2009 Percy Julian Award Lecture

2009 Percy Julian Award Lecture

Catalytic Applications for Enhanced Production of Transportation Fuels Soni O. Oyekan Reforming & Isom Technologist Marathon Oil 2009 NOBCChE Percy L. Julian Lecture April 14, 2009 Lecture Outline • Introduction and Acknowledgement • Overview of Oil Refining Processes • Hydroprocessing and Hydrogen • Catalytic Reforming Process • Staged Platinum/Rhenium Catalysts • Two Stage Reduction of Platinum Catalysts • Summary Introduction & Acknowledgements • Dr. Percy L. Julian’s pioneering work led to foam, paint, hormones and cortisone • ExxonMobil and George Swan for work leading to US Patent 4,436,612 and 8 other patents in late 1970s in Baton Rouge, LA • Engelhard for oil refining catalyst work in the 1980s in Edison, NJ • Marathon for opportunities to apply my expertise to oil refining processes in the past 10 years and support of my professional organization activities • Catalytic studies were conducted between 1977 and 1984 and the ideas have been incorporated into hundreds of catalytic reformers Overview of Oil Refining Processes Oil Refiners 6-3-2-1 Crack Spread ▪ 6-3-2-1 Crude Oil Crack Spread = {(Revenue from 3 barrels of gasoline + 2 barrels of diesel + 1 barrel of asphalt) – (Cost of 6 barrels of crude oil)}/6 ▪ 3-2-1 Crude Oil Crack Spreads are based on gasoline & diesel only ! ! GASOLINE DIESEL ASPHALT CRUDE OIL A Simplified Refinery Flow Diagram Sulfur Gas Sulfur Recovery Plant LPG, C3= Catalytic Hydrogen Atm NHT Reformer Crude Unit Gasoline Oil Blending Gasoline FCCU Distillate DHT Vac Fuels Unit H/C Diesel Fuels Coker Unit Coke Asphalt Marathon Garyville CCR Platformer Hydroprocessing and Hydrogen A Typical Hydrotreater Flow Diagram Hydroprocessing Reactions ✓ Sulfur, Nitrogen and Oxygenates Removal – Hydrodesulfurization is the major reaction in hydroprocessing – Hydrodenitrogenation is essential in FCC and Hydrocracker feed pre-treatment – Hydrodeoxygenation is not common, except in the processing of synthetic (coal, shale) oils and with rerun streams (MTBE, EtOH) ✓ Olefins and Aromatics Saturation – Olefin saturation for product stability and color – Aromatic saturation for solvents, transportation fuels production and FCC feed pretreatment. ✓ Hydrocracking like FCC is used for conversion of gas oils to gasoline, diesel, heating oil and jet fuel ✓ Hydroprocessing reactions consume significant amounts of hydrogen Refinery Process H2 Consumption H2 consumption is a function of: ▪ Process type ▪ Feed boiling range LSR H/T ▪ Composition NHT ▪ Sulfur DHT LP GO H/T ▪ Nitrogen DHT HP ▪ Metals H/C ▪ Oxygenates ▪ Unit pressure ▪ Unit temperature ! Avg. H2 price ~ $4/MSCF H2 consumption for a 70 MBPD Hydrocracker ~ $220 MM/yr Catalytic Reforming Processes Catalytic Naphtha Reforming Basics • Upgrade the octane of a naphtha feed to produce – High octane gasoline blending component – Hydrogen – Aromatics • Platinum reforming catalysts – Dual functionality • Hydrogenation/dehydrogenation • Acidic/isomerization • Pt/Al2O3/Cl, Pt/Re/Al2O3/Cl, Pt/Sn/Al2O3/Cl Catalytic Naphtha Reforming Basics • Hydrotreated Naphtha Feed – Sulfur < 0.3 wppm – Nitrogen < 0.2 wppm – Metals < 10 ppb – Paraffins, naphthenes and aromatics – Carbon range of C6 to C11 • Typical Process Conditions – 35 to 300 psig, 900 to 1000 F, LHSV 1.0 to 4.0, – H2/HC molar ratio of 1.5 to 6 • Principal Reactions – Naphthenes dehydrogenation – Naphthenes isomerization – Paraffin dehydrocyclization – Paraffin hydrocracking – Hydrodealkylation of aromatics – Paraffin hydogenolysis Catalytic Reforming Reactions Reference: UOP Platforming Paraffin Dehydrocyclization C2H5 M/A C2H5 C-C-C-C-C-C-C M/A Heptane, 0 RON C2H5 M Coke A M metal sites A A acid site CH3 CH3 + 4H2 M Toluene, 120 RON Adapted from G. A Mills, H. Heinemann, T. H. Milliken and A. G. Oblad, Ind. Eng. Chem. 45, 134 (1953) Semi Regen & CCR Reformers Staged Platinum/Rhenium Catalysts Platinum/Rhenium Catalysis • First assignment in Exxon was to determine the mode of promotion of Rhenium in Pt/Re catalysts • Fundamental Pt/Re catalysis and naphtha reforming process • Cleaned a 4 reactor Hydrotreating catalyst sulfiding unit for “clean sulfur” platinum/rhenium naphtha reforming studies • Isopropyl alcohol used in cleaning the unit in 8 weeks! • 4 reactors shared a common heater • Developed close working relationship with other Exxon researchers and surface characterization specialists Catalyst Test Program • Assess rhenium effects at various rhenium concentrations • Catalysts with varying rhenium content on a constant Pt catalyst – 0.3 %Pt/0.3 %Re, O.3 % Pt/0.6 % Re, relative Re/Pt ratios – 0.3 % Pt/Al2O3, 0.3 % Re/Al2O3, • Activate catalysts and characterize for start of run (SOR) coke, chloride and sulfur • Conduct test runs in a common sand bath heater with four separate reactor and product separation systems • Use the same operating conditions and naphtha feed – 935 F, 200 psig, 5000 SCF/B H2/HC • Obtain C5+, H2 and light gases (C1 – C4) yields • Characterize spent catalysts for coke, chloride and sulfur • Conduct model compound reforming studies with Heptane and methyl cyclopentane. Isothermal Unit Data for Pt/Re Catalysts Feed: P, 69.1 vol. %; N + A, 30.9, vol. % Rel C5+, Catalyst EOR EOR ! Re vol. % Activity Coke Sulfur Process Conditions; 935 F, 200 psig, H2 rate of 5000 SCF/B 1.0 70.8 85.0 8.4 0.03 ! Rel. Re = wt % Re/wt % Pt in catalyst 1.5 71.2 83.0 9.2 0.05 Test Summary 2.0 70.7 81.0 8.5 0.07 ▪ Lower coke make with higher Rhenium ▪ Lower C5+ and H2 yields 2.7 70.3 95.0 7.3 0.12 ▪ Higher sulfur retention ▪ Higher activities with Rhenium content 3.9 69.9 109.0 7.3 0.14 ▪ Different H/C ratios for the coke ▪ Shift in aromatics to BTX ! ! Commercial Simulation Unit Data Cat A 0.3 % Pt/0.3 % Re Catalyst Cat A Cat B Delta Cat B 0.3 % Pt/0.6 % Re Activity No. 72.0 96.0 +24 ! Cat B = Rel 2 ! C5+, vol. 72.0 69.3 -2.7 Feed: Light Arabian Naphtha % ! Process Conditions: 950 F, 175 psig, 3000 SCF/B, 102 RON ! Test Summary • 2.7 vol. % lower C5+ for B • Lower H2 yield • Higher C1 to C4 gas • Lower coke make Combination/Staged Catalyst Data Catalyst Catalyst A Catalyst A & Delta 0.3 Pt/0.3 Re (A) Catalyst B Activity 77.0 92.0 +15 H 2.26 2.31 +0.05 C1 – C4, wt. % 18.82 17.86 -0.96 C5+ yield, vol. % 74.30 75.50 +1.2 • Production gains for C5+ (gasoline) and H2 • $5+ MM dollars a year for a 40 MBPD Platformer • Introduced staged Pt/Re catalyst systems based on Rel. Re • Combination Pt/Re catalyst systems are now used worldwide • Determined that rhenium promoted platinum catalysis via minimization of steric hindrance for intermediate compounds • Studies led to KX-160, US Patent 4,436,612 and 8 other patents Paraffin Dehydrocyclization C H C H M/A 4 9 M 4 9 C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C-C C4H9 M M metal sites COKE A acid site A A X C3H7 , Where X is CH3, or C2H5 + 4H2 M Rhenium modifies sterically hindered intermediate compounds Two Stage Reduction