MARY ZIEGLER BOOKS AND BOOK CHAPTERS DOLLARS FOR LIFE: THE ANTIABORTION MOVEMENT, CAMPAIGN FINANCE, AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY (forthcoming, Yale University Press, 2022) ABORTION AND THE CONSTITUTION (under contract, Routledge Press) RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON INTERNATIONAL ABORTION LAW (editor) (forthcoming, Elgar Press) ABORTION IN AMERICA: A LEGAL HISTORY, ROE V. WADE TO THE PRESENT (Cambridge University Press, 2020) BEYOND ABORTION: ROE V. WADE AND THE FIGHT FOR PRIVACY (Harvard University Press, 2018) AFTER ROE: THE LOST HISTORY OF THE ABORTION DEBATE (Harvard University Press, 2015) Before Roe v. Wade, CAMBRIDGE HISTORY OF SEXUALITY IN THE UNITED STATES eds. Nicholas Syrett and Jennifer Mannion (forthcoming, Cambridge University Press) Introduction, in THE RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON INTERNATIONAL ABORTION LAW, editor Mary Ziegler (forthcoming, Elgar) From Reproductive Rights to Reproductive Justice, in THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF FEMINISM LAW IN THE UNITED STATES, eds. Deborah Brake, Martha Chamallas, and Verna Williams (forthcoming, Oxford University Press) Roe v. Wade and the Cultural Politics of Abortion, in THE COMPANION TO THE POLITICS OF AMERICAN HEALTH, eds. Sophia A. Jones and Martin Halliwell (forthcoming, University of Edinburgh Press) Comment: Young v. UPS, in FEMINIST JUDGMENTS: REWRITTEN REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE, ed. Kim Mutcherson (Cambridge University Press, 2019) Twentieth Century Legal History, in THE HISTORY OF THE TWENTIETH-CENTURY UNITED STATES (Routledge, 2018) Roe v. Wade, in THE OXFORD RESEARCH ENCYCLOPEDIA OF AMERICAN HISTORY (Oxford, 2017) A Provider’s Right to Choose: A Legal History, in ABORTION IN TRANSNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE ed. Shannon Stetner et al. (Palgrave-Macmillan, 2017) Comment: Harris v. McRae, in FEMINIST JUDGMENTS: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE, eds. Linda Berger, Bridget Crawford, and Kathy Stanchi (Cambridge University Press, 2016) AWARDS Thomas J. Wilson Memorial Prize for Best First Book in Any Genre, Harvard University Press, 2014 University Teaching Award, Florida State University, 2016 The Transformation Through Teaching Award, Florida State University, 2015 ARTICLES UNESSENTIAL: ABORTION LAW BEFORE AND AFTER COVID-19, Cornell Law Review Online (forthcoming 2021) UNSETTLED LAW: SOCIAL-MOVEMENT CONFLICT, STARE DECISIS, AND ROE V. WADE, Connecticut Law Review (Forthcoming 2022) ABORTION AND THE LAW OF INNOCENCE, Illinois Law Review (forthcoming 2021) THE EQUALITY WARS, Colorado Law Review (forthcoming 2021) BAD EFFECTS: THE MISUSE OF HISTORY IN BOX V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD, Cornell Law Review Online 105: 165 (2020) MEN’S REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS, Pepperdine Law Review 47: 665 (2020) EARNED RIGHTS, N.Y.U. J. L. & Soc. Change 40: 261 (2020) TAMING UNWORKABILITY DOCTRINE: RETHINKING STARE DECISIS, Arizona Law Review 50: 1215 (2019) WHAT IS RACE? Connecticut Law Review 50: 279 (2018) BEYOND BALANCING: RETHINKING THE LAW OF EMBRYO DISPOSITION, American University Law Review 68: 515 (2018) RETHINKING AN UNDUE BURDEN: WHOLE WOMAN’S HEALTH’S NEW APPROACH TO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, Tennessee Law Review 85: 461 (2018) AFTER LIFE: GOVERNMENTAL INTERESTS AND THE NEW ANTIABORTION INCREMENTALISM, University of Miami Law Review 73: 78 (2018) THE JURISPRUDENCE OF UNCERTAINTY: KNOWLEDGE, SCIENCE, AND ABORTION, Wisconsin Law Review 2018: 317 (2018) WHAT IS SEXUAL ORIENTATION? Kentucky Law Review 106:61 (2018) SOME KIND OF PUNISHMENT: PENALIZING WOMEN FOR ABORTION, William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 26:735 (2018) THE NEW NEGATIVE RIGHTS: ABORTION FUNDING AND CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AFTER WHOLE WOMAN’S HEALTH V. HELLERSTEDT, Nebraska Law Review 96: 577 (2018) FACING THE FACTS: THE NEW ERA OF ABORTION CONFLICT AFTER WHOLE WOMAN’S HEALTH, Wake Forest Law Review 52:231 (2018) LIBERTY AND THE POLITICS OF BALANCE: THE UNDUE-BURDEN TEST AFTER WHOLE WOMAN’S HEALTH V. HELLERSTEDT, Harvard Civil-Rights Civil-Liberties Review 52:421 (2017) SUBSTANTIAL UNCERTAINTY: WHOLE WOMAN’S HEALTH V. HELLERSTEDT AND THE FUTURE OF ABORTION LAW, Supreme Court Review 2016: 77 (2017) THE DISABILITY POLITICS OF ABORTION, Utah Law Review 2017: 587 (2017) REPRODUCING RIGHTS: RETHINKING THE COSTS OF CONSTITUTIONAL DISCOURSE, Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 28: 103 (2016) 2 PERCEIVING ORIENTATION: DEFINING SEXUALITY AFTER OBGERGEFELL, Duke Journal of Gender Law &Policy 23: 223 (2016) THE CONSERVATIVE MAGNA CARTA, North Carolina Law Review 94:1653 (2016) CHOICE AT WORK: YOUNG V. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION, AND REPRODUCTIVE LIBERTY, Denver University Law Review 93:219 (2015) THE (NON-) RIGHT TO SEX, University of Miami Law Review 69:631 (2015) IDENTITY CONTESTS: LITIGATION AND THE MEANING OF SOCIAL-MOVEMENT CAUSES, University of Colorado Law Review 86: 1274 (2015) ORIGINALISM TALK: A LEGAL HISTORY, Brigham Young University Law Review 2014: 869 (2015) BOOK REVIEW: ESTELLE B. FREEDMAN, REDEFINING RAPE: SEXUAL VIOLENCE IN THE ERA OF SUFFRAGE AND SEGREGATION, Law and History Review 33: 251 (2015) ABORTION AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT (NOT) TO PROCREATE, University of Richmond Law Review 48: 1263 (2014) THE PRICE OF PRIVACY, 1973 TO THE PRESENT, Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 37: 285 (2014) BEYOND BACKLASH: LEGAL HISTORY, POLARIZATION, AND ROE V. WADE, Washington and Lee Law Review 71: 969 (2014) ROE’S RACE: THE SUPREME COURT, POPULATION CONTROL, AND REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 25:1 (lead article; 2013) WOMEN’S RIGHTS ON THE RIGHT: THE HISTORY AND STAKES OF MODERN PRO-LIFE FEMINISM, Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law, and Justice 28:232 (2013) GRASSROOTS ORIGINALISM: JUDICIAL ACTIVISM ARGUMENTS, THE ABORTION DEBATE, AND THE POLITICS OF JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY, University of Louisville Law Review 51: 201(2013) AN INCOMPLETE REVOLUTION: FEMINISTS AND THE LEGACY OF MARITAL-PROPERTY REFORM, Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 19: 259 (Lead Article; 2013) SEXING HARRIS: THE LAW AND POLITICS OF THE MOVEMENT TO DEFUND PLANNED PARENTHOOD, Buffalo Law Review 60: 701 (2012) BOOK REVIEW: MARC STEIN, SEXUAL INJUSTICE: SUPREME COURT DECISIONS FROM GRISWOLD TO ROE, Law and History Review 30:279 (2012) THE TERMS OF THE DEBATE: LITIGATION, ARGUMENTATIVE STRATEGIES, AND COALITIONS IN THE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE STRUGGLE, Florida State University