Radioactive Element 94 from Deuterons on Uranium

Radioactive Element 94 from Deuterons on Uranium

PH YSICAL RKQ f. E%' VOLUME 69, NUMBERS 7 AND 8 APRf'L 1 AND 15, 1946 p~.5 as. it was in the experiments of Halban, Joliot, . ~etters to t.xe 'ci,itor Kowarski, and Perrin. ~ Presumably it can be made so with other methods of slowing down the neutrons. Some con- ~ ~ ROMPT pwhlscstios 0f brjtf reports of important dis centration of the U™isotope may be necessary if p is to ~ ~ ~ be 5. Since the number of neutrons evolved per fission' cogferies ie Physics may be secgtred by addressing them ~. ~ to this department. The cking date for this department is tke is 3 the divergent chain can develop if more than one on third of tke month. Because of the late closing date for the sec- the average gives 6ssion and the present condition be U'3'. tion no proof can be skmen to authors. The Board of Bditors satisfied if more than one gives does not koQ itself responsible for the opinions expressed by It seems likely, however, that of the three nuclei OsU~O, tke correspondents. Communications skogtQ not in general ex- 9sEkaRe'I', and 94EkaOs~ only the last might be expected ceed 600 words in lengtIg. to have a large cross section for 6ssion. The excess energy in the 9~U'4O and ~3EkaRe'4' nuclei after capture of neutrons bv O~U'I' and 93EkaRe3', respectively, would be small compared to what it is in the sqU'3' nuclei coming from Atoxnic Energy from U"8 siU~'. The cross sections for fission would thus be corre- LOVgS A. TURNER spondingly small. In &4EkaOs"o, on the other hand, the Palmer Phys&a/ Laboratory, Princeton University, excess would even in I~U&s a, Priugton, %no Jersey energy be larger than and May 29, 19~ large cross section for fission mould be expected. It might thus be necessary to allow U from mhich the g~U"' had ~HE recent experiments of Nier, Booth, Dunning, been used up to lie idle for several times the as yet un- and Grosse' and of Kingdon, Pollock, Booth, and known half-life of »Ekake~' until a sufhcient quantity of Dunnings have con6rmed Bohr's predictions that the 94EkaOs'" had developed in it, after which it could again nuclear 6ssion produced in U by thermal neutrons is to be used. This could be repeated until all of the 9~U'l8 had be attributed practically entirely to the rarer isotope of been converted. mass 235. This is present in an amount only 1/139 as great as that of the 23S isotope, so it is natural to conclude that *This letter was received for publication on the date indicated but was voluntarily withheld from publication until the end of the war. only 1/140 of any quantity of U can be considered as a ' Nier. Sooth. Dunning, and Grosse, Phys. Rev. 57, 748 (1940). possible source of atomic if slow neutrons are to ~ Kingdon, Pollock, Booth, and Dunning, Phys. Rev. 57, 749 {1940}. energy 3 N. Bohr and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 56, 426 (1940). be used. It seems likely, however, that this is wrong, that 4 L. A. Turner, Phys. Rev. 57, 951 (1940). 4 Halban, Joliot, Kowarski, and Perrin, J. de phys. et rad. 10, 428 the energy of a large part of the UI38 nuclei can also possibly (1939).See also L. A. Turner, Phys. Rev. 57, 334 (1940). be made to undergo 6ssion by slow neutrons in an indirect way. This is of obvious importance for practical utilization of the atomic energy of U. The indirect use of U'~ can come about through the Radioactive Element 94 from Deuterons 6ssion either of the U~ nuclei formed by the capture of OQ Uranium U~'. neutrons, or of the nuclei descending from In a forth- G. T. SEABORG, E. M. MCNAB. g.AN. J. W, KENNEDY, coming paper4 it is shown that 9sEkaRe and 94EkaOs~3', AND A. C. WAHL Department of Chemistry, Radiation Laboratory, Department of Physics, the probable long-lived descendants from U~~, would be University of California, Berkeley, California expected to undergo fission upon capture of thermal January 28, 1941+ neutrons. A similar argument leads to the conclusion that E are writing to report some results obtained in the U~ itself would probably also give fission with thermal bombardment of uranium with deuterons in the neutrons. For such fission to be of consequence it is neces- 60-inch cyclotron. sary that nearly one U~ atom be produced for every U~' The uranium was bombarded in the form of and atom lost. That this condition can be satisfied may be Ups the deuterons had to pass through a 2-mii thickness of seen as follows. Consider N secondary neutrons. A number aluminum foil before hitting the