Inspector's Report ABP300446-17

Inspector's Report ABP300446-17

Inspector’s Report ABP300446-17 Development Demolition of former post office garage/depot and the construction of a new office building with all ancillary works. Location Sandwith Street Upper, Dublin 2. Planning Authority Dublin City Council. Planning Authority Reg. Ref. 4177/16. Applicant Rails Investment Limited (in Trust). Type of Application Permission. Planning Authority Decision Refuse. Type of Appeal First Party -v- Refusal. Appellant Rails Investment Limited (in trust). Observers (i) Geraldine Byrne, (ii) Zonda Properties Limited, (iii) Carmel McCormack, (iv) Transport Infrastructure Ireland, (v) Irish Rail. Date of Site Inspection 6th April, 2018. Inspector Paul Caprani. ABP300446-17 Inspector’s Report Page 1 of 26 Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Site Location and Description .............................................................................. 3 3.0 Proposed Development ....................................................................................... 4 4.0 Planning Authority Assessment ........................................................................... 5 5.0 Additional Information Response ....................................................................... 10 6.0 Planning History ................................................................................................. 12 7.0 Grounds of Appeal ............................................................................................. 12 8.0 Appeal Responses ............................................................................................. 16 9.0 Observations...................................................................................................... 16 10.0 Development Plan Provision ....................................................................... 19 11.0 Planning Assessment .................................................................................. 20 12.0 Appropriate Assessment ............................................................................. 25 13.0 Decision ...................................................................................................... 25 14.0 Reasons and Considerations ...................................................................... 26 ABP300446-17 Inspector’s Report Page 2 of 26 1.0 Introduction ABP300446-17 relates to a first party appeal against the decision of Dublin City Council to refuse planning permission for the demolition of a former post office garage/depot and the construction of a 4-7 storey over basement office building together with ancillary areas at Sandwith Street Upper, Dublin 2. Dublin City Council in a single reason for refusal states that the subject site is located on the indicative alignment of the Dart Underground and it is considered that the development proposed is premature pending agreements on the requirements of the delivery Dart Underground and as such the proposal would contravene Policy MT4 of the 2016 Dublin City Development Plan. 2.0 Site Location and Description 2.1. The appeal site is located in the south-east periphery of Dublin City Centre. It is approximately 1 kilometre east of College Green and 1 kilometre south-east of O’Connell Bridge. The site is bounded to the west by Sandwith Street Upper, to the south by Boyne Street and to the north by elevated railway tracks to the immediate east of Pearse Street Station. The rear gardens/yards of a row of 7 two-storey Victorian brown bricked terraced dwellings which front directly onto Erne Street to the east. The blocks in the vicinity of the subject site have accommodated more recent infill development mainly in the form of office and other commercial development ranging from c. 4 to 6 storeys in height. The wider area in the vicinity of the site is on the whole characterised with small scale traditional 1 and 2 storey urban cottage type development dating from the late 19th century and more recent office development constructed from the 1970s onwards. 2.2. The site itself comprises of the entire block between Sandwith Street Upper, Boyne Street and Erne Street with the exception of the two storey Victorian dwellings and rear gardens fronting onto Erne Street Upper, and a small single storey structure which appears to be used as storage at present (Nos. 38 to 39 Boyne Street) which is located at the corner of Sandwith Street and Boyne Street. ABP300446-17 Inspector’s Report Page 3 of 26 2.3. The site itself accommodates a building which was previously used as a post office storage facility. This building comprises of a two storey structure probably dating from the mid-20th century which incorporates a brown brick elevation finish with granite plinths and a granite stringcourse between the first and second storey. A series of narrow windows at ground floor level run along the Sandwith Street elevation. The windows are interspersed with a series of three roller shutter doors. Pay and display parking is located on the streets contiguous to the subject site. 3.0 Proposed Development The existing post offices stores on site amounting to 1,596 square metres are to be demolished. It is proposed to be replaced with a new five storey office structure on the subject site. Originally it was proposed to construct a 7-storey over basement office block on the subject side, however this was reduced in size as a result of an additional information request from Dublin City Council. At ground floor level it is proposed to incorporate a new reception area with entrance from Sandwith Street Upper. The ground floor is also to incorporate a new commercial unit to the rear of the building (685 square metres) together with switch rooms, substations and refuse area. The ground floor area is also to accommodate circulation space in AHU and boiler unit and ancillary accommodation including WCs and showers. The building line is to front directly onto Sandwith Street and is to be set back from the northern boundary and eastern boundary. A circulation area is provided to the rear of the building and five car parking spaces are to be provided adjacent to a vehicular entrance onto Boyne Street to the south. The first, second, third and fourth floors are to comprise of open plan office area set out around a central core area within the building providing toilets and lift accommodation as well as a central stairwell providing access to each of the floors. Typically, each of the floors would accommodate between 1,330 square metres (first floor level) down to 886 square metres (fourth floor level). The building is set back at fourth floor level along the eastern elevation overlooking the rear of the dwellings facing onto Erne Street Upper. The building rises to an overall height of 21.2 metres. The bottom three floors obstensively comprise of brick cladding with transparent glass while the upper two floors comprise of an external cladding comprising of opaque glass interspersed with transparent glass. A terraced area is provided at four floor level on ABP300446-17 Inspector’s Report Page 4 of 26 the eastern elevation of the building. The total gross floor area of the proposal under the original drawing submitted was 10,187 square metres. Under the original drawings submitted with the planning application it was proposed to construct a seven storey over basement building. The gross floor area of the building by way of additional information was reduced from 10,187 square metres to 6,163 square metres. 4.0 Planning Authority Assessment 4.1. The planning application was lodged with Dublin City Council on 22nd November 2016. In its decision dated 17th November 2017, Dublin City Council issued notification to refuse planning permission for a single reason which is set out in full below. “Map J of the Dublin City Development Plan 2016 – 2022 illustrates the indicative alignment of the Dart Underground through the application site. Policy MT4 of the 2016 Dublin City Development Plan seeks “to promote and facilitate the provision of Metro all heavy elements of the Dart expansion programme including Dart Underground (railway interconnector), the electrification of existing lines, the expansion of LUAS and improvements to the bus network in order to achieve strategic transport objectives. The submission on the application by the Dart Underground Office outlines that the lands are necessary for the delivery of the Dart Underground and the development as proposed has the potential to compromise the integrity of the Dart Underground. The development as proposed therefore is considered premature pending agreement on the requirements for a Dart Underground and would contravene Policy MT4 of the 2016 Dublin City Development Plan and is therefore contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area”. 4.2. Documentation Submitted with the Application The following documentation was submitted with the application. Planning Report prepared by McGill Planning Limited 4.2.1. The report sets out the site context and notes that the site is located within an area characterised by a ‘mish-mash’ of architectural styles. It also sets out the planning policy context, making reference to the zoning and development plan standards as ABP300446-17 Inspector’s Report Page 5 of 26 they relate to the site and various policies contained in the development plan which are relevant to the proposal before the Board. It also highlights the presence of taller buildings (five to seven storeys) in the wider site

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    26 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us