Name Address Support/Object Comment Response East Ayton PC, S Dawn Naylor It is not proposed to extend boundary in this location. The two fields south-east of Low Hall & Candler House are classified as "Open Countryside" in the SBC Local Plan, within which category policy E1 severely restricts development. As the land does not contain any West Ayton PC, Supports extensions & proposed further standing structures it does not appear to Margaret S extension, supplied annotated map with satisfy the requirement for CA designation of Walker memorial trees and TPOs posessing special architectural and historic interest, therefore its function as part of the setting of the CA is most significant, which is protected under the Local Plan. Proposed to include memorial trees and TPOs on annotated map E Ayton Lodge is evident on the 1854 O/S map and is considered likely to originate from the eighteenth century at its core, with nineteenth and twentieth century extensions. The overall form of the historic parts of the building E Ayton Lodge does not make a remains, and it retains traditional and positive contribution vernacular construction and details in terms of masonry, dressings, chimneys, window openings, roof forms, which reflect the local vernacular character. Therefore it is considered to make a positive contribution to the CA. Modern alterations such as the conservatory and windows detract from the architectural Conservatory & PVC windows lack quality of the building, but are reversible Objects to architectural quality changes and do not nullify the historic East Ayton Kidger, Julian extension to building's architectural form and historic Lodge Hotel include Hotel interest. Currently the conservatory is included in the CA as it was constructed after designation of the boundary. It would not be good practice to delineate a revised boundary that cut through the building, therefoe the issue is exclusion or Would include modern extensions inclusion. The residual quality of the building which lack architectural quality and its historical and physical relationship to the wider site mitigate towards inclusion. Inclusion would not prejudice sympathetic redevelopment of the parts of the site which currently detract from its quality. No objection to retention of garden and walls within CA Boundary should be amended to See above exclude conservatory Traditional architectural details such as window types, barge boards, roofing materials, render and railings are noted in section 6 of the document as contributing to the character of the CA. Section 7 notes the attrition of Recommendation to extend A4 traditional detailing and materials. Section 8 Direction lacks justification or any recommends extension of the A4 to cover the Supports assessment of why PD rights need to whole of the CA. However, the CAAMP in be removed recommendation is not directly linked to the principle, analysis. The text will be adjusted to provide a reservations & Varley, Graham clearer justification. SBC do not intend to concerns re. proceed with serving an A4 Direction at this extension of A4 time therefore any extension is likely to be Direction in SBC within the NYMNP only. area The document details the GPDO development classes of restricted development whereas the Lack of clarity re the Direction, website details the particular forms of confusion between CAAMP & NPA development restricted. This may lead to website confusion and will be rationalised to clarify the forms of permitted development restricted by the Article 4. Inclusion of SBC Policy Update & make Incorporate policy update into Management administrative boundary between SBC Plan. Strengthen administrative boundary on and NYMNP areas clearer. Map 8. Addition of stone boundary walls at Carr Homeowners will be consulted with a view to Lane/Seamer Road junction within the inclusion of the boundary walls in the CA due Scarborough designated area (entrance to village & to their contribution to the streetscene at the Supports subject Borough setting of Church) gateway of the CA. SBC to resolution of Council, Derek particular issues: Recognition of outbuildings at Low Hall Green Annotate Map 8 to mark outbuildings and and platforms at former Station making platforms as positive. a positive contribution to CA (map 8) Disagrees with proposal to extent Extension of A4 within SBC area is a matter for Article 4 Direction to SBC area until SBC to pursue depending on its assessment of additional survey work undertaken to justification and consideration of resource assess effectiveness of ext A4. implications. Future of railway station site and effect Add specific reference to Station site within of designation: specific reference? Management Plan. Inclusion of management policies for See above railway station site specifically? 