Law Review 39:467 (2012) THE POSSIBILITY OF COMPROMISE: ANTIABORTION MODERATES AFTER ROE V. WADE, 1973-1980, Chicago-Kent Law Review 87:571 (2012) THE BONDS THAT TIE: THE POLITICS OF MOTHERHOOD AND THE FUTURE OF ABORTION RIGHTS, Texas Journal of Women and the Law 21:47 (2011); selected for republication in WOMEN AND THE LAW (West, 2012) EDELIN: THE REMAKING OF THE HEADLINE ABORTION TRIAL, Saint Louis University Law Journal 55: 1379 (2011) 3 FRAMING CHANGE: CAUSE LAWYERING, CONSTITUTIONAL DECISIONS, AND SOCIAL CHANGE, Marquette Law Review 94:263 (2010) WAYS TO CHANGE: A REEVALUATION OF ARTICLE V CAMPAIGNS AND LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONALISM, Brigham Young University Law Review 2009:969 (2009) THE FRAMING OF A RIGHT TO CHOOSE: ROE V. WADE AND THE CHANGING DEBATE ON ABORTION LAW, Law and History Review 27:281 (2009) REINVENTING EUGENICS: REPRODUCTIVE CHOICE AND LAW REFORM AFTER WORLD WAR II, Cardozo Journal of Law and Gender 14:319 (2008) EUGENIC FEMINISM: MENTAL HYGIENE, THE WOMEN’S MOVEMENT, AND THE CAMPAIGN FOR EUGENIC LEGAL REFORM, 1900-1935, Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 31:211 (2008) SELECT OP-EDS AND POPULAR WRITINGS HOW THE ANTI-ABORTION USED THE PROGRESSIVE PLAYBOOK TO ATTACK ROE V. WADE, Politico, June 13, 2021(with Robert Tsai) THE ABORTION FIGHT HAS NEVER BEEN ABOUT JUST ROE V. WADE, Atlantic, May 20, 2021 ABORTION IS LEGAL UNTIL A FETUS IS VIABLE. WILL THE SUPREME COURT CHANGE THAT? Washington Post, May 18, 2021 THIS COULD BE THE CASE THAT TAKES DOWN ROE V. WADE, CNN, May 18, 2021 ARKANSAS ABORTION BAN ISN’T A LAW. IT’S A MESSAGE, CNN, March 11, 2021 SOUTH CAROLINA SHOWS WHERE THE ANTIABORTION MOVEMENT IS HEADED, New York Times, March 3, 2021 HOW RAPHAEL WARNOCK CAME TO BE AN ABORTION-RIGHTS OUTLIER, Atlantic, December 29, 2020 ABORTION POLITICS POLARIZED BEFORE ROE. WHEN IT’S GONE, THE FIGHTING WON’T STOP, Washington Post, October 23, 2020 THE SECRET CODE OF THE AMY CONEY BARRETT HEARING, Atlantic, October 14, 2020 WITH A CONSERVATIVE COURT, ABORTION FOES COULD END ROE—AND GO EVEN FURTHER, Washington Post, September 23, 2020 A DANGEROUS MOMENT FOR THE COURT, Atlantic, September 21, 2020 HOW GINSBURG MADE THE LAW FAIRER FOR EVERY WOMAN, CNN, September 19, 2020 HOW THE SUPREME COURT COULD OVERTURN ROE—ALL WHILE CLAIMING TO RESPECT PRECEDENT, Washington Post, July 1, 2020 SOCIAL CONSERVATIVES ARE LEARNING ALL THE WRONG LESSONS FROM TRUMP, Atlantic, June 30, 2020 HOW NOT TO OUTLAW ABORTION, New York Times, June 29, 2020 AFTER SUPREME COURT DEFEAT, ABORTION FOES ARE AT A CROSSROADS, CNN, June 29, 2020 4 WHAT NORMA MCCORVEY BELIEVES MATTERS, Atlantic, May 31, 2020 THE NARROW DEFINITION OF “PRO-LIFE” IS FUELING DISREGARD FOR LIVES DURING COVID-19, Washington Post, May 1, 2020 THE HEARTBEAT BILLS WERE NEVER THE REAL THREAT TO ABORTION RIGHTS, New York Times, March 3, 2020 SUPREME COURT WILL CONSIDER WHETHER STATES CAN ‘PROTECT’ WOMEN FROM ABORTION. WHAT’S BEHIND THAT ARGUMENT?, Washington Post, March 3, 2020 DOES ABORTION HURT WOMEN? A SUBTLE NEW ATTACK ON ABORTION IS ARRIVING AT THE SUPREME COURT, Newsweek, March 2, 2020 THE END OF THE RAPE AND INCEST EXCEPTION, New York Times, Jun. 11, 2019 ABORTION OPPONENTS THINK THEY’RE WINNING. HAVE THEY SET THEMSELVES UP TO FAIL?, New York Times, May 15, 2019 WHAT CLARENCE THOMAS GETS WRONG ABOUT THE TIES BETWEEN ABORTION AND EUGENICS, Washington