Lectures on Torus Embeddings and Applications (Based on Joint Work with Katsuya Miyake)

Lectures on Torus Embeddings and Applications (Based on Joint Work with Katsuya Miyake)

Lectures on Torus Embeddings and Applications (Based on joint work with Katsuya Miyake) By Tadao Oda Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Bombay 1978 Lectures on Torus Embeddings and Applications (Based on joint work with Katsuya Miyake) By Tadao Oda Published for the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Bombay Springer–Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York 1978 c Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, 1978 ISBN 3–540–08852–0 Springer–Verlag Berlin. Heidelberg. New York ISBN 0–387–08852–0 Springer–Verlag New York. Heidelberg. Berlin No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by print, microfilm or any other means with- out written permission from the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Colaba, Bombay 400 005 Printed by K. P. Puthran at the Tata Press Limited, 414 Veer Savarkar Marg, Bombay 400 025 and published by H. Goetze, Springer–Verlag, Heidelberg, West Germany Printed In India Introduction In recent years, the theory of torus embeddings has been finding many applications. The point of the theory lies in its ability of translating meaningful algebra-geometric and analytic phenomena into very simple statements about the combinatorics of cones in affine space over the reals. In different terminology, it was first introduced by Demazure [8] and then by Mumford et al. [63], Satake [57] and Miyake-Oda [40]. There is already a good and concise account on it in [63]. Nevertheless, we produce here another. For one thing, we wanted to supply the details of the partial classification of complete non-singular 3-dimensional torus embeddings announced in [40]. Besides, we wanted to make the theory, in its most general form, ac- cessible to non-algebraic geometers in view of its possible applications in other branches of mathematics. We can state at least the main re- sults without using algebraic geometry, although for the proof we cannot avoid using it. This was made possible by the following down-to-earth description due to Ramanan of normal affine torus embeddings over a field k of finite type as the set of unitary semigroup homomorphisms U(σ) = Hom .(σ ˇ M, k), unit.semigr ∩ r r where (i)N Z and σ is a convex rational polyhedral cone in NR R with σ ( σ) = 0 , (ii) for the dual Z-module M of N, ∩ − { } σˇ M = m M : m, y 0 for all y σ ∩ { ∈ h i≥ ∈ } is a finitely generated additive semigroup and (iii) k is considered to be a semigroup under the multiplication. v vi 0. Introduction When we have a suitable collection of such cones, an r.p.p. de- △ composition, then U(σ)′ s can be canonically patched together to form a normal and separated algebraic variety over k locally of finite type T emb( ) N △ which has an effective action of the algebraic torus T = N Z k∗ = Hom (M, k∗) = k∗ ... k∗ N ⊗ gr × × with a dense orbit. Such a variety is called a torus embedding, since it is a partial compactification of TN. Conversely, we get all normal torus embeddings in this way (Theorem 4.1). Important Algebre-geometric phenomena can most often be described purely in terms of (Theorems △ 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and Corollary 4.5). We may say that contains all the relevant information, in a unified △ and globalized way, about the “exponents of monomials” necessary to describe such varieties. When an algebraic variety or a morphism can be described solely in terms of monomials, then there is a good chance that it can most effectively be described in terms of torus embeddings. For instance, a normal irreducible affine algebraic variety V A defined ⊂ r by equation of the form a1 a2 ar b1 b2 br X1 X2 ... Xr = X1 X2 ... Xr can be expressed as U(σ) for some σ. (cf. (7.9)) We try to avoid overlaps with Demazure [8] and Mumford et al. [63] as much as possible. For later convenience for reference, we collect to- gether in . 4 the first main theorem in their most general form and leave § their proof to . 5. Various standard examples are collected together in § . 7. § In . 6, we deal with torus embedding which can be embedded into § projectives spaces. The results are slightly more general than those in [8] but less so than those in [63]. 8 and . 