Specific Ion Effects at Graphitic Interfaces

Specific Ion Effects at Graphitic Interfaces

ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12854-7 OPEN Specific ion effects at graphitic interfaces Cheng Zhan1, Maira R. Cerón 1, Steven A. Hawks 1, Minoru Otani 2, Brandon C. Wood1, Tuan Anh Pham1*, Michael Stadermann1* & Patrick G. Campbell 1* Improved understanding of aqueous solutions at graphitic interfaces is critical for energy storage and water desalination. However, many mechanistic details remain unclear, including how interfacial structure and response are dictated by intrinsic properties of solvated ions under applied voltage. In this work, we combine hybrid first-principles/continuum simulations 1234567890():,; with electrochemical measurements to investigate adsorption of several alkali-metal cations at the interface with graphene and within graphene slit-pores. We confirm that adsorption energy increases with ionic radius, while being highly dependent on the pore size. In addition, in contrast with conventional electrochemical models, we find that interfacial charge transfer contributes non-negligibly to this interaction and can be further enhanced by confinement. We conclude that the measured interfacial capacitance trends result from a complex inter- play between voltage, confinement, and specific ion effects-including ion hydration and charge transfer. 1 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA. 2 National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba 305-8568, Japan. *email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2019) 10:4858 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12854-7 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12854-7 queous solutions at voltage-biased graphitic interfaces are first-principles density functional theory (DFT) with the reference essential to a variety of energy and environmental tech- interaction site model (RISM) to explicitly account for electronic A 1,2 26 nologies, including supercapacitors for energy storage effects in the description of the ion–electrode interaction .We and capacitive deionization for water desalination and purifica- show that large polarized cations exhibit strong adsorption and a tion3–6. Within these devices, a detailed understanding of specific significant degree of charge transfer at the interface with gra- ion effects at the interface and their influence on interfacial phene. In addition, these effects are found to be enhanced for capacitance is crucial for predicting and optimizing performance. solutions confined in graphene slit pores. Combining these the- However, a general consensus on how the interfacial response is oretical findings with direct electrochemical experiments enables governed by intrinsic properties of ions remains largely lacking, us to elucidate key factors that determine the structure and and contradictory trends have been reported, even for simple electrical response of aqueous solutions at the interfaces and at alkali-metal ions. For instance, measurements of activated porous the same time provide insights into the fundamental interplay carbons in aqueous solutions showed that the overall capacitance between confinement and specific ion effects on both capacitance increases with the ionic radius of the ions according to and ion selectivity of porous carbon materials. Liþ < Naþ < Kþ7–9, whereas an inverse relationship was reported by another experimental study10. These contradictory results highlight that much is left to be understood regarding ion effects Results at graphitic interfaces. In addition, they point to the need for a Cation adsorption at the graphene interface. We begin by dis- better understanding of how these effects are influenced by cussing the behavior of aqueous LiCl, NaCl, KCl, and CsCl confinement, which necessarily accompanies the porous nature of solutions near an ideal graphene electrode, which represents a many carbon materials. well-defined model system that can be reasonably compared with In a recent study, highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) the recent experimental investigation on HOPG11.Wefirst was employed as a model system for investigating specific ion compute the capacitance of these systems using a purely classical effects on graphene capacitance11. By considering solutions with a description for the solution environment within the RISM series of alkali-metal cations, from Liþ,Naþ,Kþ,Rbþ to Csþ, approach (see “Methods”), with the electrode explicitly described with ClÀ counterions, the authors showed that the basal-plane by DFT. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 1, we find that all the capacitance of the system increases with the ionic radius of the solutions exhibit nearly identical theoretical capacitance. This cations, with CsCl yielding the highest capacitance among the behavior is similar to the previous MD studies7. However, it is not solutions. This study provides the first experimental demonstra- consistent with experimental measurements of the graphene basal tion of the relationship between cation identity and capacitance plane reported in ref. 11, which show that the capacitance should for graphene as a well-defined carbon electrode in contrast with increase with the ionic radius. This indicates that classical activated carbons, for which definitive conclusions are generally descriptions of the ions based on the point charge approximation more difficult to draw due to the inherent chemical and structural —while likely adequate for bulk electrolyte solutions—are insuf- complexity. ficient for properly capturing the experimentally measured cation In addition to experimental studies, molecular dynamics (MD) effects at interfaces. simulations with classical force fields have been extensively Next, to seek a more realistic description of the cations at the employed to investigate aqueous solutions near graphene7,12–14, interface and elucidate the origins of the discrepancies with as well as within carbon nanotubes15–23 and carbon slit pore experiments, we include an explicit cation in each of our electrodes24,25. While these simulations have significantly computational models of the interface and directly investigate its advanced our understanding of the electric double layer (EDL) at adsorption behavior. In this case, the explicit cation and carbon graphitic interfaces, notable discrepancies between theoretical and electrode are treated by DFT, and the rest of the electrolyte is experimental studies remain to be addressed. As a prime example, described through the RISM approach. The calculated potential Bo et al.7 calculated the capacitance of a graphene electrode in energy surface (PES) as a function of the distance between the aqueous electrolytes with alkali-metal cations using classical MD cation and a charged graphene sheet (with a charge density of simulations, showing that the capacitance does not depend on the À0:0052e per carbon atom, or about À0:25 V versus the potential cation type due to the high dielectric constant of liquid water. of zero charge), is shown in Fig. 1a. The results, which are This is, however, in contrast to the experimental results reported referenced to the potential of the ions in the bulk electrolyte in the same study. To explain this discrepancy, a kinetic- solution, indicate that cations with larger ionic radius exhibit stronger adsorption at the interface. In particular, at this dominated charging mechanism was proposed and supported by þ þ capacitance measurements at different scan rates, pointing to the electrode charge density, Cs and K are favorably absorbed at importance of ion kinetics on the electrochemical performance. the interface, exhibited by a negative local minimum in the free However, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements energy landscape at a distance of 3.3 and 3.0 Å from the graphene þ in ref. 11 show that distinctive difference in the capacitance electrode, respectively. This is in contrast to the smaller Li and þ between the cations remains at a low frequency; for instance, the Na ions, which exhibit unfavorable interfacial adsorption at this measured capacitance in KCl and LiCl solutions were 8 μFcmÀ2 charge density. Nevertheless, adsorption of these smaller cations À μ 2 þ þ and 5 Fcm , respectively, resulting in a CK /CLi ratio as can be induced by further increasing the electrode charge density, large as 1.6. This indicates that ion kinetics may not be solely eventually leading to binding for Liþ and Naþ at 2.3 and 2.7 Å responsible for the difference in the capacitance between different from the graphene plane, respectively (see Supplementary Fig. 2 aqueous solutions, motivating further development in theoretical and Supplementary Table 1). Note that the positions of the first descriptions of the electrical response of solutions at graphitic local minima in the PES are highly correlated with the ionic interfaces. radius. Here we combine hybrid first-principles/continuum simula- The conclusion that cations with a larger ionic radius exhibits tions with electrochemical measurements to understand ion stronger adsorption at the interface with graphene is also effects at graphitic interfaces. Rather than relying on conventional consistent with a recent theoretical study using a combination computational methods grounded exclusively in classical force of DFT and the conductor-like polarizable continuum model fields, for which results depend on the specific parameterization, (CPCM) for liquid water13. However, it is necessary to point out we utilize a newly developed theoretical

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us