Answers to Chapter 2 Problems

Answers to Chapter 2 Problems

Answers To Chapter 2 Problems. 1. (a) Substitution at a 3° alkyl halide rarely proceeds by an SN2 mechanism, unless the reaction is intra- molecular. In this case SN2 is even less likely because of the highly hindered nature of the electrophile and the fact that the electrophilic C is unlikely to want to expand its bond angles from 109° to 120° on proceeding through the SN2 transition state. The other possibility in this case is SRN1, which is reasonable given the heavy atom nucleophile and the requirement of light. Initiation: hν PhS– [PhS–]* Me Me Me Me – Cl Cl [PhS ]* + PhS + Br Br Me Me Me Me Propagation: Me Me Me Me Cl Cl + Br– Br Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Cl Cl + –SPh SPh Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Cl Cl Cl Cl + + SPh Br SPh Br Me Me Me Me Me Me Me Me (b) The 1° halide will definitely undergo substitution by an SN2 mechanism. Indene is a pretty good acid (pKa≈ 19) due to aromatic stabilization of the anion. After deprotonation with BuLi, it attacks the electro- philic C by SN2. A second equivalent of indenyl anion then redeprotonates the indenyl group of the product, allowing a second, intramolecular SN2 reaction to proceed to give the observed product. 2.1 2.2 H H H O Li Bu Cl Cl O O O O H O Cl O Cl O (c) This 3°, uninvertable halide cannot undergo SN2 substitution. An elimination–addition mechanism is unlikely because the base is not terribly strong and the neighboring C–H bonds are not parallel to the C–I 3 bond. The most likely possibility is SRN1. C(sp )–I bonds are good substrates for SRN1 reactions. The II III FeCl2 is a one-electron reducing agent (Fe → Fe ) that acts as an initiator. Initiation: FeCl2 + + FeCl2 I I Propagation: + I– I O– O + H Ph Ph H H H O Ph + I H H O + I Ph 2.3 (d) Substitution on arenes with strongly electron-withdrawing groups usually takes place by an – addition–elimination mechanism. In this case the leaving group is nitrite, NO2. NO2 NO2 NO2 CN – CN CN OMe – + NO2 NO NO 2 OMe 2 OMe H H H (e) The first product results from halogen–metal exchange. The mechanism of halogen–metal exchange is not well understood. It may proceed by SN2 substitution at Br by the nucleophilic C, or it may involve electron transfer steps. (See Chapter 5.) Br Li Li n-Bu ≡ + Br n-Bu Small amounts of aromatic substitution product are often formed during halogen–metal exchange. Many mechanisms are possible. • The major product PhLi could react with the by-product n-BuBr in an SN2 reaction. • Addition–elimination could occur. PhBr is not an electrophilic arene, but the very high nucleo- philicity of n-BuLi may compensate. • An SRN1 reaction could occur. • Elimination–addition (benzyne mechanism) could occur. Certain experiments would help to rule these possibilities in or out. • Elimination–addition goes through a benzyne intermediate, and the nucleophile can add to either benzyne C, so both 3- and 4-bromotoluene should give mixtures of products if this mechanism is operative. • Addition–elimination would accelerate (compared to halogen–metal exchange) with electron-with- drawing groups on the ring and decelerate with electron-donating groups on the ring. • If the SN2 mechanism is operative, changing n-BuLi to s-BuLi would reduce the amount of substi- 2.4 tution product a lot, and changing it to CH3Li would increase it. If the SRN1 mechanism is operative, changing n-BuLi to s-BuLi would not change the amount of substitution much, and changing it to CH3Li would reduce it a lot. (f) Acyl chlorides can undergo substitution by two mechanisms: addition–elimination or elimination–addition (ketene mechanism). In this case, elimination–addition can’t occur because there are no α H’s. The mechanism must be addition–elimination. O Cl O– O NEt O H 3 O Ph Cl O Ph O Ph (g) This acyl chloride is particularly prone to elimination because of the acidicity of the benzylic H’s. Addition–elimination can’t be ruled out, but elimination–addition is more likely. O O– O O Ph NEt3 Ph Ph R Ph R Cl O O H H H H H H NEt3 – H NEt3 RO H RO (h) The reaction proceeds by an SN2 mechanism. The reaction has a very low entropy of activation, so