9 are devoted to the classification of complete non- § § singular torus embeddings. We are reduced to the classification of cer- tain weighted circular graphs and that of weighted triangulations of the vii 2-sphere. As by-products, we obtain many interesting complete non- singular rational three folds. (cf. Prop. 9.4) Besides, we see that torus embeddings provides us with a good testing ground for important con- jectures on birational geometry in higher dimension. There are many basic results we left out : For the cohomology of equi variant coherent sheaves on torus embeddings as well as the de- scription of the automorphism groups of torus embeddings, we refer the reader to Demazure [8]. Mumford et al. [63] generalizes the notion of torus embedding to that of toroidal embeddings and proves very important semi-stable re- duction theorem. Torus embeddings have also been used effectively in the compactification problem of the moduli spaces by Satake [57], Hirzebruch [19], Mumford et al.[61], Namikawa [46], Nakamura [44], Rapoport [54], Oda-Seshadri [49] and Ishida [26]. Here we deal with more elementary but illustrative applications in Chapter 2. When the ground field k is the field C of complex numbers or one with a non-archimedean rank one valuation, then U(σ) = Homunit.semigr. (σ ˇ M, k), hence T emb( ), has the topology induced from that of k ∩ N △ by the valuation. Let CTN be the maximal compact torus of TN in this topology. Then we can usually draw the picture of the quotient of a torus embedding T emb( ) by CT and get better geometric insight. N △ N The quotient was introduced by Mumford et al. [61]. We call it the manifold with corners after Borel-Serre [4] and denote it by Mc(N, ) = T emb( )/CT . △ N △ N Using this we will be able to visualize the construction and degen- erations of complex tori, Hopf surfaces and other class VII0 surfaces introduced by Inoue. (cf. 11, . 13, . 14 and . 15). Using Suwa’s § § § § classification of hyper elliptic surfaces om [60], Tsuchihashi [62] were able to describe their degenerations and the compactification of the mod- uli space in terms of torus embeddings. There are many recent results on the actions of algebraic and an- alytic groups other than algebraic tori on algebraic varieties and com- plex manifolds. See, for instance, Akao [1], Popov [52], [53], Orlik- Wagreich [50] and Ishida [25]. viii 0. Introduction Complete non-singular 2-dimensional torus embeddings over C give 2 2 rise to rational compactifications of C and (C∗) . Compactifications of C2 were shown to be always rational by Kodaira [31] and were classified by Morrow [37]. There are, however, many non-rational, even non- 2 algebraic, compactifications of (C∗) . They were recently classified by simha [58] and Ueda [64]. These notes are based on a joint work with K. Miyake of Nagoya University and grew out of the lectures which the author gave at Tata In- stitute of Fundamental Research, University of Paris-Sud, Orsay, Nagoya University, Tohoku University, Instituto Jorge Juan, Harvard University and various other places. He would like to thank the mathe- maticians at these institutions for the hospitality and the patience shown to him. The notes taken by K.Makio at Tohoku University was very helpful.1 Recall that for a connected locally noetherian scheme X, its du- alizing complex RX is determined uniquely up to quasi-isomorphism, dimension shift and the tensor product of invertible 0X-modules. (cf. Hartshorne, Residue and duality, Lecture Notes in Math. 20, Springer- Verlag, 1966). Let T = TN be an algebraic torus and consider the normal torus em- bedding Temb( ) corresponding to an r.p.p.decomposition (N, ). Let △ △ us fix an orientation for each cone σ and define, in case dim τ ∈ △ − dim σ = 1, the incidence number [σ : τ] = 0, 1 or 1 in an appropriate − manner so that we have a complex d C( , Z) = (... 0 C0 C1 ... Crank N 0 ...) △ → → → → → → → where C j is the free Z-module generated by the set of j-dimensional cones in and where △ d(σ) = [σ : τ](τ). dim τXdim σ=1 − 1After these notes were written, M.Ishida of Tohoku University obtained the fol- lowing seemingly definitive result on the Cohen-Macaulay and Gorenstein properties in relation to torus embeddings. ix Let X be a T-invariant closed connected reduced subscheme of Temb( ) and consider the complex R of 0 -modules defined by △ X X R j = 0 X ⊕ Y where the direct sum is taken over all the T-invariant closed irreducible subvarieties of X which is of codimension j in Temb( ) and where δ : j j+1 △ RX RX is defined as follows : X = orb(σ) for a star closed → σ S∈ subset = σ ; orb(σ) X . When Y =Porb(σ), then for fσ 0 , { ∈△ ⊂ } ∈ Y P δ( fσ) = [σ : τ](the restriction of fσ to orb(τ)) X with the sum taken over τ with dim τ dim σ = 1. ∈△ − Theorem 0.1 ((Ishida)). If X is a T-invariant closed connected reduced subscheme of a normal torus embedding Temb( ), then R defined above △ X is the dualizing complex for X. For ρ E, let = σ ; σ < ρ and consider the complex of ∈ ρ { ∈ } k-modules C( ρ, k)P with the coboundaryP map induced by d.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    158 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us