uranium target. The Np will sufFer resonance capture by U~ to give U~, carefully puri6ed element 93 fraction contained. a beta- p being the probability for such capture. The remaining activity whose aluminum absorption curve on an N(i -p) neutrons will become thermal. Of these, N(1 —p)m (taken ionization chamber connected to an FP-54 tube and also will produce Gssion of U"' nuclei and N(i —p)(i —gent) will be captured by U~ nuclei, m being the probability that a on a Lauritsen electroscope) was distinctly difFerent from 9323' thermal neutron will produce fission. It is assumed that no the absorption curve of a sample of the 2.3-day other capture processes are important for the thermal (formed from uranium plus neutrons) taken under identical neutrons, that a non-capturing method of slowing the conditions. The upper energy limit of the beta-particles neutrons needed for developing the divergent chain re- from this new 93 activity is about 1 Mev, compared with action has been found. The total number of U~ nuclei about 0.5 Mev for 9P'. The ratio of gamma-ray to beta- formed is thus Np+N(i-p)(1 —i') and the number of particle ionization is about five times 1arger than for 93s3' U~ nuclei lost is N(i-p)m. The condition that every The initial part of the absorption curve of this 93 from U~s nucleus be replaced by a U~ or descendant nucleus uranium plus deuterons is very similar to the initial part becomes Np+N(i-p)(i-ie)&E(i —p)m which reduces of the absorption, curve of 93'3'. Of course the production to 1"/(1-p) &2m. Since m& 1 this condition can be met if of 93~ is expected in the deuteron bombardment of ura- LETTERS TO TH E E D I TOR nium, from the reaction UNs (d, s,)93ss. it is impossible to ion. VA'th the help of persulfate ion it has been possible deduce from the absorption curve the relative intensities to separate quantitatively this, radioactivity from thorium, of the new 93 and of 93~, since the initial parts of the in- by using the beta-active UXi as an indicator for thorium. dividual absorption curves of these two activities might These experiments make it extremely probable that this well be nearly identical. The rate of decay of the high en- alpha-radioactivity is due to an isotope of element 94. ergy beta-particles (0.5-j, Mev) and gamma-rays from the The experiments are being continued. uranium 93 of plus deuterons was determined. This gave *This letter was received for publication on the date indicated but a half-life of about 2 days for the new 93. This activity is was voluntarily withheld from publication until the end of the war. ~ G. T. Seaborg. E. M. McMiilan, J. W. Kennedy and A. C. Wahl, probably to be assigned to 93~, 93~', or 93~5 formed in Phys. Rev. 69, 366 (1946). the reaction U~(tg, 2g)93sls, Uss5(g, g)93&s, or U&&(J 2~)93»5 respectively. The growth of alpha-particles, which might be due to Search for Spontaneous Fission in 9423' the eIement 94 daughter of the 2-day 93, was then looked JOSEPH %. KENNEDY AND ARTHUR C. &AHA for. We did observe the growth of alpha-particles in the Berkeley, California very carefully purified, as well as in the semi-purified 93 December 4, 1941* -fractions, and the growth curves indicate a half-life of roughly 2 days for the parent of the alpha-emitter. The HIS report describes the experimental procedure and final alpha-particle count amounts to several hundred gives the results obtained in our search for spon counts per minute for a bombardment, of 200 microampere- taneous fission in 94~. The observations were made on a hours. This work was done with a proportional type 3.5-microgram sample of 94~i', the preparation of which counter. We plan to re-determine the alpha-particIe growth was described in a report of July 24, 1941, from this 1abora- curve more accurately Using an ionization chamber and tory. This sample, when placed on one electrode of an linear amphfier with the help of a magnetic field to bend ionization chamber connected to a linear amplifier ad- out the very strong beta-particle background. The alpha- justed to record counts due to fissions, gave zero counts particles have a range of approximately 3.9 cm in air. in 139 hours. In another, independent experiment, done This alpha-activity is chemically separable from uranium in a similar manner with entirely di8'erent apparatus, and 93. The chemical experiments so far indicate a simi- this sample gave zero counts in 209 hours.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    2 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us