Factorizations of Algebraic Integers, Block Monoids, and Additive Number Theory

Factorizations of Algebraic Integers, Block Monoids, and Additive Number Theory

Factorizations of Algebraic Integers, Block Monoids, and Additive Number Theory Scott Chapman Sam Houston State University October 19, 2017 Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 1 / 31 Prologue This talk is based the paper: [1] P. Baginski and S. T. Chapman, Factorizations of Algebraic Integers, Block Monoids and Additive Number Theory, Amer. Math. Monthly to appear. More information and background on this area can be found in: [2] S. T. Chapman, On the Davenport constant, the cross number and their application in factorization theory, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, 171(1995), 167-190. [3] A. Geroldinger and F. Halter-Koch, Non-unique factorizations. Algebraic, Combinatorial and Analytic Theory, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006. Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 2 / 31 Prologue This talk is based the paper: [1] P. Baginski and S. T. Chapman, Factorizations of Algebraic Integers, Block Monoids and Additive Number Theory, Amer. Math. Monthly to appear. More information and background on this area can be found in: [2] S. T. Chapman, On the Davenport constant, the cross number and their application in factorization theory, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, 171(1995), 167-190. [3] A. Geroldinger and F. Halter-Koch, Non-unique factorizations. Algebraic, Combinatorial and Analytic Theory, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006. Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 2 / 31 Prologue This talk is based the paper: [1] P. Baginski and S. T. Chapman, Factorizations of Algebraic Integers, Block Monoids and Additive Number Theory, Amer. Math. Monthly to appear. More information and background on this area can be found in: [2] S. T. Chapman, On the Davenport constant, the cross number and their application in factorization theory, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Marcel Dekker, 171(1995), 167-190. [3] A. Geroldinger and F. Halter-Koch, Non-unique factorizations. Algebraic, Combinatorial and Analytic Theory, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2006. Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 2 / 31 Motivation Let K = Q(α) be a finite extension of the rationals. Let OK = fα 2 K j f (α) = 0 for some monic f (X ) 2 Z[X ]g be the ring of integers of K. Let I(OK ) represent the set of nonzero ideals of OK and P(OK ) its associated subset of nonzero principal ideals. Fundamental Question If α 2 OK , then how does α factor into irreducible elements of OK ? When do the elements of OK have unique factorization like in Z? Answer: The factorizations of α depend on the factorization of the ideal (α) into the prime ideals of I(OK ). OK is a unique factorization domain exactly when I(OK ) = P(OK ). Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 3 / 31 Motivation Let K = Q(α) be a finite extension of the rationals. Let OK = fα 2 K j f (α) = 0 for some monic f (X ) 2 Z[X ]g be the ring of integers of K. Let I(OK ) represent the set of nonzero ideals of OK and P(OK ) its associated subset of nonzero principal ideals. Fundamental Question If α 2 OK , then how does α factor into irreducible elements of OK ? When do the elements of OK have unique factorization like in Z? Answer: The factorizations of α depend on the factorization of the ideal (α) into the prime ideals of I(OK ). OK is a unique factorization domain exactly when I(OK ) = P(OK ). Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 3 / 31 Motivation Let K = Q(α) be a finite extension of the rationals. Let OK = fα 2 K j f (α) = 0 for some monic f (X ) 2 Z[X ]g be the ring of integers of K. Let I(OK ) represent the set of nonzero ideals of OK and P(OK ) its associated subset of nonzero principal ideals. Fundamental Question If α 2 OK , then how does α factor into irreducible elements of OK ? When do the elements of OK have unique factorization like in Z? Answer: The factorizations of α depend on the factorization of the ideal (α) into the prime ideals of I(OK ). OK is a unique factorization domain exactly when I(OK ) = P(OK ). Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 3 / 31 Motivation Let K = Q(α) be a finite extension of the rationals. Let OK = fα 2 K j f (α) = 0 for some monic f (X ) 2 Z[X ]g be the ring of integers of K. Let I(OK ) represent the set of nonzero ideals of OK and P(OK ) its associated subset of nonzero principal ideals. Fundamental Question If α 2 OK , then how does α factor into irreducible elements of OK ? When do the elements of OK have unique factorization like in Z? Answer: The factorizations of α depend on the factorization of the ideal (α) into the prime ideals of I(OK ). OK is a unique factorization domain exactly when I(OK ) = P(OK ). Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 3 / 31 Motivation Let K = Q(α) be a finite extension of the rationals. Let OK = fα 2 K j f (α) = 0 for some monic f (X ) 2 Z[X ]g be the ring of integers of K. Let I(OK ) represent the set of nonzero ideals of OK and P(OK ) its associated subset of nonzero principal ideals. Fundamental Question If α 2 OK , then how does α factor into irreducible elements of OK ? When do the elements of OK have unique factorization like in Z? Answer: The factorizations of α depend on the factorization of the ideal (α) into the prime ideals of I(OK ). OK is a unique factorization domain exactly when I(OK ) = P(OK ). Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 3 / 31 More Motivation The usual example used in an undergraduate Abstract Algebra Textbook to demonstrate that the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic can fail in an integral domain is: p p 6 = 2 · 3 = (1 + −5)(1 − −5) (1) p in the algebraic number ring Z[ −5]. The actual argument to complete this observation involves showing two things: p p (i) 2; 3; 1 + −5 and 1 − −5 are all irreducible, and p p (ii) 2 (resp. 3) is neither an associate of (1 + −5) nor of (1 −p −5) (this is clear once ±1 are established as the only units of Z[ −5]). Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 4 / 31 More Motivation The usual example used in an undergraduate Abstract Algebra Textbook to demonstrate that the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic can fail in an integral domain is: p p 6 = 2 · 3 = (1 + −5)(1 − −5) (1) p in the algebraic number ring Z[ −5]. The actual argument to complete this observation involves showing two things: p p (i) 2; 3; 1 + −5 and 1 − −5 are all irreducible, and p p (ii) 2 (resp. 3) is neither an associate of (1 + −5) nor of (1 −p −5) (this is clear once ±1 are established as the only units of Z[ −5]). Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 4 / 31 More Motivation The usual example used in an undergraduate Abstract Algebra Textbook to demonstrate that the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic can fail in an integral domain is: p p 6 = 2 · 3 = (1 + −5)(1 − −5) (1) p in the algebraic number ring Z[ −5]. The actual argument to complete this observation involves showing two things: p p (i) 2; 3; 1 + −5 and 1 − −5 are all irreducible, and p p (ii) 2 (resp. 3) is neither an associate of (1 + −5) nor of (1 −p −5) (this is clear once ±1 are established as the only units of Z[ −5]). Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 4 / 31 Motivation p Most books fail to point out to the readers that while Z[ −5] is not a UFD, it does have a rather nice factorization property. p Specifically, if α1; : : : αn; β1; : : : ; βm are irreducible elements of Z[ −5] with α1 ··· αn = β1 ··· βm; (2) then n = m. In general, an integral domain with this property is known as a half-factorial domain (HFD). Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 5 / 31 Motivation p Most books fail to point out to the readers that while Z[ −5] is not a UFD, it does have a rather nice factorization property. p Specifically, if α1; : : : αn; β1; : : : ; βm are irreducible elements of Z[ −5] with α1 ··· αn = β1 ··· βm; (2) then n = m. In general, an integral domain with this property is known as a half-factorial domain (HFD). Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 5 / 31 Motivation p Most books fail to point out to the readers that while Z[ −5] is not a UFD, it does have a rather nice factorization property. p Specifically, if α1; : : : αn; β1; : : : ; βm are irreducible elements of Z[ −5] with α1 ··· αn = β1 ··· βm; (2) then n = m. In general, an integral domain with this property is known as a half-factorial domain (HFD). Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 5 / 31 Goals Using the ideal class group (and, more generally, thep class number), one can construct a very simple proof of this fact for Z[ −5]. Carlitz first illustrated this argument in PAMS 11(1960), 391-392. His proof (while short) leads to a deeper understanding of how elements factor in an algebraic ring of integers. Chapman (Sam Houston State University) October 19, 2017 6 / 31 Goals Using the ideal class group (and, more generally, thep class number), one can construct a very simple proof of this fact for Z[ −5].

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    93 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us