House of Commons Defence Committee UK operations in Afghanistan Thirteenth Report of Session 2006–07 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 3 July 2007 HC 408 Published on 18 July 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £20.00 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (Chairman) Mr David S Borrow MP (Labour, South Ribble) Mr David Crausby MP (Labour, Bolton North East) Linda Gilroy MP (Labour, Plymouth Sutton) Mr David Hamilton MP (Labour, Midlothian) Mr Mike Hancock MP (Liberal Democrat, Portsmouth South) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Mr Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, North Essex) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, Durham North) Robert Key MP (Conservative, Salisbury) Willie Rennie MP (Liberal Democrat, Dunfermline and West Fife) John Smith MP (Labour, Vale of Glamorgan) The following Members were also Members of the Committee during the Parliament. Mr Colin Breed MP (Liberal Democrat, South East Cornwall) Derek Conway MP (Conservative, Old Bexley and Sidcup) Mr Mark Lancaster MP (Conservative, North East Milton Keynes) Mr Desmond Swayne MP (Conservative, New Forest West) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at: www.parliament.uk/defcom Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Philippa Helme (Clerk), Eliot Wilson (Second Clerk), Ian Rogers (Audit Adviser), Stephen Jones (Committee Specialist), Adrian Jenner (Inquiry Manager), Richard Dawson (Committee Assistant), Sheryl Dinsdale (Secretary) and Stewart McIlvenna (Senior Office Clerk). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Defence Committee, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA. The telephone number for general enquiries is 020 7219 5745; the Committee’s email address is [email protected]. Media inquiries should be addressed to Alex Paterson on 020 7219 1589. Cover photograph and maps reproduced with the permission of the Ministry of Defence (www.mod.uk); © Crown Copyright Images from www.defenceimages.mod.uk. UK operations in Afghanistan 1 Contents Report Page Maps 3–4 Summary 5 1 Introduction 7 Background 7 The security mission 8 The UK contribution to ISAF 8 Our inquiry 9 Key developments since April 2006 10 2 The ISAF mission 12 The strategic context 12 Purpose 12 ISAF numbers and structure 13 HQ ARRC leadership of ISAF May 2006–February 2007 14 Working in an international context 14 The general security situation 15 Civilian casualties 16 NATO force generation 18 Tour lengths 19 Afghan National Army 20 Justice sector reform 21 The influence of neighbouring countries on Afghanistan 22 3 UK operations in Southern Afghanistan 25 UK force package 25 Regional Command (South) 26 Purpose of the mission 26 The security threat in Helmand 28 Support for the insurgency 29 Forward bases 29 The Musa Qaleh Agreement 30 Current operations 31 Equipment 32 Air-lift and close air support 33 Reconstruction and development in Helmand 35 The UK role in counter-narcotics 37 The scale of the problem 37 The counter-narcotics policy 38 Targeting the trafficker 38 Alternative livelihoods and eradication 39 Arguments for licensed production of opium 40 The information campaign 41 2 UK operations in Afghanistan Conclusions and recommendations 43 Annex: List of Abbreviations 48 Formal minutes 50 Witnesses 51 List of written evidence 52 List of Reports from the Committee during the current Parliament 53 UK operations in Afghanistan 5 Summary In May 2006, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) deployed UK Forces to Helmand Province in Southern Afghanistan as part of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) mission. By the summer of 2007, the number of UK personnel deployed had risen from some 3,300 to approximately 7,700 troops. The vast majority are deployed in Helmand where security is fragile and UK Service personnel have suffered casualties when fighting insurgents. The commitment given by the UK Armed Forces has been outstanding. Afghanistan has experienced thirty years of conflict. ISAF and the international community must focus on establishing security and denying the Taliban and Al Qaeda the environment in which to operate. The ISAF mission was led between May 2006 and February 2007 by the Allied Rapid Reaction Corps (ARRC). During the ARRC’s leadership, ISAF expanded its area of operations first to the South and then to the East of Afghanistan. The challenge of leading a 37–nation coalition is considerable. Ensuring a coordinated comprehensive approach to the reconstruction of Afghanistan requires energetic leadership. We call on the Government to press the UN to appoint a high-profile individual responsible for coordinating the international effort. While the MoD asserts that the Taliban insurgency does not