Andrews University Digital Commons @ Andrews University Dissertation Projects DMin Graduate Research 2009 Creating A Relational Model of Evangelism in the Texas Conference John L. DuBosque Jr. Andrews University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dmin Part of the Practical Theology Commons Recommended Citation DuBosque, John L. Jr., "Creating A Relational Model of Evangelism in the Texas Conference" (2009). Dissertation Projects DMin. 479. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/dmin/479 This Project Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research at Digital Commons @ Andrews University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertation Projects DMin by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Andrews University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT CREATING A RELATIONAL MODEL OF EVANGELISM IN THE TEXAS CONFERENCE by John L. DuBosque, Jr. Adviser: David Merling ABSTRACT OF GRADUATE STUDENT RESEARCH Project Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary Title: CREATING A RELATIONAL MODEL OF EVANGELISM IN THE TEXAS CONFERENCE Name of Researcher: John L. DuBosque Jr. Name and degree of faculty adviser: David Merling, Ph.D. Date completed: May 2009 Problem Seventh-day Adventist evangelism has attracted fewer postmodern Generations X and Y persons in the recent past due to a lack of understanding subgroup culture and the church’s tendency to accommodate only didactic preaching in a public evangelistic series. Complicating transformation are some Builders and Boomers who are resistive of the needed deep changes in public evangelism ministry which includes small groups. Researched principles that could readily be applied without alienating the older generations had to be field tested in six evangelistic campaigns in order to determine if success could be obtained in reaching Generations X and Y. Method Three structural paradigms were found to be present in every model that deals with change. These change model paradigms are the Technical, Transactional, and Transformational. Galatians 5 exhibits the biblical importance of developing a relational model in evangelism change theory. Consequently, the literature review, not only labeled the existing paradigms, but demonstrated eight specific action steps that bridged the reluctance toward change amongst the older and financially supportive generations. Paradigms involving change were found to be useful information tools but could not accomplish transformation without action steps. The action steps were carried out in a six evangelistic campaign test model. The model was to be highly visible so as to be understood by the various committees in the local churches. Local committees within the church were intentionally made up of both Builders/Boomers and Generations X and Y in order to keep the overall goal of reaching post modems visible. The model also included broad-based action teams that were the decision makers for the evangelism event in each locality. An evangelistic staff change which was oriented toward the younger generation took place about midway in the evangelistic field test model. The action steps included a pre-evangelistic campaign dinner at one of the finest restaurants available for known non Seventh-day Adventist guests. The intention of the dinner was to initiate a friendship role between the evangelistic team, the church, and known guests who were not yet members. Friendship oriented galaxy groups led by a Seventh-day Adventist team leader were formed during the regularly scheduled meetings to serve as discussion classes immediately following each evangelistic sermon. Results As planned, no abrupt changes took place in the field testing because deep change requires incremental forward movement toward transformation. As the field model slowly developed over a period of more than a year in six different locations, the median average age in attendance each evening dropped to a younger age, even though there were variables due to location and advertizing. In drawing subgroup Generation Y toward the evangelistic meetings, the parents of Generation Y known as leading Generation X were attracted to Seventh-day Adventist evangelism because they had to bring their children. The Galaxy groups also became the local church’s ongoing evangelism follow­ up after the hosted campaign left town. Conclusions The churches that hosted the campaigns in the test model and beyond have benefited by relational evangelism practices. When the model became visible enough to be practical, the Builders and Boomers began to support relational evangelism and many of them joined the friendship galaxy groups. Graffiti Evangelism developed amongst Generation Y and became a younger galaxy sub group, as was expected stemming from the research. By shortening didactic preaching and emphasizing relational evangelism in the discussion galaxy groups that followed each meeting, both Builders/Boomers and Generations X and Y found themselves in friendship circles that resembled subculture trends in general. The visible model that was developed from the existing paradigms and action steps found in the literature became a workable product in the Seventh-day Adventist evangelism process. Andrews University Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary CREATING A RELATIONAL MODEL OF EVANGELISM IN THE TEXAS CONFERENCE A Project Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Ministry by John L. DuBosque, Jr. May 2009 © Copyright by John L. DuBosque, Jr. 2009 All Rights Reserved CREATING A RELATIONAL MODEL OF EVANGELISM IN THE TEXAS CONFERENCE A project report presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Ministry by John L. DuBosque, Jr. APPROVAL BY THE COMMITTEE: Bruce Bauer Dean, SDA Theological Seminary J. H. Denis Fortin Date approved TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................... vii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION................................................................................. 1 The Task of the Project.................................................................... 1 Purpose of the Project .................................................................... 1 Justification for the Project.............................................................. 3 Definitions of Terms............. 4 Limitations of the Project................................................................ 6 Description of the Project Process .................................................. 9 II. THE GALATIANS 5 CHANGE THEORY MODEL THAT SUPPORTS A CHANGE TOWARD RELATIONAL EVANGELISM.................... 11 Structured Principles in the Galatians Model Toward Change Theory ......................... 11 Context of Existing Structure.................................................... 13 Modem Change M odel.............................................................. 14 First Change Model: From Bondage to Liberty, an Act of Faith. 17 The Existing Structure of the Law of Bondage ........................ 19 Circumcision: Empty Symbol .................................................... 19 Justification By Law: Fall From Grace .................................... 20 The Cross Ceases: No Transactional Change Expected ............ 23 Liberty: Structure to be Desired................................................ 25 Faith: Liberty in C hrist.............................................................. 25 Transformational Structure: Change Theory M odel.................. 27 Existing Structure: Works of the Flesh...................................... 28 Transactional Faith Accomplishes Transformation .................. 29 Fruits of the Spirit: Desired Stmctural Model .......................... 31 The Second Change Model: Accomplished by the First Model . 33 Organized Principles of Change: Critical to Evangelism .......... 33 Chapter Summary............................................................................ 34 III. ' THE ELEMENTAL RELATIONAL INFLUENCE IN CHANGE THEORY: A LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................ 35 Robert E. Quinn: “Deep Change” .................................... ............... 35 iii Using Structure to Achieve Transformational Goals................ 37 The Technical Individual Contributor ...................................... 38 Shaping a Transactional Approach in Relational Change Theory ........................................... 40 Caution Is Needed When Using Secular Models to Transact Change .............................. ............. .................................. 41 Transactional Team Building.................................................... 42 Transactional Influence within Organizational Politics............ 44 Transacting Deep Change without Over-Permissiveness.......... 46 Transactional Care Impresses Financial Supporters.................. 47 The Transformational Cycle...................................................... 48 Quinn’s Graphic Illustration...................................................... 49 Transformational Team Training Phase .................................... 49 Bridge Building During the Transformational Training Phase . 51 Managing Transformational Responsibility .............................. 52 Transformational Management Allows Participation................ 53 A Final Observation .................................................................. 55 John P. Kotter: Leading Change ....................