3.01: include reference to Tabular Hills Include reference Suggested increase in size of maps and Increase size of histric maps and tighten focus tighter area focus? where this would not lead to loss of interest. 5.12: Explication re petrol station/shop Include reference to petrol forecourt in site & reference to future Appraisal and Management Plan. Consv Officer redevelopment aspirations? Green, Derek SBC CAA boundaries encompass historic extent of village, but "core" not applicable because the Define historic core on map, perhaps designation includes two villages, and the also identification of character areas or focus of economic activity has shifted over identity areas? time. Omit reference to "historic core" from text. Add reference to varying character areas within Appraisal. Include schedule of Non-Designated Buildings that made a positive conbtribution to Heritage Assets re positive buildings & the character and history of the CA are features such as trees & plaque on identified on Map 8. Memorial trees will be Garth End Rd identified on Map 11. The Depot site is not wholly included, only the former Station site. The salt store is not proposed to be included. The former Station, with station buildings, platform and engine shed have all previously been identified as Inclusion of Depot site not appropriate having local heritage value by English Heritage because majority contains little of and the NYMNPA, and their retention and North Yorkshire heritage value incorporation in a redevelopment scheme was County Council, Objects to promoted by the Planning Brief prepared by Sean Wilson, inclusion of the NYMNPA in condultation with NYCC in NYCC Property Highways Depot order "to retain the historic railway links of the Transactions in CA site and provide a degree of focus and Manager established character". The retention of the site's heritage assets Remains intention of NYCC to sell the should strengthen any scheme of site for development redevelopment in terms of attractiveness, place-making and local identity. NYCC wishes for entirely of site to be Maintain boundary currently proposed for excluded, but willing to discuss inclusion inclusion. of station building area only The Cottage, Flynn, Abigail Yedmandale No preference Rd, W Ayton Dismayed that Forge Valley Station May Dene, currently not protected, pleased that it Walker, Alan Beech Lane, S Station & path will be included. will be in future along with tree-lined W Ayton path Mill Lane already fully kerbed. There is a danger of excessive highways improvements eroding rural character, particularly around the Derwent Mill Prince, Mr & Would like kerbs/stones to prevent Mill which retains its picturesque setting. Farm, W S Mrs parking on verges on Mill Lane Natural boulder stones may be appropriate but Ayton welcome consultation over details with the NYMNPA if the landowner contemplates such works. 4 Garth End Fletcher, Mrs S Rd Within the NYMNP, land is not designated for development. Development is guided by the Queries re land designated for policies within the North York Moors Core 4 Castle Rise, Ogilvy, Sue S development within village under a local Strategy and Development Policies available at W Ayton development plan www.northyorkmoors.org.uk. Within SBC area, development is guided by SBC's Local Plan available at www.scarborough.gov.uk. Dowkes, Ian & 5 Castle Rise, S Angela W Ayton All proposed changes will enhance character of village 6 Garth End CA designation would grant planning controls Ward, Stella S Rd, W Ayton Old station and yard need protection, of over the demolition of the station buildings and concern & should be preserved help to ensure their heritage value is recognised in any scheme of redevelopment. Welcomes CA extension Forge Valley Station needs protection, 8 Garth End See above iconic building in state of decay Ward, Peter Road, W S Clarify reference to strap/ribbon pointing within Ayton Stop ribbon pointing on all stone the Appraisal (7.01) and refer to use of lime buildings mortar within Management Plan. New building will be guided by the respective Keep new building to a minimum Monymusk, Local Development Plans/Frameworks. Watson, Peter Beech Lane, S Preserve station building See earlier reference. W Ayton The production of the CAAMP should help to Keep character of area intact encourage sympathetic development. Manor Croft has significant architectural quality Manor Croft, Pleased by extension to include Manor and largely retains its original features Baines, MJ Yedmandale S Croft externally. It also has a 'landmark' quality due Rd, W Ayton to its prominent siting. Monymusk, Significant changes would help to retain Watson, Mrs R Beech Lane, S character & help monitor quality of W Ayton changes 28 Hall