pose a strategic threat to Afghanistan, violence seems to be increasing and spreading to the previously more peaceful provinces in the North and West of Afghanistan and the capital, Kabul. ISAF should continue to minimise civilian casualties on operations and not measure success in terms of the number of insurgents killed. NATO has not provided the required numbers of troops as stated in the Combined Joint Statement Of Requirement (CJSOR). We remain deeply concerned that the reluctance of some NATO members to provide troops for the ISAF mission is undermining NATO’s credibility and ISAF operations. Reforming the Afghan National Army (ANA) is progressing well although ANA units are not yet capable of operating independently of ISAF. Reform of the Afghan National Police (ANP) is not progressing as well as reform of the ANA. Although 62,000 out of a target of 82,000 Police have been trained to date, the standard of the training is reported to be less effective. The international effort should put more emphasis on this training and in addressing corruption in the judicial system. Sufficient air-lift and air support is vital to the UK operation in the South. The MoD has provided additional helicopters since the initial deployment but must make even greater effort to increase the provision of helicopters and crew. UK helicopter operations in Afghanistan are not sustainable at the present intensity. After a slow start, there are signs that the UK effort in delivering reconstruction and development in Helmand has become coordinated better. But there remains much to do. 6 UK operations in Afghanistan The UK is Afghanistan’s G8 partner nation for developing a counter-narcotics policy but this policy is not being communicated sufficiently clearly. We are concerned that uncertainty has arisen among Afghans about ISAF’s role in poppy eradication and that UK Forces, under ISAF command, may consequently have been put at risk. Ending opium production in Helmand will require a long-term commitment by the international community to create a secure environment in which farmers can be encouraged to pursue alternative livelihoods. The Government is not communicating key messages to the British or Afghan public about the purpose of its operations in Afghanistan effectively enough. Afghanistan’s relations with its immediate neighbours, Pakistan and Iran, are vital to its future. We call on the Government to encourage dialogue between Afghanistan and these two countries. UK operations in Afghanistan 7 1 Introduction Background 1. In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre, New York, on 11 September 2001, the Taliban regime in Afghanistan was blamed by the United States (US) Administration (and the United Kingdom Government) for harbouring Al Qaeda terrorists, including its leader Osama Bin Laden, who had claimed responsibility for the attack. In October 2001, the US launched a military campaign—Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)—in conjunction with the Afghan Northern Alliance to remove the Taliban from power. The military campaign, for which the US provided air power and the Northern Alliance provided ground forces, ended with the fall of the Taliban in December 2001. 2. Following the end of the military campaign, prominent Afghans met in December 2001 in Bonn, Germany, under the auspices of the United Nations to determine the post- Taliban future for Afghanistan. The resulting Bonn Agreement set out a twin-track political and stabilisation process for Afghanistan. Nationwide presidential and parliamentary elections followed in 2004 and 2005; and a 5,000 strong International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) was deployed under United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1386, to ensure stability in Kabul.1 The US-led OEF counter- terrorism mission continued to operate separately from ISAF, primarily in the Eastern provinces of Afghanistan. 3. Since March 2002, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) has coordinated the international political and diplomatic effort in Afghanistan. The UNAMA’s stated mission in Afghanistan is to provide assistance to the Afghanistan Government in developing its institutions, protecting human rights and promoting development. The UNAMA is headed by Tom Koenigs, Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Afghanistan (SRSG), who has overall responsibility for all UN activities in the country.2 4. In addition to the UNAMA mission, many other international institutions have a presence in Afghanistan. In January 2006, 53 countries negotiated the Afghanistan Compact which committed the Afghanistan Government and the international community to achieving three overarching goals by 2011: security; governance; and economic development.