Bibliography

Bibliography

Bibliography Books Bartlett, J. (2018). The people vs tech: How the internet is killing democracy (and how we save it). London: Ebury Press. Bentham, J (2002). Rights, representation, and reform: Nonsense upon stilts and other writings on the French Revolution (P. Schofield, C. Pease-Watkin, and C. Blamires, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press (“Nonsense Upon Stilts” skrevet ca. 1795, først udgivet 1816). Berger, J. (2013). Contagious. New York: Simon & Schuster. Cassin, B. (2018). Google me – One-click democracy. New York: Fordham (Org. French 2007). Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Ferguson, N. (2017). The square and the tower. Networks, hierarchies and the struggle for global power. London: Allen Lane. Foer, F. (2017). World without mind. London: Vintage Publishing. Galloway, S. (2017). The four. The hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google. London: Bentam Press. Garapon, A., & Lassègue, J. (2018). Justice digitale. Révolution graphique et rupture anthropologique. Paris: Presses universita- ires de France. Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. New Haven, CT: Yale Univrsity Press. Girard, R. (1978). Des choses cachées depuis la fondation du monde. Paris: Grasset. © The Author(s) 2020 267 F. Stjernfelt, A. M. Lauritzen, Your Post has been Removed, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25968-6 268 Bibliography Girard, R. (1982). Le bouc émissaire. Paris: Grasset. Hamerton-Kelly, R. (2007). Politics and apocalypse. East Lansing: MSU Press. Han, B.-C. (2017). Psycho-politics – Neoliberalism and new technolo- gies of power. London: Verso. Hansen, P. G., & Hendricks, V. (2011). Oplysningens blinde vinkler: En åndselitær kritik af informationssamfundet. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur. Hendricks, V. (2016). Spræng boblen. Sådan bevarer du fornuften i en ufornuftig verden. Copenhagen: Gyldendal. Hendricks, V., & Vestergaard, M. (2017). Fake News. Copenhagen: Gyldendal. Israel, J. (2001). Radical enlightenment. Philosophy and the making of modernity, 1650–1750. New York: Oxford University Press. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Chapter 11: Attention. In: C. D. Green (Ed.), Classics in the history of psychology, Last visited 08-05-18. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/James/Principles/ prin11.htm Kant, I. (2017). Oplysning, historie og fremskridt. Aarhus: Forlaget Slagmark. Kirkpatrick, D. (2010). The Facebook effect. The real inside story of Mark Zuckerberg and the World’s fastest-growing company. London: Virgin Books. Lanier, J. (2018). Ten arguments for deleting your social media accounts right now. London: The Bodley Head. Lynch, M. P. (2016). The internet of us. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation. Martínez, A. G. (2016). Chaos Monkeys: Mayhem and Mania inside the Silicon Valley Money Machine. London: Ebury Press. Mauss, M. Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques (2007, org. 1925) Paris: Presses universitaires de France. Mchangama, J., & Stjernfelt, F. (2016) MEN – Ytringsfrihedens his- torie i Danmark. Copenhagen: Gyldendal. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media – The extensions of man. London & New York: Routledge. Mill, J. S. (2011). On liberty. Canada: Batoche Books (org. 1859). Moore, M. (2018). Democracy hacked: Political turmoil and informa- tion warfare in the digital age. London: One World. Bibliography 269 Nagle, A. (2017). Kill all normies – Online culture wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-right. Hants, UK: John Hunt Publishing. Negroponte, N. (1996). Being digital. New York: Random House. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: University Press. Nørretranders, T. (1997). Stedet der ikke er – fremtidens nærvær, net- værk og internet. Copenhagen: Aschehough. O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Broadway Books. Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble. New York: Penguin Books. Pedersen, D. B., Collin, F., & Stjernfelt, F. (Eds.). (2018). Kampen om mennesket. Forskellige menneskebilleder og deres grænsestrid. Copenhagen: Reitzel. Pedersen, K. K. (2016). Phono Sapiens – Det langsomme pattedyr på speed. Copenhagen: Loopland Press. Postman, N. (1989). Fagre nye TV-verden. Oversat af Tatjana Andreassen. Copenhagen: Hekla. Sharkey, W. W.. (2008). The theory of natural monopoly (2008, org. 1982). Cambridge: Cambridge University press. Simon, H. A. (1971). Designing organisations for an information-rich world. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communications, and the public interest. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press. Stjernfelt, F. (2014). Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s Doctrine of Dicisigns. Boston: Docent Press. Stjernfelt, F. (2017). Syv myter om Martin Luther. Copenhagen: Gyldendal. Strossen, N. (2018). HATE: Why we should resist it with free speech, not censorship. New York: Oxford University Press. Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Taplin, J. (2017). Move fast and break things. London: Macmillan. Thiel, P. (with B. Masters). (2014). Zero to one: Notes on startups, or how to build the future. London: Virgin Books. Wu, T. (2018). The curse of bigness: Antitrust in the New Gilded Age. New York: Columbia Global Reports. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism – The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. New York: Public Affairs. 270 Bibliography Articles, Reports Ahmed, S. Google apologizes for results of ‘Michelle Obama’ image search CNN. 11-25-09. Alliance for Securing Democracy. Alliance for Securing Democracy Launches New Tool to Analyze Russian Interference Operations. Alliance for Securing Democracy. 12-06-18. Alliance for Securing Democracy. Hamilton 68. Alliance for Securing Democracy. Last visited 07-30-18: http://dashboard.securingde- mocracy.org. Amnesty International. FN’s verdenserklæring om men- neskerettighederne (1948). Amnesty International. Last visited 07-30-18: https://amnesty.dk/om-amnesty/ fns-verdenserklaering-om-menneskerettigheder. Amnesty International. Myanmar: New evidence reveals Rohingya armed group massacred scores in Rakhine State. Amnesty International. 05-22-18. Ananny, M. The partnership press: Lessons for platform-publisher collaborations as Facebook and news outlets team to fight misin- formation. The Tow Center for Digital Journalism. 04-04-18. Andersson, M. Når Facebook dræber samfundsdebatten. Berlingske. 07-25-18. Angwin, J., & Grassegger, H. Facebook’s secret censorship rules pro- tect white men from hate speech but not black children. Salon (originally appeared on ProPublica). 06-28-17. Angwin, J., & Tobin, A. Fair housing groups Sue Facebook for allow- ing discrimination in housing ads. ProPublica. 03-27-17. Angwin, J. & Tobin, M. & Varner, M. Facebook (still) Letting Housing Advertisers Exclude Users by Race. ProPublica. 11-21-17. Ariely, D. Apple should use the Iphone to stop distraction us. Wired. 04-17-18. Associated Press. Facebook expands gender options: transgender activists hail ‘big advance’. The Guardian. 02-14-14. Associated Press. It’s Rubens vs. Facebook in Fight over Artistic Nudity New York Times. 07-28-18. Associated Press. More than 1000 Google workers protest censored China search. Washington Post. 08-17-18. Barlow, J. P. A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Electronic Frontier Foundation. 02-08-96. BBC. Facebook ditches fake news warning flag. BBC News. 12-21-17. BBC. Russia trolls ‘spreading vaccination misinformation’ to create discord. BBC News. 08-24-18. Bibliography 271 Beers, B. How does Twitter Make Money? Investopedia. 04-25-18. Berger, J., & Milkman, K. L. (2012). What Makes Online Content Viral? Journal of Marketing Research, 49, s. 192–s. 205. Bloomberg Editorial Board. Don’t Break Up Facebook. Bloomberg Opinion. 07-16-18. Bloomberg Government. Transcript of Zuckerberg’s appearance before House committee. The Washington Post. 04-11-18. Blumenthal, P. Facebook and Google’s surveillance capitalism model is In trouble. Huffington Post. 01-27-18. Bokhari, A. (upload) The good censor – GOOGLE LEAK. Last visited 12-18-18: https://www.scribd.com/document/390521673/ The-Good-Censor-GOOGLE-LEAK#from_embed. Bolyard, P. 96 percent of Google search results for ‘Trump’ news are from liberal media outlets. PJ Media. 08-25-18. Boström, H. Hatet mot Google. GP. 03-19-18. Boyd, D. Streams of content, limited attention: The flow of informa- tion through social media. Conference: Web 2.0 Expo. 11-17-09. Brandom, R. The anti-monopoly case against Google. The Verge. 09-05-17. Brandom, R. Facebook took down a post by the Anne Frank Center for showing nude Holocaust victims. The Verge. 08-29-18. Breitenbach, D. Facebook apologizes for censoring prehistoric figu- rine ‘Venus of Willendorf’. dw.com. 03-01-18. Brin, S., & Page, L. The anatomy of large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Last visited 04-26-18: http://infolab.stanford. edu/~backrub/google.html. Cadwalladr, C. Google, democracy and the truth about internet search. The Guardian. 12-04-16. Cadwalladr, C. Google is not ‘just’ a platform. It frames, shapes and distorts how we see the world. The Guardian. 12-11-16. Cave, D. Australia Passes Law to Punish Social Media Companies for Violent Posts. New York Times. 04-03-19. CDT. The Santa Clara Principles on Transparency and Accountability

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    21 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us