of Platinum Catalysts Reforming Catalyst Reactivation • Burn coke off spent catalyst – CXHy + (x+y/4) O2 xCO2 + (y/2)H20 ! • Re-disperse agglomerated platinum and promoter metal sites • Reduce platinum and promoter – Manage water evolution – Manage reactions with hydrocarbons – Optimize reduction of platinum and promoter – Manage catalyst chloride loss • Sulfide Pt/Re catalysts to temper hyperactive sites Platinum & Rhenium Reduction PtO2 + 2H2 Pt + 2H2O ! Re2O7 + 7H2 2Re + 7H2O Past work had shown the following: ! • Platinum is reduced at 600 F • Rhenium reduction is not facile and requires temperatures > 1100 F ! Scelza et. al: TPR work shown here ! Hypothesis: Use reduced Platinum to catalyze the reduction of rhenium oxide or a promoter metal oxide Two Stage Reduction Enhances Gasoline and H2 Yields Novel activation Procedure US Patent 4,539,307 Standard 2 Stage Delta ! Red. Red. (1) Reduction at a temp between 600 F and 750 F H2, wt. % 2.44 2.52 +0.08 (2) Nitrogen purge to remove water (3) Another reduction at temp C1, wt. % 1.27 1.18 -0.09 between 900 F and 1000 F ! C2, wt. % 1.81 1.65 -0.16 ! Feed: P/N/A 46.9/37.0/16.1 Process conditions: WHSV 4 C3+C4, wt. 6.87 5.63 -1.24 200 psig, H2/HC 3, 98 % RON C5+, vol. % 82.54 83.77 +1.23 Summary • Pt/Re catalysis work by Soni Oyekan and George Swan led to increased production of hydrogen and gasoline blending components for oil refiners • The Pt/Re studies led to use of terms such as equi-molar, balanced, unbalanced and skewed by technology providers and oil refiners • Two stage reduction of platinum containing catalysts is now used worldwide in over 120 high performance catalytic reformers • Platinum catalyst inventions have enhanced economic benefits for oil refiners due to increased production of hydrogen, gasoline, diesel and jet fuel • My catalytic reforming process contributions have improved understanding of the impact of feed sulfur in naphtha reforming over platinum containing catalysts ! Thank You For Your Time 2005 Marathon Garyville Refinery Sulfur Studies of Platinum Catalysts Bimetallic Catalysts Are Sulfur Sensitive • Gasoline blending component and H2 yields are reduced drastically • Catalyst activity is significantly lowered • Process cycles are shortened for feed sulfur > 0.5 wppm • Sulfur negatively impacts productivity over Pt/Sn catalysts in CCR reformers • Worse for High rhenium Pt/Re catalysts in semi-regenerative reformers • Liquid and vapor phase sulfur guard technologies Platformer Feed Sulfur History Semi Regen & Cyclic: 1948 Pt Catalysts 10 to 20 wppm SR and CCR: 1967 Pt/Re 1970 Pt/Sn < 0.5 wppm Feed 1984 Skewed Pt/Re Sulfur, wppm < 0.2 wppm 1998: CCR & Cyclic Reduce NH4 0.1 wppm Salting Rates Platforming Technology Progression, years Low Feed Sulfur Correlation ▪ Establish a better understanding of feed sulfur in Reformers ! ! • A 4-year pilot plant studies led to feed sulfur correlations for the refining industry ! • Correlations developed for balanced and skewed Pt/Re catalysts ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! AXENS OCTANIZER REFORMER Marathon Garyville Refinery in 2005 Marathon Garyville Hydrocracker in 2009 Coker Drums for Increased Profitability Marathon Garyville Refinery in 2009 Catalytic Reforming Reactor ! ! ! Radial Reactor with Scallops and center pipe or center screen Oil Sands Processing for Energy .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    41 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us