periodic detention, constant surveillance, intimidation and harassment by the police. In the face of such persecution, some women have become increasingly bold. The wives of some currently detained prisoners of conscience are relentless in their pursuit of every legal means open to them to challenge the arbitrary detention of their loved ones. Wives and mothers who seek justice on behalf of relatives who have died in custody continue in their struggle. The mothers, wives and other relatives of the victims of the 4 June Massacre have also begun to petition the authorities and openly to protest the detention of members of their group. Under the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action adopted by the Fourth UN World Conference on Women (WCW) In Beijing in September 1995, governments have taken clear responsibility for violence against women when the violence is perpetrated or condoned by the State. They have made wide ranging commitments to act against violence against women. Since the WCW, the Chinese authorities have also made several reports at the UN level relating to torture and other human rights violations. This report examines relevant official statements, in the light of treaty and other commitments. Persistent reports of the torture and ill-treatment of women in police and penal custody demonstrate that anyone may be a AI Index: ASA 17/80/96Amnesty International July 1996 Women in China - Detained, Victimized but Mobilized victim. Torture and ill-treatment is perpetrated by state personnel or “cell bosses” who they encourage or condone. Former prisoners have testified to the torture of the shackle board being inflicted for months on women awaiting execution. This report examines cases of torture, ill-treatment and death in custody of women which illustrate that police and prison officials operate in a climate of impunity fostered by incommunicado detention, ineffective supervision, and an arbitrary approach to the investigation and prosecution of such cases. 1. WOMEN DETAINED The total number of women detained in China for the non-violent exercise of their rights to freedom of expression and association is impossible to determine. The government claims it holds no political prisoners, only people convicted of "counter-revolutionary" crimes (under a specific chapter of the Criminal Law which contains vaguely worded provisions allowing for imprisonment for peaceful political activities). However, in addition to charges of "counter-revolutionary activities", charges of leaking state secrets, of interfering with production or disturbing social order and ill-defined administrative offences are routinely used for politically motivated detention. Moreover, many political prisoners are held for long periods without charge, or are sentenced to up to three years of "re-education through labour" imposed without charge or trial. Others are sentenced to long prison terms after judicial proceedings which fall far short of international fair trial standards. A. RELIGIOUS REPRESSION Government officials have estimated that a substantial religious revival since the early 1980s has resulted in tens or hundreds of millions of followers for the five officially recognized religions in China. Many believers now belong to groups which are not recognized by the authorities or who choose not to register with the authorities and whose members are periodically harassed or detained. Some of their alleged leaders are imprisoned on charges of “disrupting public order”, “interfering with production” or “counter- revolutionary propaganda and agitation”. 1Some groups have had their property confiscated, or their places of worship or homes demolished. Police brutality has also reportedly been a feature of many raids on peaceful religious gatherings. Women have been in the frontline as victims of state repression of religious activity. In particular in the unregistered “house church” movement within the Christian community, the majority of worshippers and many leaders or preachers are women. In Tibet, Buddhist nuns have been detained for their prominent role in dissident activity. In January 1994 two new national regulations on religious activities came into force. One regulates the participation of foreigners in religious activities in China. The other reinforces provisions for the registration of “places of religious activity” outside of which religious activities may be considered illegal and participants detained and punished. The regulations include some new provisions to protect human rights, but also consolidate restrictions on religious activities perceived to “undermine national unity and social stability”, a formulation that leaves room for wide interpretation. 11 “China: Repression in the 1990s - a Directory of Victims” (AI Index: ASA 17/48/96, May 1996) lists hundreds of people known to Amnesty International who are believed to be currently imprisoned or to have been periodically detained by the authorities because of their religious beliefs. Amnesty International July 1996AI Index: ASA 17/80/96 Women in China - Detained, Victimized but Mobilized Provincial authorities have since promulgated their own regulations, and have pursued campaigns with varying degrees of severity to force various groups to register. Local regulations are reported to lack clarity and allow for arbitrary practices which in some areas are reported to restrict religious freedom even beyond the national law. 2 These practices have included interference in internal church practices, and monitoring for political loyalty. Underlying principles in some provinces have been reported as the “three fixes” - “fix the meeting place, fix the district within the church work is allowed, and fix the preacher” or the “three not alloweds” whereby family members of cadres or party members and people under 18 are prohibited from being believers. The authorities have recently reiterated the need to emphasise “patriotism”