it proceeds despite the loss of aromaticity. The product is a model of the antitumor agent duocarmycin. DNA reacts with duocarmycin by attacking the CH2 group of the cyclopropane ring in an SN2 reaction. I I I I I NaH HO N –O N O N (i) This nucleophilic substitution reaction at aromatic C(sp2) can proceed by addition–elimination, elimi- nation–addition, or SRN1. In this case, addition–elimination is low in energy because of the strong 2.5 stabilization of the Meisenheimer complex by aromaticity of the five-membered ring. Cl Cl OEt OEt –OEt (j) The mechanism cannot be SN2 because of the 3° alkyl electrophile. The most likely mechanism is SRN1, which proceeds through radical anions. The best resonance structure of the radical anion of the starting material puts the odd electron in the aromatic ring, and the best resonance structure of the radical anion of the product puts the odd electron on S, but in both cases it is more convenient to draw the resonance structure in which there is a three-electron, two-center bond. Initiation: NC CN NC CN t-Bu Et + PhS– t-Bu Et + PhS OAr OAr Propagation: NC CN NC CN t-Bu Et t-Bu Et + –OAr OAr NC CN NC CN t-Bu Et + –SPh t-Bu Et SPh NC CN NC CN t-Bu Et + t-Bu Et SPh OAr NC CN NC CN t-Bu Et + t-Bu Et SPh OAr 2.6 (k) Substitution at aromatic C(sp2) can occur by one of three mechanisms. Addition–elimination requires that the ring be substituted with electron-withdrawing groups. Elimination–addition requires very strong – bases like NH2 . The third mechanism, SRN1, is operative here; the light is a clue that radicals are involved. Initiation: O– O Br + Br + i-Pr i-Pr Propagation: Br + Br– O– O + i-Pr i-Pr O O + Br + Br i-Pr i-Pr (l) The mechanism clearly cannot be SN2, because substitution occurs with retention of configuration. – Two sequential SN2 reactions are a possibility, but unlikely, because OAc is a lousy leaving group in SN2 reactions. It is more likely that an elimination–addition mechanism operates. The AcO group is α to N, and the lone pair on N weakens and lengthens the C–O bond, making it prone to leave to give an N-acyl- iminium ion. The AcO– deprotonates the ketoester to give an enolate, which adds to the electrophilic C=N π bond from the less hindered face (opposite from the substituent on C2 of the lactam), giving a trans product as observed. OTBS OTBS H H H H OAc H3C H3C N N O H O H 2.7 O H O – O H H OAc H H nucleophile has N attacked less CO2R CO2R N H hindered (top) RO2C TBSO O H face of π bond TBSO O CH3 CH3 – 2. (a) Cyanide can act as a nucleophile toward the bromoester, displacing one Br in an SN2 reaction to – give a cyanoacetate. The cyanoacetate (pKa = 9) is deprotonated by another equivalent of CN (pKb = 9) to give an enolate that attacks the other bromoester to give the product. NC CO2Et EtO C CO Et – – 2 2 CN H CN H H H Br Br Br CO2Et NC CO2Et CN CO Et 2 deprotonation, reprotonation on H other side can epimerize this center to more stable diastereomer CO2Et H Br CO2Et – (b) The acyl chloride is a potent electrophile and N3 is a nucleophile, so the first part of the reaction involves addition–elimination to make the acyl azide. Upon heating, the Ph–CO bond breaks and a Ph–N bond forms. This suggests a 1,2-shift, promoted by loss of N2. O –O Cl O N N N N N N N Ph Cl Ph N Ph N O O N N Δ N N N C O Ph N Ph N Ph 2.8 (c) Make: C1–C5, C1–C5', C3–C5. Break: C5–OEt (twice), C5'–OEt (once). Each substitution at C(sp2) must occur by addition–elimination. The particular order of acylation events can vary from the answer given here. O 4 5' H C O 3 3 2 CO2Et 5 5' NaOEt 1 5 + 2 EtO2CCO2Et 5 H3C 3 1 CH O 4 2 3 O 5' OH O O– O –OEt H3C H3C OEt CH3 CH3 EtO H H H O O O O H H H H C H C H C H 3 3 – 3 CH3 CH3 OEt C H OEt H –O O O O O –O EtO OEt OEt OEt – O O O –O OEt H O H3C H H3C H H3C OEt C –OEt C H H OEt O OEt EtO OEt O HO HO O HO OEt O O O O O– O O O H3C OEt H3C OEt H3C –OEt OEt H H H OEt O OEt O H HO HO HO OEt O O O O– O O O H O H3C H3C CO Et H3C CO Et OEt –OEt 2 2 H EtO H O O HO O O O – O H O OH 2.9 (d) Either the α or the γ carbon of the Grignard reagent can attack the nitrile.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    30 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us